Jan. 6 Panel Unveils Election Guardrails To Prevent Future MAGA Election Steal

[SeaMajor7]

......this.

READ: Trump lawyer's memo on six-step plan for Pence to overturn the election | CNN Politics

John Eastman, a conservative lawyer working with then-President Donald Trump's legal team, outlined in a two-page memo a scheme to try to persuade then-Vice President Mike Pence to subvert the Constitution and throw out the 2020 election results on January 6.

www.cnn.com

Putting an end to an ubiquitous meme from Trump loyalists

It has been asserted hundreds of times by occupants of Trumpworld........the collusion hoax. It comes up in all manner of contexts. Most recently as a way to dismiss the 1/6 committee's work. Let's see what the facts say. Manafort conspired with Kilimnik to give the Kremlin internal polling...

www.usmessageboard.com

I'm just stating the obvious.
You have to live with yourself.

 

[scruffy]

Here's hoping.

Our democracy is in danger because a profoundly insecure orange con man can't admit defeat.

Yes, Donald Trump Said Even the Emmys Were Rigged

"Should've gotten it"

fortune.com

Oh shut up Mac.

Your idiotic bleating is getting old.

And tiresome.

No one cares.

No one cares about your orange boogeyman

 

[Mac1958]

Oh shut up Mac.

 

[Oddball]

Did you miss the news of the Trump/Eastman plot to throw the vote back to Repub controlled state legislatures?

Where is the guarantee that the legislature would have voted in Trump?

Cheney certainly wouldn't have done it, and there are enough Trump haters and moral coward in the GOP to call your *ahem* ASSumptiuon into doubt.

You moonbats are the biggest paranoid schizos around.

 

[Lesh]

I don't consider you the arbiter of credibility.

He's pointing out what we all can see

 

[Lesh]

Where is the guarantee that the legislature would have voted in Trump?

Well that WAS the plan. Would the GOP Congreesscritters have gone along with it?

Most would.

 

[Leo123]

He's pointing out what we all can see

Who's 'we all' you and your pet Iguana?

 

[Leo123]

Well that WAS the plan. Would the GOP Congreesscritters have gone along with it?

Most would.

Too bad they couldn't pull it off, after all, the Democrats stole the election and are in the process of destroying our Constitution as they have weaponized DOJ and FBI.

 

[struth]

The House Jan. 6 Committee on Sunday outlined its proposed reforms to the Electoral Count Act (ECA) to stop ex-President Donald Trump or anyone else from trying to overturn an election.

Committee vice chair Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) and committee member Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) announced in a Wall Street Journal op-ed that the panel will officially unveil its proposal this week that would “protect the rule of law and ensure that future efforts to attack the integrity of presidential elections can’t succeed.”

Then Cheney and Lofgren laid out the “four fundamental principles” of the committee’s proposed changes to the ECA.

The first principle strikes right at the heart of Trump’s election steal scheme: A reform that solidifies the vice president’s role in counting states’ electoral votes as purely ministerial, not one that has the power to hijack the process — which Trump, of course, tried to pressure then-Vice President Mike Pence to do.
Jan. 6 Panel Unveils Election Guardrails To Prevent Future MAGA Election Steal

One answer to the question, what purpose does the committee serve.

so they are acknowledging they need to change the law…because the law did exist…interesting

 

[whitehall]

Yeah but Biden won. Don't they understand that?

 

[Lesh]

so they are acknowledging they need to change the law…because the law did exist…interesting

Trump tried to abuse the ambiguities in the law. The Jan 6 Committee is recommending changes to make them more concrete so that they CAN'T be abused in the future.

 

[struth]

Trump tried to abuse the ambiguities in the law. The Jan 6 Committee is recommending changes to make them more concrete so that they CAN'T be abused in the future.

oh you use the law, to his advantage? haha

yes they are recomme son changes to the existing law that trump and his lawyers attempted to use…cause it was perfectly legal

 

[Lesh]

oh you use the law, to his advantage? haha

yes they are recomme son changes to the existing law that trump and his lawyers attempted to use…cause it was perfectly legal

English please

 

[berg80]

I don't consider you the arbiter of credibility.

Fine. That doesn't change the delusional nature of your claim.

 

[berg80]

Where is the guarantee that the legislature would have voted in Trump?

Repub controlled state legislatures. Guarantee? That's not the point. The point was the plot to nullify the vote of the majority of Americans.

 

[Oddball]

Repub controlled state legislatures. Guarantee? That's not the point. The point was the plot to nullify the vote of the majority of Americans.

No, that is exactly the point, douchebag.

You moonbat clowns keep whining and crying about Trump trying to"steal" the election by throwing the count to the HoR, when there's no certainty that he would have won there.

 

[Lesh]

You moonbat clowns keep whining and crying about Trump trying to"steal" the election by throwing the count to the HoR, when there's no certainty that he would have won there.

Nonsense. They were COUNTING on winning there and probably would have.

That count is not based on membership votes by rather by state.

Wyoming has the same vote as California. Republicans have the majority of House members in more states than Dems even though they have fewer members overall.

And don't even TRY to tell me that those GOP House members would care about the actual vote. They virtually ALL were claiming it was a stolen election

 

[struth]

Nonsense. They were COUNTING on winning there and probably would have.

That count is not based on membership votes by rather by state.

Wyoming has the same vote as California. Republicans have the majority of House members in more states than Dems even though they have fewer members overall.

And don't even TRY to tell me that those GOP House members would care about the actual vote. They virtually ALL were claiming it was a stolen election

huh? Cali has 55, Wyoming only has 3.....not sure where you are getting this disinformation

 

[Oddball]

Nonsense. They were COUNTING on winning there and probably would have.

That count is not based on membership votes by rather by state.

Wyoming has the same vote as California. Republicans have the majority of House members in more states than Dems even though they have fewer members overall.

And don't even TRY to tell me that those GOP House members would care about the actual vote. They virtually ALL were claiming it was a stolen election

You can count on shit all you want, that still makes nothing certain.

The GOP is chock full of moral cowards, who could well have voted to install Josef Stolen.....Liz Cheney certainly would have.

 

[jc456]

Numerous red states are trying to enact laws that would let state legislatures ignore your vote and “vote for you”

link

Lesh, you have zero dignity.