JD Vance says the letter in WSJ does not sound like Trump

ElmerMudd said:
good point. You can pay them for sex but not to keep their mouth shut about an affair and calling it a business expense while you are running for president
Click to expand...

NDAs are a deductible business expense. They aren't a campaign contribution.
 
Toddsterpatriot said:
It's deductible. You may have noticed, none of the fake charges mentioned taxes.
Click to expand...
Why else would you falsify business records?

What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts ...​

1752843938245.webp
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Jun 3, 2024 — Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York.

Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. He pleaded not guilty when he was arraigned last year.

In 2017, Cohen and Allen Weisselberg, an executive at the Trump Organization, reached an agreement about how Cohen would be repaid for the $130,000 that he sent to Daniels in exchange for her silence. Weisselberg detailed the calculations in handwritten notes that were shown to the jury at trial.

Cohen would receive $130,000 for the Daniels payment, plus $50,000 intended for a technology company that did unrelated work for Trump. That amount was doubled to account for taxes that Cohen would have to pay on the income. Weisselberg then tacked on an extra $60,000 as a bonus for Cohen, who was upset that his regular year-end award had been cut. The total worked out to $420,000.
 
JoeB131 said:
We know nothing of the sort.

We know someone produced a diary claiming to belong to his daughter that has a cryptic passage in it.

We don't know Ashley wrote it
We don't know if the incident happened
Click to expand...
Two people went to jail for it, so yes it's real.
 
Nuthin' Fancy said:
Why else would you falsify business records?

What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts ...​

View attachment 1137961
CBS News
https://www.cbsnews.com › Politics
Jun 3, 2024 — Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York.

Trump was charged with 34 counts of falsification of business records in the first degree, which is a felony in New York. He pleaded not guilty when he was arraigned last year.

In 2017, Cohen and Allen Weisselberg, an executive at the Trump Organization, reached an agreement about how Cohen would be repaid for the $130,000 that he sent to Daniels in exchange for her silence. Weisselberg detailed the calculations in handwritten notes that were shown to the jury at trial.

Cohen would receive $130,000 for the Daniels payment, plus $50,000 intended for a technology company that did unrelated work for Trump. That amount was doubled to account for taxes that Cohen would have to pay on the income. Weisselberg then tacked on an extra $60,000 as a bonus for Cohen, who was upset that his regular year-end award had been cut. The total worked out to $420,000.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info that didn't mention any tax violations.
 
Missouri_Mike said:
Since you can’t disprove something that doesn’t exist I’m pretty sure the paper will have to show they have this card.
Click to expand...
And I am sure it will. The WSJ has been in circulation for 136 years. You don't last that long in the news business by printing fake news.
 
Kilroy2 said:
So your saying that it is alright for Trump

So is that your excuse for Trump because Clinton did it. So that makes it alright for Trump.

Everyone knows what Clinton did and guess what he is no longer president

Lame effort to change the topic by saying , if Clinton did it then it makes it alright for Trump to do it.

What makes it relevant is who is the current president now.

And just because Clinton did it , does not justify Trump doing it as you suggest.

Clinton is no longer president so what are you going to do. What he did is known, He is an example only at this point of the game.

So are you saying what Clinton did is alright and that makes what Trump is doing alright.

So your just trying to change the subject to a person who is no longer President

Trump is president and what he does is the topic and relevant as he is the president.

It is still wrong. What Clinton did is wrong and people are aware of what happen . So stop trying to change the subject and sugguest become Clinton did it, then it is alright for trump to do it.

If you believe that what clinton did is wrong then it is wrong for Trump

Some lame idea that because Clinton did it then it is alright for Trump to do it.

Well guess what, Clinton was impeached.

So using your logic Trump should be impeached.

Good idea, glad you though of it.
Click to expand...

BluesLegend said:
Are you shitting me, CLINTON in the oval office making us a laughing stock before the entire world. Then LIED through his slimy Dem lying pie hole while looking America in the eye, throwing the intern he abused under the bus. Then there's enabler Hillary. It's not even in the same zip code as Trump.
Click to expand...
Clinton was president over 25 years ago. We know what he did.

Trump is the topic as he is running for president currently. So if you despise Clinton for his misconduct then why do you support Trump with his misconduct?
 
Last edited:
ElmerMudd said:
JD Vance says the letter in WSJ does not sound like Trump.
The letter featured lines of typewritten text framed by a drawing of a naked woman, with Trump’s name signed below the woman’s waist. (pubic hair)
Does not sound like Trump, you have to be kidding. The man, as a 60 year old, who bragged to a 20 something tv host that he can grab women by the ***** because he is famous. The man convicted of paying a porn star to be quiet about the affair they had soon after his wife gave birth to his son. The guy who has 5 kids by 3 wives and multiple documented affairs while married.

It definitely sounds like him but do his supporters care? They didn't care about any of his previous dalliances.

Click to expand...
And JD Vance the Trump asslicker doesnt sound like the JD Vance that got rich writing a book about what a piece of shit Trump is.

So it goes...
 
Kilroy2 said:
Clinton was president over 25 years ago. We know what he did.

Trump is the topic as he is running for president currently. So if you despise Clinton for his misconduct then why do you support Trump with his misconduct?
Click to expand...
MAGAts don't understand that their lame tu quoque points cut both ways.
 
jknowgood said:
Lol, if she wasn't my daughter. I'd DATE her.
Click to expand...
You would say THAT to your daughter and on TV?

Know wonder why Trump loves his cult, your'e just as sick as his he is.
jknowgood said:
Ashley Biden, my dad took inappropriate showers with me. You really want to go there?
Click to expand...
LOL.

Sure you must think that's worse?
 
Seeing as Trump has reacted vociferously to such press allegations in the past and seeing as the WSJ has mostly been favorable to him, it seems unthinkable that this article were not thoroughly vetted and, thus, totally verifiable.
 
ElmerMudd said:
JD Vance says the letter in WSJ does not sound like Trump.
The letter featured lines of typewritten text framed by a drawing of a naked woman, with Trump’s name signed below the woman’s waist. (pubic hair)
Does not sound like Trump, you have to be kidding. The man, as a 60 year old, who bragged to a 20 something tv host that he can grab women by the ***** because he is famous. The man convicted of paying a porn star to be quiet about the affair they had soon after his wife gave birth to his son. The guy who has 5 kids by 3 wives and multiple documented affairs while married.

It definitely sounds like him but do his supporters care? They didn't care about any of his previous dalliances.

Click to expand...


A couple of years ago, J.V. Dunce would have said it sounds exactly like Trump, so his "opinion" doesn't count...

The man sold his soul for a job, for a step up. He's lost any credibility, he's an empty suit, spineless.

 
15th post
President Trump on Friday accused Rupert Murdoch and The Wall Street Journal of defaming him in an article about a lewd birthday greeting that the publication said Mr. Trump had sent to the disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein decades ago.

In a suit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Mr. Trump said the article “falsely claimed that he authored, drew and signed” the note to Mr. Epstein.

The complaint claimed that “given the timing” of the article, “the overwhelming financial and reputational harm suffered by President Trump will continue to multiply.” It asked for awarded damages “not to be less than $10 billion.”

Can a rapist and convicted criminal who tried to subvert the will of the voters by plotting to steal an election have his reputation damaged any more than it already is?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

a “mega arms deal,” Washington purchasing Ukrainian combat drones tested in war, in exchange for...

< Previous Thread

Trump’s Health Problems Getting Worse

Next Thread >

Similar threads

trumptman
Politico, You Don't Have to Sell Me More on JD Vance!
2
Replies
28
Views
434
Stann
S
CrusaderFrank
JD Vance, the Republican Obama
Replies
13
Views
159
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Admiral Rockwell Tory
berg80
How trump has lowered the bar for personal conduct.
12 13 14
Replies
276
Views
3K
Correll
C
M
Why do so many women love Trump?
7 8 9
Replies
169
Views
2K
struth
S
Nostra
Looks like Trump has another libel suit to win. This time the WSJ.
Replies
3
Views
179
Nostra
Nostra

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom