emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
- Jan 21, 2010
- 23,669
- 4,181
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/20/world/asia/japan-okinawa-protest-united-states-military.html
Because of repeated cases of rape or rape charges against US military personnel,
Japanese are protesting and demanding removal.
Should the Japanese have a say in screening and approving US troops through their own military
to make sure these troops are safe and not criminal?
The Third Amendment against quartering of troops only applies to US citizens,
but what about the concept. What if the Japanese had representation through
its own military and could agree on a policy for screening and staging US troops if this is affecting their population. Wouldn't the US want screening of foreign people serving as part of our national security?
Would that solve the problem? If both countries did the screening to weed out criminally unsafe people?
Because of repeated cases of rape or rape charges against US military personnel,
Japanese are protesting and demanding removal.
Should the Japanese have a say in screening and approving US troops through their own military
to make sure these troops are safe and not criminal?
The Third Amendment against quartering of troops only applies to US citizens,
but what about the concept. What if the Japanese had representation through
its own military and could agree on a policy for screening and staging US troops if this is affecting their population. Wouldn't the US want screening of foreign people serving as part of our national security?
Would that solve the problem? If both countries did the screening to weed out criminally unsafe people?