- Thread starter
- #201
How does one “lose a thread”? Why are you embarrassed that you watch MSNBC?As if freedom of speech was part of the discussion.
Jeez, when you lose the thread, you really lose the thread.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How does one “lose a thread”? Why are you embarrassed that you watch MSNBC?As if freedom of speech was part of the discussion.
Jeez, when you lose the thread, you really lose the thread.
One loses a thread by being confused, meandering and lacking focus.How does one “lose a thread”? Why are you embarrassed that you watch MSNBC?
I am aware that you’re ashamed to answer a simple question. Happy Holidays, cowardly Colfax.One loses a thread by being confused, meandering and lacking focus.
Are you not aware of idioms?
You’re trying to make the thread about me. That’s a good indication you can’t discuss the topic.I am aware that you’re ashamed to answer a simple question. Happy Holidays, cowardly Colfax.
Why are they interviewing Garland? If they have no authority?
I get that but they are allowed to check one another. Hence we have checks and balances. Why else would Garland appear before Congress?
I am trying to gauge what you consider newsworthy. You’re reticent to answer as you’re ashamed.You’re trying to make the thread about me. That’s a good indication you can’t discuss the topic.
If he is in the middle of it he can still state who is and isn’t a person of interest or where they are in the investigation without revealing anything that may be proprietary. Instead he dodged it.oversight.
for inquiries about settled matters or policies. not ongoing investigations. did bob mueller appear b4 any committee & discuss russia etc when he was still in the middle of it? & bill barr refused to hand over the full unredacted report. the house judiciary & intel committees could only fact find based on a condensed report & the senate intel comittee did their own in depth investigation because they were in the dark too, per donny's order & subsequently - barr's.
If he is in the middle of it he can still state who is and isn’t a person of interest
You’re trolling.I am trying to gauge what you consider newsworthy. You’re reticent to answer as you’re ashamed.
He can say it in private. 100%. It has been done before. Instead he can play this card for years. Just never close investigations..:no he cannot - that is info directly attached to the investigation. you aren't gonna tip someone off that might try to cover his tracks if he knows he's in the feds' sights.
c'mon, zog - that would be the intro paragraph on day 1 of criminal justice 101.
Nope. You are. The topic is legit but you abhor Rogan so you lash out.You’re trolling.
Stay on topic.
He’s a nutjob TrumperRogan is a liberal and you still have not answered me and Rogan is not media, he is entertainment. So much for you being an honest debater.
I’m not the topic.Nope. You are. The topic is legit but you abhor Rogan so you lash out.
He can say it in private. 100%. It has been done before.
He is an entertainer who makes millions. Don’t hate. Appreciate.I’m not the topic.
I have little respect for Rogan. He does not strike me as intelligent or well researched.
Just sitting around wildly speculating is lazy.
It’s definitely not “truth”.
Just Google the Ukraine hearings. Happened all the time as I watched.gotta link with info, por favor?
My respect is not determined by the size of one’s bank account.He is an entertainer who makes millions. Don’t hate. Appreciate.
Just Google the Ukraine hearings. Happened all the time as I watched.
It’s determined by someone who thinks just like you doMy respect is not determined by the size of one’s bank account.