Jan 6 Committee SUBORNED PERJURY.. Stunning Information of Closed-Door Testimony Revealed.

[Lesh]

who obstructed what?

Already answered. Stop trolling

 

[jc456]

Already answered. Stop trolling

what post number?

 

[Faun]

This is a hearing. Hearsay is allowed.

It is only credible as corroborating evidence but nonetheless evidence

Not only is hearsay allowed in these hearings, it's allowed with grand juries in Georgia. Meaning any testimony offered in these hearings can be presented to the grand jury in Georgia looking into Trump's pressuring their Secretary of State to find votes for him to win Georgia.

Specifically since Trump's claim to Raffensperger is that HD believed he had won Georgia but the January 6th hearings have shown many people informed him their was no widespread fraud and that he lost.

 

[schmidlap]

oh for fk sake. can you challenge our posts or not?

Challenging raving such as "Those are opinions from CAREER SWAMP CREATURES" would be like challenging a primal scream. It is a subjective, emotional outburst, not amenable to rational assessment.

 

[Faun]

And any Judge would laugh your ass out of the court room for it.

You don't HAVE SHIT AGAIN..........Same shit different day..............And even if this happened it PROVES NOTHING,..........NADA..........ZERO........

It's not a crime..........Your party has again proven that it was your people that fucked this up YET AGAIN.........Proven that National Guard was rejected. And that Capital Police unlocked the doors and let people in.

Not to mention the FBI had agents egging it on.............Why are they tried for it.................hmmm???????

There's no evidence the FBI had agents egging it on.

Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.

 

[Billy_Bob]

She testified to many crimes.

Obstructing and Official proceeding of Congress being the main one.

What happened in the car could POSSIBLY be a misdemeanor if Engle were to press charges but he of course will not

He testimony in that regard was BACK GROUND concerning Trump's state of mind and his desire to join the Capitol Insurrectionists

You don't know much about testimony veracity... IF the witness is caught in one lie, then the rest of the testimony is worthless. IN this case Hutchinson was caught in three lies and the committee knew they were lies from previous testimony. This means they suborned those lies through perjury which they were a party too.

This whole schiff show is inadmissible in any court. The legal term is: "Falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus" which means "False in one thing, false in all things".

 

[jc456]

Challenging raving such as "Those are opinions from CAREER SWAMP CREATURES" would be like challenging a primal scream. It is a subjective, emotional outburst, not amenable to rational assessment.

sure, the challenge is to show ones from those who are not career swamp creatures. It's truly an abject lesson for you.

 

[Nuthin' Fancy]

hearsay, you bet. Post the definition. still waiting on you sugar.

Here retard.
hear·say
[ˈhirˌsā]

NOUN

1. information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.

 

[Lesh]

Most Common Hearsay Exceptions​

There are twenty-three exceptions in the federal rules that allow for out-of-court statements to be admitted as evidence even if the person made them is available to appear in court. However, only a handful of these are regularly used. The three most popularly used exceptions are:

1. Present Sense Impression. A hearsay statement may be allowed if it describes or explains an event or condition and was made during the event or immediately after it.
2. Excited Utterance. Closely related to the present sense impression is the hearsay exception for an excited utterance. The requirements for this exception to apply is that there must have been a startling event and the declarant made the statement while under the excitement or stress of the event.
3. Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition. A statement that is not offered for the truth of the statement, but rather to show the state of mind, emotion or physical condition can be an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. For instance, testimony that there was a heated argument can be offered to show anger and not for what was said.

 

[schmidlap]

sure, the challenge is to show ones from those who are not career swamp creatures. It's truly an abject lesson for you.

The invasive weird worshipers, who have been eating away at the GOP since 2016, can dismiss all Republicans from 1854 until their appearance if their zealotry so dictates.

The cult is hysterical over what is being exposed by so many Republican witnesses.

 

[Lesh]

You don't know much about testimony veracity... IF the witness is caught in one lie, then the rest of the testimony is worthless.

If a witness is found to have lied the jury CAN ignore some, all, or NONE of that witness's other testimony based on other evidence supporting it.

In this case the witness has NOT been shown to have lied about anything. There are out of court CLAIMS of such but nothing else

 

[Billy_Bob]

Already answered. Stop trolling

Prove intent. I'll wait...

You idiots haven't got a crime. You're trying to invent one, just like Stalin did...

 

[Billy_Bob]

If a witness is found to have lied the jury CAN ignore some, all, or NONE of that witness's other testimony based on other evidence supporting it.

In this case the witness has NOT been shown to have lied about anything. There are out of court CLAIMS of such but nothing else

Testimony of an impeached witness is inadmissible and will be excluded from the jury's deliberations. Suborning perjury by the prosecution invalidates the whole proceeding and is cause for dismissal with prejudice. This committee has suborned false testimony from a witness knowing that it was false. They are party to the lie and deception. This whole show should be stopped. It's over.

 

[jc456]

Here retard.
hear·say
[ˈhirˌsā]

NOUN

1. information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor.

yep, hearsay.

 

[jc456]

Prove intent. I'll wait...

You idiots haven't got a crime. You're trying to invent one, just like Stalin did...

she can show the post # or else we proved her wrong.

 

[jc456]

The invasive weird worshipers, who have been eating away at the GOP since 2016, can dismiss all Republicans from 1854 until their appearance if their zealotry so dictates.

The cult is hysterical over what is being exposed by so many Republican witnesses.

what's been exposed exactly? The lack of an actual hearing? you got us there...... hahahahahahahahahahahaha when you all got nothing, follow the pages in here.

 

[schmidlap]

what's been exposed exactly?

Ignorance is bliss.

 

[jc456]

Ignorance is bliss.

you are indeed evidence of that.

 

[schmidlap]

Most Common Hearsay Exceptions​

There are twenty-three exceptions in the federal rules that allow for out-of-court statements to be admitted as evidence even if the person made them is available to appear in court. However, only a handful of these are regularly used. The three most popularly used exceptions are:

1. Present Sense Impression. A hearsay statement may be allowed if it describes or explains an event or condition and was made during the event or immediately after it.
2. Excited Utterance. Closely related to the present sense impression is the hearsay exception for an excited utterance. The requirements for this exception to apply is that there must have been a startling event and the declarant made the statement while under the excitement or stress of the event.
3. Then-Existing Mental, Emotional, or Physical Condition. A statement that is not offered for the truth of the statement, but rather to show the state of mind, emotion or physical condition can be an exception to the rule against hearsay evidence. For instance, testimony that there was a heated argument can be offered to show anger and not for what was said.

Hearsay testimony elicits corroboration.

Pasquale Cipollone is, undoubtedly, being asked about those aspects of Hutchinson's sworn testimony.

 

[schmidlap]

you are indeed evidence of that.

boo hoo. you are so mean.