Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald J. Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein’s victims.

And yet Trump is hiding the PedoFiles. And Mikey Johnson is aiding and abetting Trump.

An innocent person doesn't hide. They want everything out in the open.

Trump is hiding something. Clearly.

And you cannot dance around that no matter how hard you try.

America wants to know what he is hiding, and the longer he hides the PedoFiles the worse it will be for him and the Republicans in the mid-terms.

.


I don't see anyone hiding anything? Maybe an extra X-president is being protected by President Trump? Maybe looking to not get sued? Maybe saving for an OCT surprise.

Sebaceous gossip typed up, edited by Stain over a decade is not reliable evidence anyways.

The girls named names in Court under oath perhaps. Even then they could be lying?

But you don't care if it ruins Big DEM political hacks or Hollywood.

Be careful. You might get your wish very soon.//
 
No wonder............

Democrats reveal whistleblower details of Ghislaine Maxwell prison ‘luxuries’

Ghislaine Maxwell, the Jeffrey Epstein confidante and convicted child sex trafficker, is being waited on “hand and foot” by the staff at her minimum security prison camp while she prepares a request that President Donald Trump commute her sentence, according to whistleblower revelations made public on Monday by House Democrats.

“The deference and servility to Ms. Maxwell have reached such preposterous levels that one of the top officials at the facility has complained that he is ‘sick of having to be Maxwell’s *****,’” according to a letter to Trump from Rep. Jamie Raskin of Maryland, the ranking Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee.

Raskin’s letter said Maxwell has received customized meals personally delivered to her cell, after-hours time in a private exercise area and access to a service puppy.

Raskin said Maxwell was also afforded private meetings with visitors arranged by the warden, complete with snacks. The guests were allowed to bring computers, which Raskin described as “an unprecedented action” that risked Maxwell having “unmonitored communications with the outside world.”

When the phone lines went down for other inmates at the camp, Raskin said, Maxwell had friends and relatives call prison employees, who then could help her speak to them.

“These luxuries and amenities … mark Ms. Maxwell more as a guest at a Trump hotel than a federal prisoner and child sex offender,” Raskin wrote.

https://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/news/de...-ghislaine-maxwell-prison-luxuries-rcna242928

AI Overview

In the U.S. federal prison system, the claim is generally correct: Bureau of Prisons (BOP) policy requires that inmates with a
sex offender status be housed in at least a low-security prison, which precludes them from being in a minimum-security facility, unless a specific waiver is granted.

Gee, I wonder who would have been motivated to sign a waiver and why???????
All of these morons quoting a BS, paywalled NYT article but not one of them will post the actual email. I read the first one--before the paywall block and that nonsense will never fly. More nothing burger.
 
You aren't even making sense.

Do rational women believe that rape is "sexy"?
Oops, looks like you meant to post to your assistant again. I wonder where he went?

Good luck.

When the urge to make your own point in your own words grabs you, head on back.
 
And most never made it to a courtroom.

Slap yourself for not knowing that.


They just recently made it to a press conference, did you not hear?

Am I to believe those girls outright? Maybe they want more money like the blue-haired lying hag? I don't know.

Was Kobe Brtants COL HOE Lying?

You can't have here-say or Stain documents as proof. Case closed//
 
They just recently made it to a press conference, did you not hear?
Actually, I saw it, because it was a press conference.

Apparently you didn't, because then you would know only 10 victims were there.

And would thus know your point is embarrassingly dumb and that you are wasting everyone's time with your uninformed posts.
 
Actually, I saw it, because it was a press conference.

Apparently you didn't, because then you would know only 10 victims were there.

And would thus know your point is embarrassingly dumb and that you are wasting everyone's time with your uninformed posts.

Only 10! Lol! How many do you need?

I don't watch or read news Stain media since 04NOV2020.

I read here or GP, some CNBC finance. I have common sense.

I'm out, watching Mr. KIM on Nutflix. Need to read captions//
 
Well ... I believe in giving credit where credit is due. Yes ... he's a conman and a liar but a broken clock is right twice a day. A few things he does to benefit himself or his establishment cronies can actually benefit the American people as a side consequence. When those things occur, I'll give him credit.
I do to.

His tariffs are lowering the deficit (if they past muster).

He nominated 3 great SCOTUS judges.

I voted for him 3 times....for one reason....protecting a conservative majority on the SCOTUS.

But he exagerates, hyperbolicates, and out-and-out lies a lot. I knew that from the start. The other side does too. The only difference being that Trump has no dissonance...he knows. The left....they think they walk on water so God somehow makes their lies O.K. And they lie as much as he does.
 
More evidence is needed if anyone truly wants to put Trump in jail. :)

👉👉 How investigators and courts treat this kind of material

  • A suspect’s written allegation about another person is evidence that must be corroborated. Prosecutors look for independent corroboration (witnesses, records, testimony from victims, etc.) before charging.
  • News outlets and officials have noted the emails raise questions and warrant further review, but several outlets explicitly say the emails alone are not proof of criminal conduct.

Bottom line
  • True: The emails were released and contain the quoted lines attributed to Epstein.
  • Likely that Trump "had something to do with the victim"?
Not established. The emails are allegations by Epstein, not independent proof; public reporting and existing sworn statements from the named victim have not accused Trump of sexual misconduct. Determining "likely" requires corroborating evidence beyond Epstein’s claims.

sources:

1. Newly Released Epstein Email Says Donald Trump ‘Knew About the Girls’
2. Read Jeffrey Epstein’s newly released emails about Trump
But then we are not in court are we?

Yet…
 
Oops, looks like you meant to post to your assistant again. I wonder where he went?

Good luck.

When the urge to make your own point in your own words grabs you, head on back.

You can run away from the question, if you like. It's just funny that everyone can see you run.
 
Only 10! Lol! How many do you need?
The indictment of Epstein listen dozens. And those are only the ones that the LEOs managed both to interview AND to get chargeable material from.

Are you so goddamn stupid that you need someone to explain to you that 10 people not claiming Trump raped them doesn't mean he raped none of the other victims?

Stop playing stupid and wasting my time.
 
All of these morons quoting a BS, paywalled NYT article but not one of them will post the actual email. I read the first one--before the paywall block and that nonsense will never fly. More nothing burger.
I posted them several times
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom