elektra
Platinum Member
- Thread starter
- #541
You are making me interrupt my reading of the timeline. The first thing I notice in the General's rebuttal, if I can call it that, is the general cannot state his case in accordance with the UCMJ. Is this an active General. I now got to dig up Title 10, Subtitle A, Part II, Chapter 47, in the United States Code, that is where the UCMJ is found. I am charging this officer, with conduct unbecoming of an officer. I need the code to see if I stated the law he broke.This OIG report that basically absolves the DoD is disputed by the general in charge of the NG that day.
How does he break the law that he was sworn to follow, the UCMJ. The first six paragraphs is pure political propaganda. The General repeats himself multiple times.
What was the need to repeat that it is false in so many ways. Only facts should be stated not all this crap designed to, dictating what we are to think before any facts are stated.
Marener (notice no name calling, you gave something with teeth), could you see how MAGA reading this will dismiss it before we get to the substance of the argument, or facts? It is written as political rhetoric.
myriad inaccuracies, false or misleading statements, or examples of faulty analysis
the violent assault on the U.S. Capitol
will also detail a series of false and/or misleading statements or documents
engaged in repeated violations
narrative formed and developed by LTG Piatt, and his close associates, and is fundamentally flawed
The DoDIG report is replete with factual inaccuracies, discrepancies and faulty analysis
It relies on demonstrably false testimony or statements
The focus of this memorandum is on the discrepancies and falsehoods
The danger is that if this report, with its glaring errors
All too often the DoDIG Report lacked accuracy and precision.
the imprecision and inaccuracy begins with the title