Japan Suggests Israel Could be Behind Tanker Attack, as President of Company Calls US Claims Fake

[flacaltenn]

Also the captain of the tanker might be right about "being fired upon".. Because if someone hung mines on the hull above the water level, they COULD be set off with small arms fire or patrol boat guns..

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The same paranoid schi

Is it any wonder why Israel sees American liberal Jews, in the same way they label the Jews that worked for the NAZIS?

They called them KAPOS.

Kapos – The Holocaust Explained: Designed for schools

Something else ignored by our beloved educators who rewrite history in order to enslave the minds of the young.

The same they ignore the black slave owners in this country, the blacks that fought voluntarily for the confederates, the vast number of Native American tribes that owned slaves and fought for the confederacy along with the Trans Sahara slave trade and the Barbary Coast slave trade.

We have nothing mind warped fucking dupes parroting their simplistic bullshit.

If you say so Adolph

YOU ARE A FUCKING IGNORANT LOSER. YOU OBVIOUSLY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT HISTORY YOU FUCKING LOSER.

HERE IS A QUESTION YOU FUCKING LOSER. WHY HAS ISRAEL NAMED A TRAIN STATION AFTER TRUMP IS HE IS A NAZI?

WANT TO TRY TO CHALLENGE ME ON WHAT KAPOS WERE YOU FUCKING LOSER? THAT IS WHAT I THOUGHT YOU FUCKING LOSER.

YOU DUMB FUCKING LOSER. YOU DUMB FUCKING IGNORANT LOSER.

I love it when I trigger Adolphs kid

Bye the Netenyahoo just named a new golan heights settlement after Trump. Biden is funneling cruse missiles to the palistinians to nuke it

On his last day in office, Obama tried to send millions of dollars to the terrorist entity to help them destroy Istral.

On his first day in office, Trump cancelled iy . I wouldn't say I necessarily became a fan of Trump that day, but I sure respected what he did .

Wrong Obama did send 4 billion to iran, because he is a crazy kenyan muslim

I am not wrong at all.

Obama attempted to send millions to the Palestinians on his last day in office and Trump cancelled it on his first.

Look it up.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Japan Suggests Even Israel Could be Behind Tanker Attack, as President of Company Calls Pentagon Report Fake — Steemit

A source within the government of Japan has suggested that Israel, as well as the US itself, could be behind an attack on a Japanese tanker, according to the Japanese daily Japan Today.

In an article "Japan demands more proof from U.S. that Iran attacked tankers," the newspaper's online version reports:

If having expertise sophisticated enough to conduct the attack could be a reason to conclude that the attacker was Iran, "That would apply to the United States and Israel as well," said a source at the Foreign Ministry.

Liberal/progressive commentator Cenk Uygur of the popular program The Young Turks said on a show recently that only Israel or Saudi Arabia had motive to attack a Japanese tanker, in order to blame it on Iran, after the president of the tanker company called US claims that Iran was responsible "false." Iran has categorically denied any involvement.

Israeli hardliners have long advocated for US military action against Iran.

President Trump recently cited a video released by the Pentagon as showing what the Pentagon says is a limpit underwater mine being removed by a purported Iranian special forces crew. But observers with military backgrounds say that the video does not show a limpit mine, which is large, heavy, and conical, but magnetic ladder rungs used for climbing the sides of ships.

The president of the tanker company insists unequivocally that the ship was fired upon by "flying objects," not mines.

CBS News said:

"Company president Yutaka Katada said Friday he believes the flying objects seen by the sailors could have been bullets. He denied any possibility of mines or torpedoes because the damage was above the ship's waterline. He called reports of a mine attack "false.""

The Washington Post in an article entitled "Trump rejects Iran’s denials that it attacked tankers, citing video released by Central Command" wrote:

"the head of the Japanese shipping company that owns one of the targeted tankers challenged the U.S. assertion that the vessel was attacked with limpet mines. He said Friday that the crew reported it was hit by “a flying object.”"

The New York Times reported:

"One of the tankers that were attacked in the Gulf of Oman was struck by a flying object, the ship’s Japanese operator said on Friday, expressing doubt that a mine had been attached to its hull."

In 2005 Israel publicly acknowledged carrying out a 1954 attack on American targets in the Middle East, known as the Lavon Affair, in which Israeli operatives planted bombs which were then falsely blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood.

And in 1967, in a still highly disputed incident, the crew of a US surveillance ship, the USS Liberty, say a 75 minute attack by Israeli warplanes was deliberate. The attack expended hundreds of rounds of cannon fire, rockets, napalm, machine-gun fire at lifeboats, and a torpedo from an Israeli patrol boat. It has been opined by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Navy Admiral Thomas Moorer, that the attack may have been intended to draw the US into war with Egypt.

The attack killed 34 US sailors and wounded hundreds of others.

The Israeli newspaper Haraatz on last May 20th ran an article entitled "Netanyahu's Iran Dilemma: Getting Trump to Act Without Putting Israel on the Front Line" states:

"Even if Trump's instinct tells him it's best to avoid war with Iran, no one can be certain of his intentions - not even Netanyahu."

The Israeli secret service, the Mossad, previously proclaimed the slogan "by way of deception thou shalt make war." It has been changed to “without deception, a nation falls.”

In 2007, former commander of NATO and former presidential candidate General Wes Clark made waves when he told an audience that a series of regime changes had been planned by the Pentagon since even before the invasion of Iraq. Clark said a general within the Bush Administration told him before the invasion.

And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."

The video of so called proof that it was the Iranians is a joke.

That video is so blurry and grainy that no one can really see what is happening or who is in the shot. The claim that it's video of Iranians removing mines from the ship is beyond insulting to anyone who has a working brain. No one goes back to the scene of the crime immediately to retrieve a mine. They come up with video yet they don't have security in place after the attack? That is so ridiculous it's insulting to intelligent people.

I agree with the article, Saudi Arabia or Israel are responsible for this. I saw this coming last month.

I made the mistake in 2003 to believe the bush boy and Colin Powell. Mostly because we had the canceled receipts from reagan and bush the first selling chemical weapons to Iraq.

We've been through this before and it wasn't that long ago.

Add to the fact that trump lies through his teeth just about every time he speaks.

I won't fall for the lies again.

I have no reason to believe that Japanese businessman is lying. I believe him.

You just had to prove you are a world-class moron, didn't you?

The boat was clearly Iranian. Don't you think they tracked where it returned to shore?

The mine was clearly removed by the crew of the boat.

The video was taken at long range by an aircraft. Didn't see that did you?

The Iranians knew that if the failed limpet mine was discovered, it would be a huge billboard pointing at who was responsible. They had to take a chance to recover it when it did not blow! As a result, the Iranian boat became the billboard!

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Israel has the most to gain from war with Iran.....

Or Saudi Arabia or Kuwait or Russia...

That was NOT a mine.. It was 6 to 10 feet ABOVE the water line... That's all I know about the deceptions going on here...

You don't know shit about mines do you?

 

[skye]

I could say so many things about this False Flag... but I will keep my mouth firmly shut.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I could say so many things about this False Flag... but I will keep my mouth firmly shut.

If you think this is a false flag, that would be extremely advisable.

 

[Rigby5]

Also the captain of the tanker might be right about "being fired upon".. Because if someone hung mines on the hull above the water level, they COULD be set off with small arms fire or patrol boat guns..

No, look at the images.
You can see dents in the hull where it had been hit by projectiles.
And hanging mines above the water line makes no sense.
What would hold them on, and how could you place them there?
Mines underwater make more sense because then the ship sinks.
The explosive force is greater because it has water pressure added to it.

 

[Rigby5]

Japan Suggests Even Israel Could be Behind Tanker Attack, as President of Company Calls Pentagon Report Fake — Steemit

A source within the government of Japan has suggested that Israel, as well as the US itself, could be behind an attack on a Japanese tanker, according to the Japanese daily Japan Today.

In an article "Japan demands more proof from U.S. that Iran attacked tankers," the newspaper's online version reports:

If having expertise sophisticated enough to conduct the attack could be a reason to conclude that the attacker was Iran, "That would apply to the United States and Israel as well," said a source at the Foreign Ministry.

Liberal/progressive commentator Cenk Uygur of the popular program The Young Turks said on a show recently that only Israel or Saudi Arabia had motive to attack a Japanese tanker, in order to blame it on Iran, after the president of the tanker company called US claims that Iran was responsible "false." Iran has categorically denied any involvement.

Israeli hardliners have long advocated for US military action against Iran.

President Trump recently cited a video released by the Pentagon as showing what the Pentagon says is a limpit underwater mine being removed by a purported Iranian special forces crew. But observers with military backgrounds say that the video does not show a limpit mine, which is large, heavy, and conical, but magnetic ladder rungs used for climbing the sides of ships.

The president of the tanker company insists unequivocally that the ship was fired upon by "flying objects," not mines.

CBS News said:

"Company president Yutaka Katada said Friday he believes the flying objects seen by the sailors could have been bullets. He denied any possibility of mines or torpedoes because the damage was above the ship's waterline. He called reports of a mine attack "false.""

The Washington Post in an article entitled "Trump rejects Iran’s denials that it attacked tankers, citing video released by Central Command" wrote:

"the head of the Japanese shipping company that owns one of the targeted tankers challenged the U.S. assertion that the vessel was attacked with limpet mines. He said Friday that the crew reported it was hit by “a flying object.”"

The New York Times reported:

"One of the tankers that were attacked in the Gulf of Oman was struck by a flying object, the ship’s Japanese operator said on Friday, expressing doubt that a mine had been attached to its hull."

In 2005 Israel publicly acknowledged carrying out a 1954 attack on American targets in the Middle East, known as the Lavon Affair, in which Israeli operatives planted bombs which were then falsely blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood.

And in 1967, in a still highly disputed incident, the crew of a US surveillance ship, the USS Liberty, say a 75 minute attack by Israeli warplanes was deliberate. The attack expended hundreds of rounds of cannon fire, rockets, napalm, machine-gun fire at lifeboats, and a torpedo from an Israeli patrol boat. It has been opined by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Navy Admiral Thomas Moorer, that the attack may have been intended to draw the US into war with Egypt.

The attack killed 34 US sailors and wounded hundreds of others.

The Israeli newspaper Haraatz on last May 20th ran an article entitled "Netanyahu's Iran Dilemma: Getting Trump to Act Without Putting Israel on the Front Line" states:

"Even if Trump's instinct tells him it's best to avoid war with Iran, no one can be certain of his intentions - not even Netanyahu."

The Israeli secret service, the Mossad, previously proclaimed the slogan "by way of deception thou shalt make war." It has been changed to “without deception, a nation falls.”

In 2007, former commander of NATO and former presidential candidate General Wes Clark made waves when he told an audience that a series of regime changes had been planned by the Pentagon since even before the invasion of Iraq. Clark said a general within the Bush Administration told him before the invasion.

And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."

The video of so called proof that it was the Iranians is a joke.

That video is so blurry and grainy that no one can really see what is happening or who is in the shot. The claim that it's video of Iranians removing mines from the ship is beyond insulting to anyone who has a working brain. No one goes back to the scene of the crime immediately to retrieve a mine. They come up with video yet they don't have security in place after the attack? That is so ridiculous it's insulting to intelligent people.

I agree with the article, Saudi Arabia or Israel are responsible for this. I saw this coming last month.

I made the mistake in 2003 to believe the bush boy and Colin Powell. Mostly because we had the canceled receipts from reagan and bush the first selling chemical weapons to Iraq.

We've been through this before and it wasn't that long ago.

Add to the fact that trump lies through his teeth just about every time he speaks.

I won't fall for the lies again.

I have no reason to believe that Japanese businessman is lying. I believe him.

You just had to prove you are a world-class moron, didn't you?

The boat was clearly Iranian. Don't you think they tracked where it returned to shore?

The mine was clearly removed by the crew of the boat.

The video was taken at long range by an aircraft. Didn't see that did you?

The Iranians knew that if the failed limpet mine was discovered, it would be a huge billboard pointing at who was responsible. They had to take a chance to recover it when it did not blow! As a result, the Iranian boat became the billboard!

The Norwegians and Japanese already explained this.
There was no limpet mine that was removed by the Iranians.
It was an magnetic ladder, and they asked the Iranians to help remove it.

Do you think anyone would be foolish enough to try to defuse and remove an unexplored mine from the hull of a moving ship? Nobody would be that brave or stupid.

 

[Rigby5]

The same paranoid schi

If you say so Adolph

YOU ARE A FUCKING IGNORANT LOSER. YOU OBVIOUSLY KNOW NOTHING ABOUT HISTORY YOU FUCKING LOSER.

HERE IS A QUESTION YOU FUCKING LOSER. WHY HAS ISRAEL NAMED A TRAIN STATION AFTER TRUMP IS HE IS A NAZI?

WANT TO TRY TO CHALLENGE ME ON WHAT KAPOS WERE YOU FUCKING LOSER? THAT IS WHAT I THOUGHT YOU FUCKING LOSER.

YOU DUMB FUCKING LOSER. YOU DUMB FUCKING IGNORANT LOSER.

I love it when I trigger Adolphs kid

Bye the Netenyahoo just named a new golan heights settlement after Trump. Biden is funneling cruse missiles to the palistinians to nuke it

On his last day in office, Obama tried to send millions of dollars to the terrorist entity to help them destroy Istral.

On his first day in office, Trump cancelled iy . I wouldn't say I necessarily became a fan of Trump that day, but I sure respected what he did .

Wrong Obama did send 4 billion to iran, because he is a crazy kenyan muslim

I am not wrong at all.

Obama attempted to send millions to the Palestinians on his last day in office and Trump cancelled it on his first.

Look it up.

Millions are peanuts.
We give Palestine about $200 million a year, and that just barely pays for their sanitation bill.
We give Israel over $5 billion a years, and while that still is not much compared to what the budget of any country it, that does buy a lot of lobbying in the US.

 

[Dale Smith]

You have NO fucking idea how it pains me to agree with you that the tanker attack was more likely than not a MOSSAD false flag. It wouldn't be the first, second, third or 4th time that they have done it starting with the USS Liberty. I believe that the MOSSAD was also behind the Syrian chemical alleged attacks.

didn't you believe it was the Trilateralists Lizard People.

What are "Lizard People", Joe Blowhard, the card carrying commie? Are you referring to leftards such as yourself? I have no doubt that you have snake-like features. You came into this world a gutless coward and you will be buried as one. Sucks to be you, Joseph. You are not even 1/10th of the man that you lamely attempt to pass yourself off as here.

(snicker)

 

[EvilCat Breath]

The Japanese clearly do not want our involvement. Let the Iranians do what they want.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Israel has a long history of staging False Flag operations in order to generate negative world opinion against its enemies. ...

Muslims have a habit of living up to those opinions

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

The Japanese clearly do not want our involvement. Let the Iranians do what they want.

The Japanese have a vested interest in appeasing Iran. Their oil comes from the Persian Gulf and any conflict there will hurt their economy.

 

[FA_Q2]

Your first link, Steemit-
Does it cost anything to post, comment, or vote?
No. It is free to post, comment, and vote on content on steemit.com. You might even get paid for it!

Your voice is worth something
Get paid for good content. Post and upvote articles on Steemit to get your share of the daily rewards pool.



Steemit.com is 5 months 19 days old and has a PageRank of 0 and ranking #18177 in the world with 20,355 estimated daily visits and a Net worth of $204,450 .The most visitors from United States, (second is Russia) The server location is in United States . Website is using "Nginx"

The first link has a link to...Japan demands more proof from U.S. that Iran attacked tankers - Japan Today

Did you bother to read it?

That link does not say in any form whatsoever that Israel could be behind the attacks. That is taking a statement made to refute the complexity as pointing to Iran and instead making it a claim that Israel may have been the source.

 

[FA_Q2]

Amazing.

It is flatly treasonous to disbelieve US intelligence.

Until they say something that you don't want to hear that is....

 

[sartre play]

Who ever what ever, just no war.

 

[Picaro]

Well, the terrorist fans' spin has moved on to new snivels and fake talking points; NPR trotted out their usual lineup of terrorist apologists to spout the new propaganda that 'Trump is threatening a war over a crummy little unmanned drone getting shot down', now, so they've already moved on to the next daily lie. Nothing to see here any more.

Terrorists are never at fault in DNC Land.

 

[Lewdog]

Japan Suggests Even Israel Could be Behind Tanker Attack, as President of Company Calls Pentagon Report Fake — Steemit

A source within the government of Japan has suggested that Israel, as well as the US itself, could be behind an attack on a Japanese tanker, according to the Japanese daily Japan Today.

In an article "Japan demands more proof from U.S. that Iran attacked tankers," the newspaper's online version reports:

If having expertise sophisticated enough to conduct the attack could be a reason to conclude that the attacker was Iran, "That would apply to the United States and Israel as well," said a source at the Foreign Ministry.

Liberal/progressive commentator Cenk Uygur of the popular program The Young Turks said on a show recently that only Israel or Saudi Arabia had motive to attack a Japanese tanker, in order to blame it on Iran, after the president of the tanker company called US claims that Iran was responsible "false." Iran has categorically denied any involvement.

Israeli hardliners have long advocated for US military action against Iran.

President Trump recently cited a video released by the Pentagon as showing what the Pentagon says is a limpit underwater mine being removed by a purported Iranian special forces crew. But observers with military backgrounds say that the video does not show a limpit mine, which is large, heavy, and conical, but magnetic ladder rungs used for climbing the sides of ships.

The president of the tanker company insists unequivocally that the ship was fired upon by "flying objects," not mines.

CBS News said:

"Company president Yutaka Katada said Friday he believes the flying objects seen by the sailors could have been bullets. He denied any possibility of mines or torpedoes because the damage was above the ship's waterline. He called reports of a mine attack "false.""

The Washington Post in an article entitled "Trump rejects Iran’s denials that it attacked tankers, citing video released by Central Command" wrote:

"the head of the Japanese shipping company that owns one of the targeted tankers challenged the U.S. assertion that the vessel was attacked with limpet mines. He said Friday that the crew reported it was hit by “a flying object.”"

The New York Times reported:

"One of the tankers that were attacked in the Gulf of Oman was struck by a flying object, the ship’s Japanese operator said on Friday, expressing doubt that a mine had been attached to its hull."

In 2005 Israel publicly acknowledged carrying out a 1954 attack on American targets in the Middle East, known as the Lavon Affair, in which Israeli operatives planted bombs which were then falsely blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood.

And in 1967, in a still highly disputed incident, the crew of a US surveillance ship, the USS Liberty, say a 75 minute attack by Israeli warplanes was deliberate. The attack expended hundreds of rounds of cannon fire, rockets, napalm, machine-gun fire at lifeboats, and a torpedo from an Israeli patrol boat. It has been opined by former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Navy Admiral Thomas Moorer, that the attack may have been intended to draw the US into war with Egypt.

The attack killed 34 US sailors and wounded hundreds of others.

The Israeli newspaper Haraatz on last May 20th ran an article entitled "Netanyahu's Iran Dilemma: Getting Trump to Act Without Putting Israel on the Front Line" states:

"Even if Trump's instinct tells him it's best to avoid war with Iran, no one can be certain of his intentions - not even Netanyahu."

The Israeli secret service, the Mossad, previously proclaimed the slogan "by way of deception thou shalt make war." It has been changed to “without deception, a nation falls.”

In 2007, former commander of NATO and former presidential candidate General Wes Clark made waves when he told an audience that a series of regime changes had been planned by the Pentagon since even before the invasion of Iraq. Clark said a general within the Bush Administration told him before the invasion.

And he said, "This is a memo that describes how we're going to take out seven countries in five years, starting with Iraq, and then Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and, finishing off, Iran."

Sooo Israel is creating events that can be blamed on Iran in order to give the U.S. a reason to destroy Iran and do them a favor?

 

[Lewdog]

Well, the terrorist fans' spin has moved on to new snivels and fake talking points; NPR trotted out their usual lineup of terrorist apologists to spout the new propaganda that 'Trump is threatening a war over a crummy little unmanned drone getting shot down', now, so they've already moved on to the next daily lie. Nothing to see here any more.

Terrorists are never at fault in DNC Land.

Trump himself said that the drone being shot down is not equal to an attack that will kill innocent people.

 

[Picaro]

Well, the terrorist fans' spin has moved on to new snivels and fake talking points; NPR trotted out their usual lineup of terrorist apologists to spout the new propaganda that 'Trump is threatening a war over a crummy little unmanned drone getting shot down', now, so they've already moved on to the next daily lie. Nothing to see here any more.

Terrorists are never at fault in DNC Land.

Trump himself said that the drone being shot down is not equal to an attack that will kill innocent people.

So it's Trump telling NPR's terrorist apologists what to say??? As usual your spin has nothing to do with what I said, so why cite my post if you're not going to address what it says? This is another reason why you deviants have no credibility any more.