It's Weird How It Took 20 Years for Anyone To Notice Six Million Jews Were Missing

[Street Juice]

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

 

[The Duke]

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

Bubba, my friend's dad murdered a lot of people at Dachau. It was bad.
The Nazis had them warehoused in fucked up conditions.
He took home 3 dried Nazi ears on a dogtag chain and some weapons from that.
It happened.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

Go pedal your antisemitic bullshit somewhere else.

 

[strollingbones]

Go pedal your antisemitic bullshit somewhere else.

unfortunately this is what this board has become...stormfront light

 

[Bootneck]

There are assholes; there are scumbags and there are pieces of shit...then there is street juice. An ignorant and bigoted antisemite and holocaust denier with a brain the size of a peanut and a mouth so big he could suck on the Delaware Viaduct.

 

[luiza]

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

You have also noted that the idea of a Jewish Holocaust was not invented until after WW2 was over .
Let's keep it simple and suggest that the quoted number of deaths are significantly exaggerated .
And let's also note that this has given Jewish authorities ever since a huge opportunity to play the Sympathy card when others accuse them of playing, manipulating and exaggerating the Victim role at every possible opportunity .

Of course things that happened duringWW2 were horrific and unforgivable .
And though this in no way devalues that horror , the scale of atrocities was not as the mainstream now imagines and reports , and this is because of a deliberately exaggerated establishment narrative propagandised by Israel, and through Mossad backed up by a parroting US and UK .

Hardly surprising as it was these three groups that created modern Israel specifically as a means to control the Middle East and profit from a very rich oil region. .

 

[RetiredGySgt]

You have also noted that the idea of a Jewish Holocaust was not invented until after WW2 was over .
Let's keep it simple and suggest that the quoted number of deaths are significantly exaggerated .
And let's also note that this has given Jewish authorities ever since a huge opportunity to play the Sympathy card when others accuse them of playing, manipulating and exaggerating the Victim role at every possible opportunity .

Of course things that happened duringWW2 were horrific and unforgivable .
And though this in no way devalues that horror , the scale of atrocities was not as the mainstream now imagines and reports , and this is because of a deliberately exaggerated establishment narrative propagandised by Israel, and through Mossad backed up by a parroting US and UK .

Hardly surprising as it was these three groups that created modern Israel specifically as a means to control the Middle East and profit from a very rich oil region. .

another antisemite heard from.

 

[JGalt]

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

Yo look! It's Antisemite Sam.

 

[luiza]

another antisemite heard from.

Is that because you have poor eyesight or lack General Comprehension skills ?

But Facts can be tricky to handle when you are 100% Cognitively Rigid.

 

[SaxonJackson]

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

Awesome find!!! Nice investigative work. But most of the world is horribly brainwashed on this subject so you can expect almost complete and total rejection of your findings. Nevertheless ... truth is truth and facts are facts whether anyone likes it or not.

 

[frigidweirdo]

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

It's not odd at all

At the end of WW2 Europe was devastated. People spend a long, long time searching for people who were "lost", either dead or having moved somewhere else. In chaos it's impossible to find all the truth.

Even in 2003 and the Iraq War, we don't know how many people died. We guess. And that was with modern technology and a limited war in a limited place.

 

[1srelluc]

The scale of the slaughter was unfathomable at the time. While we talk of billions and trillions today a million of anything was not a number that most could even fathom back then.

Europe was in turmoil as there were millions of displaced slave laborers/homeless going to and fro.

Had the Nazis not been so meticulous with their record keeping I could easily see how the true scope of their horrid misdeeds could have been chalked up to war dead.

I don't think the Soviets ever came up with a firm number of the Soviet civilians that were killed.

 

[mikegriffith1]

What grotesque, astonishing ignorance. The murder of 6 million Jews was discussed at the Nuremberg Trials in 1945-1946. Dr. Wilhelm Hoettl, an Austrian-born official in the Third Reich and a historian who served in senior positions in the SS, testified about this crime. He repeated his testimony at Adolf Eichmann's trial.

On both occasions, he described a conversation he had had with Eichmann, the SS official primarily responsible for the logistics of the Jewish genocide, in Budapest in August 1944. Hoettl recalled how “Eichmann … told me that, according to his information, some 6,000,000 Jews had perished until then -- 4,000,000 in extermination camps and the remaining 2,000,000 through shooting by the Operations Units and other causes, such as disease, etc.”

How Many People did the Nazis Murder?

Behind the number of victims of the Holocaust and Nazi persecution are people whose hopes and dreams were destroyed. Learn about the toll of Nazi policies.

encyclopedia.ushmm.org

 

[1srelluc]

The Eichmann capture by the MOSAD in 1960 really amped-up a new generation's interest in the Holocaust and I suspect that was the reason for newfound interest 20 years after the fact.

 

[mikegriffith1]

The Eichmann capture by the MOSAD in 1960 really amped-up a new generation's interest in the Holocaust and I suspect that was the reason for newfound interest 20 years after the fact.

The Holocaust was discussed in the 1950s in the U.S. and Europe. David Hoggan and Paul Rassinier began publishing Holocaust-denial research in the 1950s. In fact, Rassinier began questioning the Holocaust in 1949. Rassinier's 1950 book The Lie of Ulysses, which cast doubt on the Holocaust, created considerable controversy.

 

[whitehall]

If you wonder how the Holocaust could have happened in a Christian society in Germany, look no further than the current college demonstrations today.

 

[Street Juice]

It's not odd at all

At the end of WW2 Europe was devastated. People spend a long, long time searching for people who were "lost", either dead or having moved somewhere else. In chaos it's impossible to find all the truth.

Even in 2003 and the Iraq War, we don't know how many people died. We guess. And that was with modern technology and a limited war in a limited place.

haha, right. We've all noticed how shy Jews are about broadcasting their victimhood.

FACT: There were more reports on "Nazi death camps" before the was ended than after, when they were "discovered" by the Allies.

 

[Street Juice]

Awesome find!!! Nice investigative work. But most of the world is horribly brainwashed on this subject so you can expect almost complete and total rejection of your findings. Nevertheless ... truth is truth and facts are facts whether anyone likes it or not.

Thanks. Encouragingly, views of the article on my substack have exploded. Everyone should subscribe. It's free.

 

[Street Juice]

Yo look! It's Antisemite Sam.

View attachment 1091464

Facts are antisemitic, kids.

 

[Street Juice]

You have also noted that the idea of a Jewish Holocaust was not invented until after WW2 was over .
Let's keep it simple and suggest that the quoted number of deaths are significantly exaggerated .
And let's also note that this has given Jewish authorities ever since a huge opportunity to play the Sympathy card when others accuse them of playing, manipulating and exaggerating the Victim role at every possible opportunity .

Of course things that happened duringWW2 were horrific and unforgivable .
And though this in no way devalues that horror , the scale of atrocities was not as the mainstream now imagines and reports , and this is because of a deliberately exaggerated establishment narrative propagandised by Israel, and through Mossad backed up by a parroting US and UK .

Hardly surprising as it was these three groups that created modern Israel specifically as a means to control the Middle East and profit from a very rich oil region. .

The Jewish slaughter 66 million Russian gentiles beginning in 1917 dwarfs the "Holocaust" in every category of atrocity.

Most Americans have never heard of it, even though it ended just 39 years ago. Guess who owns the world's media. The world's most accomplished liars.

Israel was created for the program of global Jewish supremacy. It has done nothing but cost the US and the UK both in blood and treasure.