This woman made white, left wing democrats very, very rich......and now, they will gladly march her to the Social Justice Warrior Guillotine in order to make anyone else who thinks science is science and women and men are different afraid to actually state this in public......
JK Rowling, the 54-year-old Harry Potter author, is under fire because she rejects that a biological male magically becomes a woman by simply saying, āIām a chick now.ā
Rowling has been thoughtful on this issue, sheās been compassionate, and sheās been science-based. She also believes, correctly, that this trans madness erases women and homosexuals. If there is no sex, she says, if sex is just a social construct, there can be no same-sex attraction, there can be nothing unique about being a woman, so those two identities are erased.
Further, say goodbye to womenās sports. These lunatic trans activists believe that any man who claims to be a woman should be allowed to compete against women with all the physical advantages that come with being a biological male. Among other things, no woman will ever win a weightlifting competition, foot race, or rowing contest again. Anything that involves strength or speed or parallel parking , the advantages all go to the āwomanā in the wig with five oāclock shadow.
And letās not forget how this trans madness affects the person suffering from gender dysphoria. Instead of giving these folks the compassionate and intense psychological care they so desperately need, we are patronizing the mentally ill and championing the dual horror shows of hormone therapy and surgical mutilationā which, in some cases, are irreversible and does untold psychological and physical damage, especially to the children of parents so eager to jump on this destructive fad they use Little Haroldās affection for the color pink as an excuse to give the kid breasts.
A bunch of book burners who work for Hachette have threatened to strike if the publisher does not blacklist JK Rowling
www.breitbart.com
Consequences. I keep telling you fools that you have freedom of speech. Not freedom from the consequences of that speech.
We have First Amendment rights, and **** the consequences. That's because we also have a little thing called the "Second Amendment" to put some teeth in it.
Rowling on the other hand, lives in the UK, which has neither.