After all that Republican officeholders and Trump regime insiders have revealed under oath, Trump must be weeing his frillies over Cipollone testifying.
Someone wrote a statement for him to whine:
"Why would a future President of the United States want to have candid and important conversations with his White House Counsel if he thought there was even a small chance that this person, essentially acting as a 'lawyer' for the Country, may some day be brought before a partisan and openly hostile Committee in Congress, or even a fair and reasonable Committee, to reveal the inner secrets of foreign policy or other important matters, So bad for the USA!"
Of course, Cipollone is a pro, and would never reveal
"inner secrets of foreign policy or other important matters."
Cassidy Hutchinson testified that Pasquale said to Mark Meadows,
"Mark, something needs to be done or people are going to die and the blood is going to be on your f------ hands."
Honestly answering,
"Did you say that, or words to that effect, to Meadows?" does not in any way expose any privileged conversations with Trump or state secrets. There are a number of such pertinent questions he can address.