Gay mom reflects on being the non-birthing parent & tells folks to check their assumptions

We are not advocating that you stupid shit! And this thread is about gay parenting, not transgender issure. Do you know the difference?
They are all eggs in the same alphabet basket.

I have had the opportunity to both form and follow gay families. The children grow up to be dysfunctional adults. Ironically with the same pathologies as children from any one parent household. Therapy helps.
 
why dont you care aboiut the needs of children that deserve a mother and a father??
I care about all kids who deserve a stable two parent home where both adults are there legal guardians. Same sex couples provide that security as well as heterosexuals do.

There is considerable research that shows that having opposite sex parents vs same sex parents is not a factor in chidrens social and emotional development. And not allowing gay marriage and same sex parenting will not increase the number of kids who have a mother and a father. If you have anything to contradict either of those points, bring it on
 
Last edited:
I care about all kids who deserve a stable two parent home where both adults are there legal guardians. Same sex couples provide that security as well as heterosexuals do.

There is considerable research that shows that having opposite sex parents vs same sex parents is not a factor in chidrens social and emotional development. And not allowing gay marriage and same sex parenting will not increase the number of kids who have a mother and a father. If you have anything to contradict either of those points, bring it on
children deserve a mother and a father,, not your selfish idea of what a family is,,

that research is complete bullshit and you sick mother fuckers know it,,,,
 
children deserve a mother and a father,, not your selfish idea of what a family is,,

that research is complete bullshit and you sick mother fuckers know it,,,,

First of all, the issue is not what kids deserve, it is what they need. What they deserve is subjective, What need can be and has been documented. You claim that the studies that show that they do not need a mother and a father are bullshit but you have yet to produce any evidence to support that and I doubt that you ever will.

In any case, if you were to be right, what DEXACTLT would you do-in terms of law and public policy -to ensure that more kids have a mother and a father./. To risk a high school cliche –Put up or shut up
 
First of all, the issue is not what kids deserve, it is what they need. What they deserve is subjective, What need can be and has been documented. You claim that the studies that show that they do not need a mother and a father are bullshit but you have yet to produce any evidence to support that and I doubt that you ever will.

In any case, if you were to be right, what DEXACTLT would you do-in terms of law and public policy -to ensure that more kids have a mother and a father./. To risk a high school cliche –Put up or shut up
and children need a mother and a father,,

a selfish gay person does not need or deserve to purchase a child
 
They are equal to heterosexual parents because that are in fact parents who nurture, love and protect their child. Who the fuck are you to decide what is normal??!! The definition of normalcy, of what a family is has evolved. Apparently, you have not evolved and probably never will

And what is that codswallop about having a boy? What exactly do you mean by that ?
What if a man wants to marry his daughter or son. And then if you claim that’s not right, they are to tell you “time for you to evolve.”

Two men in a relationship and two women in a relationship are not able to reproduce children.

It’s not something that you have to understand. That is a fact. we can all ask What if everyone in the world had these types of relationships. Well Humanity would cease to exist.


Their have always been homosexual relationships… and two people will love each other if that’s what they feel.

you talk about evolving. ..there was human sacrifice many years ago. Over generations of history, people have became more civilized or not actually of course, you can go back into early modern history and find all sorts of barbaric ways compared to the middle ages.
 
What if a man wants to marry his daughter or son. And then if you claim that’s not right, they are to tell you “time for you to evolve.”
Red herring, false equivalency and slippery slope logical fallacies Congratulations 3 falacies in one sentence. !. Society is build around the concept of two consenting adults who are not closely related. New families are formed when that model is followed. Consanguineous marriage is a major leap beyond the legal and social norms that we are accustomed to.. So, no I do not see this becoming an issue, but if it does, that we will go down the legal and social path ro determine if it is something that is desirable and acceptable as we did with same sex marriage.. Sexual norms and values does in fact evolve for many reasons .and the acceptance of gay marriage is part of that evolution, not the cause .In any case it is not a reason to deny same sex marriage
 
Two men in a relationship and two women in a relationship are not able to reproduce children.
So what? Many couples regardless of their respective genders cannot make a baby. If you are using that as a reason why gays should not be allowed to marry, then can we assume that infertal straight couples should also not marry? When and where has procreation ever been a condition of marriage? That dumb as argument had been tried many times in various case leading up to the legalization of same sex marriage nd failed miserably every time
 
This is a heartfelt story that illustrates the fact that, while we have come a long way, we have miles yet to go to achieve true equality and inclusiveness for gay parents





This woman should never have been judged in this way . Science fiction? Really? Is it science fiction when a heterosexual couple uses a donor ?


Also of note:



But there is a happy ending

I don't understand the need some people have to cast themselves as victims when they aren't.

Narcissism?
 
It’s not something that you have to understand. That is a fact. we can all ask What if everyone in the world had these types of relationships. Well Humanity would cease to exist.
Inane codswallop. The human species is not and will not be wiped out by homosexuality. There have always been gay people in about the same numbers as now. The only difference is that now, most are out. And by they way, gay people are not sterile. They have children in much the same way that many heterosexuals do when the ”conventional way” is not doable
 

Forum List

Back
Top