It's Weird How It Took 20 Years for Anyone To Notice Six Million Jews Were Missing

I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.
Are you trying to say that the holocaust was hugely exaggerated or didn't even happen??
 
Israel, in particular, has used the Holocaust as a tool for protecting themselves.

Why shouldn't they? Jews have suffered thousands of years of attacks simply because they were willing to do something others weren't. Which was lending money for profit.

Just like Islam now, Christians couldn't lend money for profit. So they brought Jews in to do it. Then, when they didn't want to pay the Jews their money, they killed them, exiled them, had pogroms and vilified them.
It's possible you sincerely believe that because your yeshivas are run by sick and evil people.



Jehovah is whom to blame for Jews' usury crimes:
Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury: Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it Deuteronomy 23:19-20
In other words, practice racist banking and steal the gentiles' property. In fact, you can take control of entire nations that way:

The LORD shall open unto thee his good treasure, the heaven to give the rain unto thy land in his season, and to bless all the work of thine hand: and thou shalt lend unto many nations, and thou shalt not borrow. And the LORD shall make thee the head, and not the tail; and thou shalt be above only, and thou shalt not be beneath... Deuteronomy 28:12-13
I'm guessing that that probably had more to do with hatred of Jews throughout the centuries than some deadbeats wanting to abscond on their loans.

The Grand Dispossession
 
Holocaust deniers are scum and Jew haters. You ignore so much evidence and pretend it never happened.
All of the evidence of the Holocaust is hearsay. ALL OF IT. All of it by people whose god orders them to lie to the gentiles in order to enslave them.

When thou comest nigh unto a city to fight against it, then proclaim peace unto it. And it shall be, if it make thee answer of peace, and open unto thee, then it shall be, that all the people that is found therein shall be tributaries unto thee, and they shall serve thee. Deuteronomy 20:10-11
It is too bad so many of our people are so easily manipulated.
 
The evil Zionist regime are guilty of raising the doubts on the holocaust because of the genocide against the Palestinian people. The entire world condemns them and that encourages doubts on their history.

Other Jews can be decent people and shouldn't be tarred with the same brush! They don't deserve any doubting of their holocaust. Let it go.
 
The evil Zionist regime are guilty of raising the doubts on the holocaust because of the genocide against the Palestinian people. The entire world condemns them and that encourages doubts on their history.

Other Jews can be decent people and shouldn't be tarred with the same brush! They don't deserve any doubting of their holocaust. Let it go.
So I should swallow historical lies and fallacies if someone who benefits from the lie is a good person? No way.

What about all the innocent and decent Germans who are still paying reparations even today to "third-generation Holocaust survivors" for a crime that never happened in the first place? Where is your compassion for them?
 
I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.

^^^Another black lefty Holocaust denier. :rolleyes: We need to put you all on an island somewhere.
 
The Jewish slaughter 66 million Russian gentiles beginning in 1917 dwarfs the "Holocaust" in every category of atrocity.

Most Americans have never heard of it, even though it ended just 39 years ago. Guess who owns the world's media. The world's most accomplished liars.

Israel was created for the program of global Jewish supremacy. It has done nothing but cost the US and the UK both in blood and treasure.
The State of Israel was created by God to confirm the location of the coming Armageddon.

Ezekiel 5

3 Thou shalt also take thereof a few in number, and bind them in thy skirts.

4 Then take of them again, and cast them into the midst of the fire, and burn them in the fire; for thereof shall a fire come forth into all the house of Israel.
 
All of the evidence of the Holocaust is hearsay. ALL OF IT. All of it by people whose god orders them to lie to the gentiles in order to enslave them.


It is too bad so many of our people are so easily manipulated.
Eyewitness accounts are not hearsay nor are German officer testimony or documents, Further eyewitness accounts from soldiers freeing the camps is not hearsay either.
 
So I should swallow historical lies and fallacies if someone who benefits from the lie is a good person? No way.

What about all the innocent and decent Germans who are still paying reparations even today to "third-generation Holocaust survivors" for a crime that never happened in the first place? Where is your compassion for them?
You should be permitted to voice your opinion. I don't ask for opinions to be censored.

I had a friend who was a Polish child of around 10 years old in the mid-forties. He lived within eye sight of Auchwitz 2 and his comment on the holocaust was, '200,000 tops'.
He had a right to voice his opinion, in my opinion.
 
While Holocaust deniers are nutty, opposing free speech is far more crazy and tyrannical. Yet you claim to be an educated informed historian. Shouldn’t you know better?
Allowing a privately owned online forum to ban certain topics is not opposing free speech. Holocaust deniers are perfectly free to start their own online forums. They are also entirely free to publish magazines and books that present their views. They are free to start a social media platform and do podcasts that deny the Holocaust. They are free to host lectures and invite the public to attend them.

Now, if someone proposed outlawing Holocaust-denial forums, magazines, books, lectures, and podcasts, I would oppose such censorship.
 
Eyewitness accounts are not hearsay nor are German officer testimony or documents, Further eyewitness accounts from soldiers freeing the camps is not hearsay either.
It's not unexpected that the topic of the holocaust is being revisited today in Trump's America.

The benefit is that we can learn of the current tone in America as regards the people's will to save democracy, or the opposing will to usher in fascism.

This is regardless of the facts on the holocaust.
 
Is this still upstairs?


OP is a retard. A truth and history-denying retard.
 
I went to the website, newspapers.com, and searched for the number of mentions in US newspapers for phrases related to four major events: “atomic bomb” (for the US use of atomic bombs on two Japanese cities in 1945), “twin towers” (for the 9/11 attacks in 2001), “Pearl Harbor” (for the Japanese attack on the US Navy in 1941), and “moon landing” (for the Apollo 11 mission in 1969).

View attachment 1091449

As one would completely expect, there is a sharp spike in mentions of the event in the decade in which it occurred.

Then I did the same for four phrases that would be associated with the Holocaust: “Holocaust,” “Nazi death camp,” and “extermination of Europe’s Jews,” which I combined with the results from a separate search on “extermination of European Jews.”

Here are the results:

View attachment 1091451
Grossly implausibly, there is the event in the 1940s and there is…nothing until the 1960s.

Very odd. Very devastatingly odd.

Even more telling, the slight increase in the Holocaust terms during the 1940s occurred mostly before the end of the war—before the Allied discovery of the systematic extermination of the Jews that had been going on. For example, the term “Nazi death camp” occurs in US papers 516 times between 1943 and 1945 when the wartime propaganda machine was churning out boatloads of anti-Nazi atrocity stories, then drops by nearly 70 percent upon the actual discovery of the Nazi death camps?1 There’s just no way that could happen if there had been actual death camps in Germany or Poland or anywhere else under Nazi occupation.
nobody in US knew about Holodomor until 2014

 
It's possible you sincerely believe that because your yeshivas are run by sick and evil people.



Jehovah is whom to blame for Jews' usury crimes:

In other words, practice racist banking and steal the gentiles' property. In fact, you can take control of entire nations that way:


I'm guessing that that probably had more to do with hatred of Jews throughout the centuries than some deadbeats wanting to abscond on their loans.

The Grand Dispossession


Wow, that was such a long post in order to say NOTHING. Well done.
 
Wow, that was such a long post in order to say NOTHING. Well done.
LOL, yeah, I provided video evidence of my point and quoted from the founding document of Judaism. Face it, Shlomo. All the arguments are on our side. You are relegated to the point-and-sputter crowd.
 
LOL, yeah, I provided video evidence of my point and quoted from the founding document of Judaism. Face it, Shlomo. All the arguments are on our side. You are relegated to the point-and-sputter crowd.

Oh wow, you provided a VIDEO... well, that must mean your argument makes sense.



Look, here's my argument about how your post is nonsense. AND I PROVIDED A VIDEO about buildings in Berlin, that I happen to be watching.
 
That's because it was engineered by Jews against the Russians.
you just can´t be more wrong,
edit for you:
1) By Muscovite (pedofile stalin- jugashvili saw himself as a newborn Muscovite) , imperialistic Marxists
2) against ethnic Ukrainians, mostly



 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom