J.D Vance wants children to vote.

[JackOfNoTrades]

Who is going to beat Trump?

LOL. Anybody. Because it's Trump.

 

[Lastamender]

LOL. Anybody. Because it's Trump.

That is patently untrue now. You know it too. You guys cannot even steal this one.


Here is David Sacks posting a list of big names supporting Trump:

Ben Horowitz
Bill Ackman
Cameron Winklevoss
Doug Leone
Elon Musk
Eoghan McCabe
Ken Howery
Kyle Samani
Marc Andreessen
Jacob Helberg
Joe Lonsdale
Palmer Luckey
Peter Thiel
Shaun Maguire
Trevor Traina
Tushar Jain
Tyler Winklevoss
Come on in, the water’s warm. pic.twitter.com/tf09tsM6fg
— David Sacks (@DavidS

LANDSLIDE WIN? In Vast Sentiment Shift, It's Now OK To Support President Trump! | WLT Report

One of the most damaging effects of the (illegal and unconstitutional) J6 prosecutions, other than the obvious impact to each defendant, is the chilling effect this had on Trump support nationwide. Sure, almost none of us stopped supporting President Trump, and in reality it probably made us...

wltreport.com

 

[Moonglow]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

They can vote but not chose their sexuality.

 

[OKTexas]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

Has he submitted a bill under article 5 yet?

.

 

[Moonglow]

^^^ Left winger who supports a Party that advocates letting 4 year olds make decisions about whether they want to be sexually mutilated and fed hormone blockers babbling about Republicans being extreme n stuff.

Yet, that doesn't happen to four-year-olds.

 

[BULLDOG]

I disagree with allowing children to vote .

I'm sure most would agree with you, but that's who MAGAs chose for VP.

 

[Lastamender]

I'm sure most would agree with you, but that's who MAGAs chose for VP.

No one is perfect. The other policies he supports are very important to this country. And of course the usual hyperbole comes with the bullshit.

 

[Votto]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

He is 100% correct.

The future of the nation depends on it's offspring.

 

[BULLDOG]

Babies are good? Wow, you might be the first person I have come across that are opposed to that idea

You think voting babies would be a good thing?

 

[Votto]

I don't see anything you said in that MSN article or the video at the 20 minute mark.

Not surprised are you?

 

[OKTexas]

Not surprising, but MAGAs say they would be just fine doing away with one person, one vote.

Excuse me commie, weren't you freaks advocating 16 year old's voting not too long ago?

.

 

[Votto]

You think voting babies would be a good thing?

He never said that dolt.

Why not call him Hitler Jr. halfwit?

If you are going to continue to lie, lie big!!!

 

[BULLDOG]

I don't see anything you said in that MSN article or the video at the 20 minute mark.

I suggested 20 minutes to give you background and context of his remark. Go to 25 minutes to start at his actual proposal.

 

[Delldude]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

Whats the big deal?

You clowns have flooded the voting base with illegals.

 

[OKTexas]

I don’t think you understand hiw ranked choice voting works.

What do you fail to understand about "one vote", if it doesn't go your way, you don't get multiple mulligans.

.

 

[BULLDOG]

^^^ Left winger who supports a Party that advocates letting 4 year olds make decisions about whether they want to be sexually mutilated and fed hormone blockers babbling about Republicans being extreme n stuff.

The democratic party does not support 4 year olds making that decision, and neither do I. Where did you hear that crazy shit from?

 

[BULLDOG]

why are you mad some repubes are moving to your side

Post often. It's good for sane people to be aware of the crazy shit from you MAGAs

 

[BULLDOG]

Nope, it is mostly Dems pushing rank choice voting and that definitely isn't one person, one vote.

You are struggling now. Advocating baby votes sounds like the ramblings of a crazy person because it is.

 

[progressive hunter]

Post often. It's good for sane people to be aware of the crazy shit from you MAGAs

it took you 2 hrs to come up with that??

lame,,

 

[BULLDOG]

Weren’t democrats wanting to drop the voting age to like 16 or 14?

I'm not aware of that. We know Your VP candidate wants to let infants vote.