Jan Brewer may face recall election

[JakeStarkey]

Everyone knows that I support Romney first and then Huntsman. Wow. I am no type of Mormon, but those guys are head and shoulders above the rest of the field. Christie would be a good VP match. I am a Gerald Ford type of Republican. You can look it up.

 

[kaz]

Everyone knows that I support Romney first and then Huntsman. Wow. I am no type of Mormon, but those guys are head and shoulders above the rest of the field. Christie would be a good VP match. I am a Gerald Ford type of Republican. You can look it up.

I just see you defending Democrats and liberal policies and attacking Republicans all day. I don't need to look up what you've said other then that in the past. If you can't find any reason to question liberal policies or oppose Democrats who have reached the threshold of communism ala Europe in the 30s, then it's really hard to believe you're actually voting for any Republicans.

You listed some generic Republicans you like, what do you support in the Republican agenda? Be specific. Lots of liberals for whatever reason like to claim to be a Republican. But they can't list specific policies they agree with.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I do not defend Democrats. I rebutted Chris's post yesterday, for example. Anything in the center to you is liberal, so your concern does not matter. Strawman argument: accuse Jake of something he doesn't do. I don't support socialism; I do reject racism, birtherism, trutherism, and all those who ally with such. Don't like it? Too bad.

 

[Mini 14]

I do not defend Democrats. I rebutted Chris's post yesterday, for example. Anything in the center to you is liberal, so your concern does not matter. Strawman argument: accuse Jake of something he doesn't do. I don't support socialism; I do reject racism, birtherism, trutherism, and all those who ally with such. Don't like it? Too bad.

And he is a proponent of bigotry.

True story.

 

[kaz]

I do not defend Democrats. I rebutted Chris's post yesterday, for example. Anything in the center to you is liberal, so your concern does not matter. Strawman argument: accuse Jake of something he doesn't do. I don't support socialism; I do reject racism, birtherism, trutherism, and all those who ally with such. Don't like it? Too bad.

Right, you can't name specific parts of the Republican platform you actually support. Just as I thought. That is the answer to my question, not your spin.

And what is the deal with the constant use of the term "strawman" by people who obviously don't know what it means. Hello, GOOGLE the term...

 

[mudwhistle]

When Liberals WIN they gloat about how THEY WON.

When they lose they stomp their feet and cry for every Republican to be RECALLED.

how friggen funny.

I can't make sweeping accusations on that, but it seems to be the trend.

 

[mudwhistle]

All of you dumbass liberals are in a perpetual dreamworld. According to most of you, just about every Republican in numerous states are being recalled. GET A CLUE- YOU LOST THE ELECTION-- YOU WILL CONTINUE TO LOSE ELECTIONS- No one likes the far left agenda but you Marxists.

I seem to recall you rightwingnuts losing TWO elections prior.

it must be great to live in denial.

We sure did.

First thing we did was look at ourselves and try to figure out what we did wrong.

On the other hand, the left, and I'm not saying this is you mind you, is saying we're evil, we're breaking the law, that all of the seats that they lost need to be recalled, that their polls prove it.

It's all total crap.

Instead of looking at where they went wrong they instead look for angles to attack and tear down. They could never be wrong. Their deceptions and abuse aren't the reason why they lost in November. We just didn't get the message. Problem is we got the message loud and clear and we, meaning a majority of voters, rejected that message.

In all seriousness, the left hides it's true agenda. They can't be honest and open. When we find out what they're up to we reject their ideas because they make little or no sense at all.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Kaz, you are not the definition of purity of the right. If you ally with birtherism or trutherism or racism or the militias or any of that nonsense to the far right, you are not GOP.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Walker Scott and crew in WI are a group of Charlie Sheens who think they are somehow right. 100,000 WIs were out today protesting. The recall petitions are circling, and the counter GOP petitions against Dems are going nowherre.

You guys need to stay in reality.

 

[DiveCon]

Kaz, you are not the definition of purity of the right. If you ally with birtherism or trutherism or racism or the militias or any of that nonsense to the far right, you are not GOP.

please show a single post of his where he is supporting the birfer nonsense

 

[JakeStarkey]

Let him deny it. Perhaps the only thing I admire about you, dive, is that you have stated repeatedly the birther stuff is nonsense and wastes time. Nothing else so far to admire, but that part I will give you.

 

[kaz]

Kaz, you are not the definition of purity of the right. If you ally with birtherism or trutherism or racism or the militias or any of that nonsense to the far right, you are not GOP.

Can't answer a simple question can you because there is no answer. You say you are GOP, but can't tell me what specifically you support. This is where you libbies who play the "I'm a Repbublican game" always fail. Then when you get called out for it, you run away...



As for my views, I'm not a Republican, I'm a libertarian. I've said that repeatedly and we've been in many of the same conversations. Liberals always think libertarianism means Republicanism even though I'm against the wars and think drugs and prostitution should be legal because liberals are morons.

As for your questions, I've consistently argued against the birthists, never discussed trutherism but I've never supported any conspiracy theories so you pulled it out of your ass. I believe government is corrupt and unresponsive, but I don't believe it's staging anything. Your small government is racism connection is typical liberal moronic logic statement. And militias? While I oppose our government, hello dimwit, I believe in the...INDIVIDUAL. Militias are just anti government. You sure argue like a liberal for a Republican.

 

[DiveCon]

Let him deny it. Perhaps the only thing I admire about you, dive, is that you have stated repeatedly the birther stuff is nonsense and wastes time. Nothing else so far to admire, but that part I will give you.

here you go again, you make a charge and expect someone else to prove it wrong
you need to actually prove it RIGHT
this is why i have zero respect for you

 

[kaz]

Let him deny it. Perhaps the only thing I admire about you, dive, is that you have stated repeatedly the birther stuff is nonsense and wastes time. Nothing else so far to admire, but that part I will give you.

I'm not "denying" it, I've argued against the birthers in every discussion I've been in on the subject so there is nothing to support it and no "denial" is necessary. My position on that issue is (as I have repeatedly said) Obama won according to the rules as they were and he is President. I also believe he was born in Hawaii.

I have no problem with States in the future requiring proof of American birth as they do make the rules for Presidential elections in their State going forward, but it's too late for them to demand it now for the last one.

I think Obama is hiding something. But I think the only issue if it were released would be political and not change his qualification under the Constitution to be President.

Also obviously if a Republican President did this then unlike a minority of the Republican party the majority of the Democratic party would be absolutely screeching for the document and making up preposterous speculations as to why he wasn't providing it. But since it's a liberal, it's OK, only a nut would need it.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank you kaz for admitting you are a libertarian.

What you think constitutes GOP purity does matter in the slightest.

Move along.

 

[Jack Fate]

Thank you kaz for admitting you are a libertarian.

What you think constitutes GOP purity does matter in the slightest.

Move along.

Sarah Palin is enjoying life today. Does that piss you off?

 

[kaz]

Thank you kaz for admitting you are a libertarian.

What you think constitutes GOP purity does matter in the slightest.

Move along.

OMG, you're evading the question of what Republican issues you support again? I'm in shock. What is the deal with you libbies that you like to call yourselves Republicans and then criticize them for not being Democrats? This one's for you, dance, dance, dance...dance, dance, dance all night long....

BTW, I've said I'm a libertarian every chance I could. But I'm a heck of a lot more Republican then you are. Especially with the tea party and revival of fiscal conservatism.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Everyone knows that I support Romney first and then Huntsman. Wow. I am no type of Mormon, but those guys are head and shoulders above the rest of the field. Christie would be a good VP match. I am a Gerald Ford type of Republican. You can look it up.

google Jake's name...see what ya get.....i bet you wont see any Jake Starkey's saying they supported Romney and Huntsman.....

 

[Mini 14]

Everyone knows that I support Romney first and then Huntsman. Wow. I am no type of Mormon, but those guys are head and shoulders above the rest of the field. Christie would be a good VP match. I am a Gerald Ford type of Republican. You can look it up.

google Jake's name...see what ya get.....i bet you wont see any Jake Starkey's saying they supported Romney and Huntsman.....

Our Jake is nothing but a broken down, bitter, old bigot.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Everyone knows that I support Romney first and then Huntsman. Wow. I am no type of Mormon, but those guys are head and shoulders above the rest of the field. Christie would be a good VP match. I am a Gerald Ford type of Republican. You can look it up.

google Jake's name...see what ya get.....i bet you wont see any Jake Starkey's saying they supported Romney and Huntsman.....

http://www.usmessageboard.com/2068021-post113.html third paragraph notice the date and tell us what it is, HarryDresden