JD Vance says the letter in WSJ does not sound like Trump

[Missouri_Mike]

The standard of proof for libel hinges on the printed statement being false.
First Trump would have to prove that what The WSJ printed is false.

Since you can’t disprove something that doesn’t exist I’m pretty sure the paper will have to show they have this card.

 

[struth]

Is it about the law? Is religious people deciding to vote for such a man about the law?

Nope, it's not about the law, it's about ethics and morality.

The alternative was harris, so yes it was about ethics and morality

 

[Kilroy2]

Are you shitting me, CLINTON in the oval office making us a laughing stock before the entire world. Then LIED through his slimy Dem lying pie hole while looking America in the eye, throwing the intern he abused under the bus. Then there's enabler Hillary. It's not even in the same zip code as Trump.

So your saying that it is alright for

Are you shitting me, CLINTON in the oval office making us a laughing stock before the entire world. Then LIED through his slimy Dem lying pie hole while looking America in the eye, throwing the intern he abused under the bus. Then there's enabler Hillary. It's not even in the same zip code as Trump.

So is that your excuse for Trump because Clinton did it. So that makes it alright for Trump.

Everyone knows what Clinton did and guess what he is no longer president

Lame effort to change the topic by saying , if Clinton did it then it makes it alright for Trump to do it.

What makes it relevant is who is the current president now.

And just because Clinton did it , does not justify Trump doing it as you suggest.

Clinton is no longer president so what are you going to do. What he did is known, He is an example only at this point of the game.

So are you saying what Clinton did is alright and that makes what Trump is doing alright.

So your just trying to change the subject to a person who is no longer President

Trump is president and what he does is the topic and relevant as he is the president.

It is still wrong. What Clinton did is wrong and people are aware of what happen . So stop trying to change the subject and sugguest become Clinton did it, then it is alright for trump to do it.

If you believe that what clinton did is wrong then it is wrong for Trump

Some lame idea that because Clinton did it then it is alright for Trump to do it.

Well guess what, Clinton was impeached.

So using your logic Trump should be impeached.

Good idea, glad you though of it.

 

[ElmerMudd]

I didn't know that was against the law.

good point. You can pay them for sex but not to keep their mouth shut about an affair and calling it a business expense while you are running for president

 

[ElmerMudd]

You’re the last ******* people we need to look to for morals. **** off.

Missouri Mike sounds like quite a moral person

 

[struth]

So your saying that it is alright for

So is that your excuse for Trump because Clinton did it. So that makes it alright for Trump.

Everyone knows what Clinton did and guess what he is no longer president

Lame effort to change the topic by saying , if Clinton did it then it makes it alright for Trump to do it.

What makes it relevant is who is the current president now.

And just because Clinton did it , does not justify Trump doing it as you suggest.

Clinton is no longer president so what are you going to do. What he did is known, He is an example only at this point of the game.

So are you saying what Clinton did is alright and that makes what Trump is doing alright.

So your just trying to change the subject to a person who is no longer President

Trump is president and what he does is the topic and relevant as he is the president.

It is still wrong. What Clinton did is wrong and people are aware of what happen . So stop trying to change the subject and sugguest become Clinton did it, then it is alright for trump to do it.

If you believe that what clinton did is wrong then it is wrong for Trump

Some lame idea that because Clinton did it then it is alright for Trump to do it.

Well guess what, Clinton was impeached.

So using your logic Trump should be impeached.

Good idea, glad you though of it.

Trump didn’t do what Clinton did, was never accused of any thing like that

 

[konradv]

JD Vance says the letter in WSJ does not sound like Trump.
The letter featured lines of typewritten text framed by a drawing of a naked woman, with Trump’s name signed below the woman’s waist. (pubic hair)
Does not sound like Trump, you have to be kidding. The man, as a 60 year old, who bragged to a 20 something tv host that he can grab women by the ***** because he is famous. The man convicted of paying a porn star to be quiet about the affair they had soon after his wife gave birth to his son. The guy who has 5 kids by 3 wives and multiple documented affairs while married.

It definitely sounds like him but do his supporters care? They didn't care about any of his previous dalliances.

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/07/17/maga-trump-epstein-00461944

JD is covering for the boss.

 

[konradv]

Trump didn’t do what Clinton did, was never accused of any thing like that

Trump did much worse.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

I didn't know that was against the law.

It is when you try to write it off on your taxes, like the corrupt, orange shit bird did.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

A 19 year old giving a blow job in the oval office?

Once again, you lose track of your lies.

Lewinsky was 22 years old, old enough to know better.

Your dear leader was ******* 14 year old girls.

 

[luiza]

JD Vance says the letter in WSJ does not sound like Trump.

I have several times very quietly posted that there is a Trumpfy double --- who is much shorter .
Naturally Normies will find this observation impossible to swallow but that is why they are termed Normies .

The real Trumpfy is "otherwise engaged" for awhile perhaps esconced with Nathaniel Rothschild the leader of the much more moderate Deep State faction .

Those with Eyes to See will realise that this is all distinctly possible , and likely , given the two different message streams we have had.
Others will resort to my presumed unusual uses of tin foil and medication as explanations of this post .
So be it .

 

[Mac1958]

It definitely sounds like him but do his supporters care?

Nah. At this point, out of all the things he has said and posted and done over these last ten years, I think we now see the only two things that could potentially knock him off the cult throne: Hard evidence (photos, video) of him and an underage girl in extremis, or hard evidence that he has lied about the Epstein thing on a large scale.

Especially the people on this board. They're the True Believers of the True Believers.

 

[Mac1958]

Whoa, WSJ.

Looks like the Epstein/Trump operation was even uglier than we thought.

 

[struth]

Trump did much worse.

You really have no shame…what intern did he stick cigar in at the White House?

 

[jknowgood]

And he didn't deserve to stay POTUS, did he?

Well he did lower presidents expectations.

 

[JoeB131]

You really have no shame…what intern did he stick cigar in at the White House?

The intern was a consenting adult.

We're not so sure about the girls on Lolita Island.

 

[jknowgood]

Once again, you lose track of your lies.

Lewinsky was 22 years old, old enough to know better.

Your dear leader was ******* 14 year old girls.

Prove it, but we do know Biden sexually assaulted his own daughter, and you was fine with that.

 

[JoeB131]

Prove it, but we do know Biden sexually assaulted his own daughter, and you was fine with that.

We know nothing of the sort.

We know someone produced a diary claiming to belong to his daughter that has a cryptic passage in it.

We don't know Ashley wrote it
We don't know if the incident happened

 

[SeaMajor7]

Once again, you lose track of your lies.

Lewinsky was 22 years old, old enough to know better.

Your dear leader was ******* 14 year old girls.

Cool story, PSYCHOPATH.
Get a ******* LIFE.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

Prove it, but we do know Biden sexually assaulted his own daughter, and you was fine with that.