Jan 6 Committee SUBORNED PERJURY.. Stunning Information of Closed-Door Testimony Revealed.

That is reassuring. Your raving inanely had me concerned.
iu
 
I do not have a "side." The fact that so many witnesses who are giving sworn testimony are Republicans does not detract from their integrity and veracity.

Your imaginary witnesses aside, no on has refuted any of the sworn testimonies that have been presented, not in Trumpy propaganda media or elsewhere.

Your obsession with the House Speaker is misplaced. She is not in charge of the Capitol security forces that did not prepare properly for the Trump goons' attack.

You are parroting a fake claim by Trump Bum Kisser Jim Jordan who lacks the testicular fortitude to testify under oath.

Who told you that? The legend of Whispering Ray, the man who controls weak minds, has fizzled.

View attachment 668113
"Pssst! Attack the outnumbered police. Pass it on."
What is it with you people? The chain of command is clear. Pelosi owns the security posture that was taken, and the denial of troops authorized AND OFFERED to her. The House SAA reports only to Pelosi. The house SSA is the chair of the Governance board. (House SSA, Senate SSA, Capitol Architect) We know that requests were made by the CHP chief to the House SSA. We know there were requests from the DC police that Bowser declined. Either Bowser or Pelosi have to request the troop assistance which, PELOSI did AFTER THE RIOT.
Read the damn news reports... Schumer did not want Pelosi to get the proper police posture because they had demonized the police for three years and it would have been "bad optics" to protect themselves.

MY gawd your stating crap out of convenience and ignoring facts that disprove you...

So, tell me why Pelosi is not responsible prior to the riot and then does the very thing you state she is not able to do? DO you not see the irony of the lie you people have been spreading?
 
Last edited:
What is it with you people? The chain of command is clear. Pelosi owns the security posture that was taken, and the denial of troops authorized AND OFFERED to her. The House SAA reports only to Pelosi. The house SSA is the chair of the Governance board. (House SSA, Senate SSA, Capitol Architect) We know that requests were made by the CHP chief to the House SSA. We know there were requests from the DC police that Bowser declined. Either Bowser or Pelosi have to request the troop assistance which, PELOSI did AFTER THE RIOT.
Read the damn news reports... Schumer did not want Pelosi to get the proper police posture because they had demonized the police for three years and it would have been "bad optics" to protect themselves.

MY gawd your stating crap out of convenience and ignoring facts that disprove you...

So, tell me why Pelosi is not responsible prior to the riot and then does the very thing you state she is not able to do? DO you not see the irony of the lie you people have been spreading?
It is amusing that the Trump dead-enders need to contrive a diversion that does not focus on the significant central issue, the Trump goons' attack on the Capitol and other failed attempts to thwart democracy, but a fake pretense that the House Speaker is to blame for not being adequately prepared for the Trump goons' attack.


“As Speaker of the House, Pelosi does not direct the National Guard,” the AP reported in its fact check. “Further, as the Capitol came under attack, she and the Senate Majority leader called for military assistance, including the National Guard.”
... GOP Leader McConnell had similar authority over the security officials that day,” the AP wrote in its fact check. “But there is no evidence that either was involved in any effort to block the National Guard before or during the insurrection.”


 
Yep. Guy who wrote the letter she claimed to have written is “impeached” testimony.

SS denies her story and says the agents are available to testify. Why won’t Nazi call them to publicly testify?

LOLOL

Dayum, you're one retarded Masochist.

G'head, prove he wrote the note... :badgrin:
 
Your desperate attempt at diversion to this peripheral matter was addressed:

The US Capitol Police refused to accept help from the FBI and National Guard before President Trump’s supporters stormed the Capitol, according to a report.
The Pentagon offered Sunday to send guardsmen to help secure the perimeter and the Justice Department offered FBI help on Wednesday as the mob arrived, according to The Associated Press. Both offers were rejected.
Instead, despite plenty of warnings of a possible insurrection and ample resources and time to prepare, the Capitol Police planned only for a free speech demonstration.
The result is the Capitol was overrun Wednesday and officers in a law enforcement agency with a large operating budget and experience in high-security events protecting lawmakers were overwhelmed for the world to see. Four protesters died including one shot inside the building.
The National Guard and other additional security support could have been provided, but no one at the Capitol requested it.
Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.
Like Sund, Irving and Stenger have also since resigned their posts.
They wanted this event to happen and they let it. They needed it for the ongoing Trump smear
 
So this is what came out of your bombshell emergency hearing?

This? ???
This

The fact that Trump knew the mob he was sending to the Capitol was armed and not only approved of it but facilitated it and wanted to lead it
 
You're FOS.
Next, you'll claim that 88% of the people supported this.

View attachment 667632



I know, you think Tucker is "news" too.

July 7 2022
Tucker Carlson says he never intentionally misleads his audience and tries his “very hardest” to be truthful, but regrets that when he’s riled up on a topic, “I do tend to overstate.”

“When I get pissed, I do tend to overstate. I regret that. But, I don’t lie,” he said.

“When I screw it up, I correct it immediately if it’s a factual error. If my views on things change, I say that. I don’t pretend I didn’t used to think that. I admit it,” he said. “I mean, it’s hard for me to lie about it anyways because we have YouTube. But I, just as a matter of conscience, try to do that anyways.”


Republicans are hoarding these already.

View attachment 667633
That your preferred brand *****? You got given a link showing 88% of the country hates you. Then you pathetically go off topic and whine about Tucker.
 
So this is what came out of your bombshell emergency hearing?

This? ???

No, the bombshell testimony was that Trump knew the crowd was armed but summoned them to the Capitol because they weren't there to harm him.
 
What is it with you people? The chain of command is clear. Pelosi owns the security posture that was taken, and the denial of troops authorized AND OFFERED to her. The House SAA reports only to Pelosi. The house SSA is the chair of the Governance board. (House SSA, Senate SSA, Capitol Architect) We know that requests were made by the CHP chief to the House SSA. We know there were requests from the DC police that Bowser declined. Either Bowser or Pelosi have to request the troop assistance which, PELOSI did AFTER THE RIOT.
Read the damn news reports... Schumer did not want Pelosi to get the proper police posture because they had demonized the police for three years and it would have been "bad optics" to protect themselves.

MY gawd your stating crap out of convenience and ignoring facts that disprove you...

So, tell me why Pelosi is not responsible prior to the riot and then does the very thing you state she is not able to do? DO you not see the irony of the lie you people have been spreading?

You're deranged. The Speaker of the House is NOT in charge of Capitol security.

:cuckoo:
 
That your preferred brand *****? You got given a link showing 88% of the country hates you. Then you pathetically go off topic and whine about Tucker.

More people want Democrats to lead Congress than they want Republicans.
 
That your preferred brand *****? You got given a link showing 88% of the country hates you.
Sure, they do.
Then you pathetically go off topic and whine about Tucker.
So, RWNJ's regurgitate his lies.
Even after Carlson admits he lies.

You're part of the most gullible and stupid people on the planet.
 
15th post
Whoa. I hadn't heard that one.

It doesn't matter to the rubes (nothing does, obviously), but that will be a key piece of this.
Screen Shot 2022-07-10 at 7.18.32 AM.webp

The U.S. House Select Committee to Investigate the January 6th Attack on the United States Capitol has showcased a relentless procession of conservative Republican officeholders and Trump regime insiders presenting damning, corroborative testimony who provides a stark contrast with the deranged groupies who fester around the Cry Baby Loser's grievance jamborees.

Screen Shot 2021-08-23 at 11.49.56 AM.webp
Screen Shot 2022-07-10 at 7.47.22 AM.webp

As the revelations continue, I particularly look forward to the testimony of Trump deputy press secretary Sarah Mathews, and the further documentation of Trump's pleasuring himself for hours with the sordid spectacle of his goons attacking the Capitol.

Screen Shot 2022-07-10 at 7.37.31 AM.webp

No one can deny that House Minority Leader McCarthy's vow that the assault on democracy would not be swept under the rug is being admirably fulfilled.
 
Last edited:
Sure, they do.

So, RWNJ's regurgitate his lies.
Even after Carlson admits he lies.

You're part of the most gullible and stupid people on the planet.
You’re just an ignorant, no education, lying, pathetic moron who is desperate to deflect from the FACT that 88% of the country’s doesn’t like you or your policies. Your man crush on Tucker has nothing to do with anything. You are part of the dumbest, lowest educated, least skilled people on the planet. Keep spewing those talking points.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom