Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald J. Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein’s victims.

[Delldude]

And if he hadn't slept with Virginia, what was going on those hours he spent with her? Again, could it be, that Virginia told trump what was going on there with Epstein and minors? Trump held it close for a blackmail or leverage opportunity? I DON'T KNOW!?

Michael Wolff put it all into perspective:

Finally, one problem with reading the Epstein emails today is that Epstein was, in adviser Wolff’s words, a “notorious liar.

MAGA Mike Johnson even said Trump was an informant for the FBI, then he came out and retracted his statement....?

Informant is a stretch. Trump was on the list to provide a deposition to investigators in Epsteins first investigation. Trump called Brad Edwards, the attorney representing the victims and asked him what did he want to know, they spoke at length.

 

[Mac1958]

Are Epstein and Maxwell concerned with Trump ratting them out to the Police chief in West Palm beach?

Or concerned he was the person who ratted him out before his first arrest, because they were in a fight with one another over a real estate back stabbing?

Was Epstein 75% there with the police chief....75% there that Trump was the rat?

What if, it was Trump that ratted Epstein out on his minor girl abuses? You'd think he'd be bragging about it and want that exposed with the file release?

Or is that what Trump is Trying to hide, from all of the billionaires associated with Epstein? He doesn't want to be known as A RAT?

Here it comes. They're telegraphing how they're going to handle the Epstein files if anything is bad in there:

Proof of fraud in the "Epstein files"

 

[AntonToo]

Dude, move on, we actually have more important things going on in the world.... You people are easily distracted with stupidity

Dude take your advice on what I do with my time and shove it you know where.

 

[AntonToo]

Meh.....

yea “meh” as in…I’ll just believe whatever I want to

 

[Delldude]

Here it comes. They're telegraphing how they're going to handle the Epstein files if anything is bad in there:

Proof of fraud in the "Epstein files"

Run with it..... This is the guy who Epstein was feeling information for a book:

Finally, one problem with reading the Epstein emails today is that Epstein was, in adviser Wolff’s words, a “notorious liar"

 

[Delldude]

yea “meh” as in…I’ll just believe whatever I want to

You have trouble accepting her own words........"meh".....

You know she's mentioned being molested by a family member don't you?

 

[AntonToo]

You have trouble accepting her own words........"meh".....

Dummy, again, in her own words she never said her dad was behaving sexually towards her.

Thats in her own words, the rest is in YOUR baseless words.

 

[Delldude]

Dummy, again, in her own words she never said her dad was behaving sexually towards her.

Thats in her own words, the rest is in YOUR baseless words.

I said 'a family member '....

 

[buckeye]

How does that change what Epstein and Maxwell said in the emails about Trump and Virginia? Were Epstein and Maxwell lying to each other?

What did Maxwell say about Virginia and Trump? All I read is that democrats redacted Virginia's name in an email by Epstein wondering why Trump never got in any trouble over all of this. Nobody understands the exact context of that email, either. There are numerous interpretations that can be true.

Why do you think democrats redacted Virginia's name?

 

[Care4all]

You do have a link, correct?

You can Google it!

 

[Care4all]

What did Maxwell say about Virginia and Trump? All I read is that democrats redacted Virginia's name in an email by Epstein wondering why Trump never got in any trouble over all of this. Nobody understands the exact context of that email, either. There are numerous interpretations that can be true.

Why do you think democrats redacted Virginia's name?

Because of protocol of not publicly identifying victims in the releases, redacting all of their names....

 

[postman]

Michael Wolff put it all into perspective:

Finally, one problem with reading the Epstein emails today is that Epstein was, in adviser Wolff’s words, a “notorious liar.

Even notorious liars tell the truth when what they say is a "statement against interest".
The reason they lie, is to gain an advantage or profit.

Meaning if a tax cheat emails how he cheated on his taxes, it's probably the truth.
But If a tax cheat emails that he paid his taxes in full, then it could easily be a lie.

 

[postman]

You have trouble accepting her own words........"meh".....

You know she's mentioned being molested by a family member don't you?

Except that family member was a cousin

You left out that part.

 

[Delldude]

You can Google it!

You're admitting you can't prove it then.................

 

[postman]

Dummy, again, in her own words she never said her dad was behaving sexually towards her.

Thats in her own words, the rest is in YOUR baseless words.

They're basing it on the private thoughts a child wrote down that were explained oppositely as an adult.

 

[postman]

Because of protocol of not publicly identifying victims in the releases, redacting all of their names....

Republicans think following the law is a conspiracy.

 

[Delldude]

Even notorious liars tell the truth when what they say is a "statement against interest".
The reason they lie, is to gain an advantage or profit.

So the emails are full of lies then, thank you.

Except that family member was a cousin

You left out that part.

She admitted something to that effect with a cousin. The instance I mentioned was with a 'close' family member.

They're basing it on the private thoughts a child wrote down that were explained oppositely as an adult.

That child wrote it when she was a wee tyke of 38 or 39 years old.

Republicans think following the law is a conspiracy

Democrats view themselves breaking the law as a standard practice.

 

[postman]

You're admitting you can't prove it then.................

She's saying what we should always tell your side.
Look it up for yourself, because whenever we post a citation, you attack the messenger and dismiss it.
You can easily Google a suitable citation from whatever source you deem credible.

 

[postman]

So the emails are full of lies then, thank you.

It depends. If they're statements against interest, they are legally considered to be TRUE.

 

[Delldude]

She's saying what we should always tell your side.
Look it up for yourself, because whenever we post a citation, you attack the messenger and dismiss it.
You can easily Google a suitable citation from whatever source you deem credible.

It's not publicly available information..............

It depends. If they're statements against interest, they are legally considered to be TRUE.

Bullshit......