It's vitally important for the sake of our democracy, especially after all the damage inflicted by Trump,.......

[berg80]

........that the American people view Trump's trial as fair and impartial. For that reason, Judge Aileen Cannon must at least consider recusing herself. Not because Trump appointed her, but because of her previous rulings in his favor.

The criminal case against President Donald J. Trump over his hoarding of classified documents was randomly assigned to Judge Aileen M. Cannon, a court official for the Southern District of Florida said on Saturday.

The chief clerk of the federal court system there, Angela E. Noble, also confirmed that Judge Cannon would continue to oversee the case unless she recused herself.

The news of Judge Cannon’s assignment raised eyebrows because of her role in an earlier lawsuit filed by Mr. Trump challenging the F.B.I.’s search of his Florida club and estate, Mar-a-Lago. In issuing a series of rulings favorable to him, Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, effectively disrupted the investigation until a conservative appeals court ruled she never had legitimate legal authority to intervene.

Trump Appointee Will Remain Judge in Documents Case, Clerk Says

The chief clerk of the courts for the Southern District of Florida added that Judge Aileen M. Cannon had been randomly assigned to the case.

www.nytimes.com

My personal opinion is the evidence is so strong even a biased judge can't change the verdict. But for the sake of keeping the proceeding beyond reproach she should back away.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

"My Democracy, My Democracy!"

Jesus Christ, this is what it looks like when you mainline CNN.

 

[berg80]

"My Democracy, My Democracy!"

Jesus Christ, this is what it looks like when you mainline CNN.

It's vitally important for the sake of our democracy​

Next.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

It's vitally important for the sake of our democracy​

Next.

Yes.

Sorry.

It's vitally important for the sake of "OUR" democracy that we attempt to jail our political opponent for the fourth or fifth time, after failing to again and again - for something that we actually already did and in far worse capacity as we did not have the power to declassify documents. (Hillary, Biden, etc.)

It is vitally important for the sake of "OUR" democracy that we censor any views that differ from our own, keep political prisoners from Jan. 6th locked up even though we haven't charged any of them with "INSURRECTION!".

It is vitally important for "OUR" democracy that we have a wide open border, the risk of nuclear war with Russia, and perversions taught to our children across public schools. And don't forget massive inflation.

You're fucking completely broken, and so is what is left of the elitist technocrat warmongers running the Democrat Party and the Establishment pretending to be "the RESISTANCE!"

Sad.

 

[1srelluc]

........that the American people view Trump's trial as fair and impartial. For that reason, Judge Aileen Cannon must at least consider recusing herself. Not because Trump appointed her, but because of her previous rulings in his favor.

The criminal case against President Donald J. Trump over his hoarding of classified documents was randomly assigned to Judge Aileen M. Cannon, a court official for the Southern District of Florida said on Saturday.

The chief clerk of the federal court system there, Angela E. Noble, also confirmed that Judge Cannon would continue to oversee the case unless she recused herself.

The news of Judge Cannon’s assignment raised eyebrows because of her role in an earlier lawsuit filed by Mr. Trump challenging the F.B.I.’s search of his Florida club and estate, Mar-a-Lago. In issuing a series of rulings favorable to him, Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, effectively disrupted the investigation until a conservative appeals court ruled she never had legitimate legal authority to intervene.

Trump Appointee Will Remain Judge in Documents Case, Clerk Says

The chief clerk of the courts for the Southern District of Florida added that Judge Aileen M. Cannon had been randomly assigned to the case.

www.nytimes.com

My personal opinion is the evidence is so strong even a biased judge can't change the verdict. But for the sake of keeping the proceeding beyond reproach she should back away.

 

[JusticeHammer]

It's vitally important for the sake of our democracy​

Next.

This is a constitutional republic not a democracy. Idiot libscum.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

This is a constitutional republic not a democracy. Idiot libscum.

They're "reimagining" that.

 

[berg80]

It's vitally important for the sake of "OUR" democracy that we attempt to jail our political opponent for the fourth or fifth time

The impeachments were not about jail time but rather removal from office. As for the civil and criminal indictments, "our" democracy is not served by turning a blind eye to criminality, even by a former prez. Some would say especially by a former prez.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

The impeachments were not about jail time but rather removal from office. As for the civil and criminal indictments, "our" democracy is not served by turning a blind eye to criminality, even by a former prez. Some would say especially by a former prez.

It's like talking to an inanimate object.

Only less interesting.

 

[berg80]

Judge Cannon, a Trump appointee, effectively disrupted the investigation until a conservative appeals court ruled she never had legitimate legal authority to intervene.

We're talking about a judge who was ignorant of the law. Do we really want her to oversee the first criminal case of a former prez?

 

[1srelluc]

Smart cookie right there....He will make a fine cabinet member for the gop winner.

 

[berg80]

It's like talking to an inanimate object.

Only less interesting.

Don't be so hard on yourself.

 

[berg80]

Who cares?

 

[SeaMajor7]

PANIC MODE!!!
OP----->

 

[berg80]

PANIC MODE!!!
OP----->

See post #10.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

The impeachments were not about jail time but rather removal from office. As for the civil and criminal indictments, "our" democracy is not served by turning a blind eye to criminality, even by a former prez. Some would say especially by a former prez.

Isnt overthrowing a President, insurrection against the government? I think it is, you demscums are what is destroying democracy.

 

[SeaMajor7]

See post #10.

See the last seven years!
You demented avenger subverted demoralized zombies are NUTS!!!
And, the SUBVERTED Fed is out of control.

 

[1srelluc]

Who cares?

Those that care about real justice, not dem vindictive "justice".

 

[berg80]

Isnt overthrowing a President, insurrection against the government? I think it is, you demscums are what is destroying democracy.

When did I suggest an insurrection against Biden?

WASHINGTON — A scathing decision on Thursday by a federal appeals court panel that shut down a lower court judge’s interference in a criminal investigation involving former President Donald J. Trump has highlighted a question: Is there such a thing as a Trump judge?

The case pitted one Trump appointee against two others. On one side was Judge Aileen M. Cannon of the Southern District of Florida, who legal experts across the ideological spectrum said showed unusual solicitude to the former president. On the other were two of the three judges who overturned her, Andrew L. Brasher and Britt Grant, who said she had greatly overstepped her authority in getting involved.

Two Trump-Appointed Judges Rebuke a Third for Bending the Law in His Favor (Published 2022)

The reversal of a district judge’s intervention in the Mar-a-Lago documents investigation shows the complexity of former President Donald J. Trump’s judicial legacy.

www.nytimes.com

 

[Harry Dresden]

The impeachments were not about jail time but rather removal from office. As for the civil and criminal indictments, "our" democracy is not served by turning a blind eye to criminality, even by a former prez. Some would say especially by a former prez.

so pick a judge that you like...right?....let the woman do her job berg.....