What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

It's Time White Republicans Stopped Lying to Each Other

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
47,488
Reaction score
12,419
Points
2,220
I tried to think of a better title, but this fits the description. People here read this trifling mess and believe it as if it's the gospel. So lets look at this article.

Truth: Democrats Feed Racism to Control Our Black Community
BY VINCE EVERETT ELLISON JUN 12, 2020

First off the title is a lie. If democrats were actually doing that rest assured that 99 percent of the blacks in America would be republican. Now as I am black, I think I have a fair understanding of how blacks would do things if this was the circumstance.

For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democrat Party, live and in living color. Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient: theft, incarceration, and killing.

The evidence produced from documentation show this comment to be inaccuate.

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. They cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.”This report also found that the over the top government response from president number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED found was that government intervened 3 times more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”


Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

A funny thing was discovered during these protests,(well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. Seems that most of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organization. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project- Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: Summer 2020

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3% of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported at all.

But since this doesn't agree with the narrative, it's pawned off as liberal psuedo itellectualism or liberal bias.

Outside this “Iron Triangle” government fails horribly at education, protection, health care, economic development, border security, drug enforcement and infrastructure. Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democrat Party abuse of Black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities. Why? Because this is what the Democrats desire.

Another lie. Let us look at how things were for blacks 60 years ago. At this time 60 years ago, we still has jim crow. Jim crow was ended by the signature of a democratic president and a majority democratic vote. Republicans had from 1897 to end jim crow and did not. 60 years ago more than half the black population lived below poverty thanks to jim crow that both parties were complicit in maintaning. But let me skip a few years so we get to the crux of this lie.. From 1994-2007 republicans controlled the house. From 2000-2007 they controlled Washington and upwards of 30 states. From 2010-2018 republicans controlled both houses. From 2017-2019 they controlled Washington and I believe between 33-37 states. So when we read a righht winger talk about democratic abuse of blacks, the facts show this to be a lie.

Blacks turn to the federal government because if we depended on states we'd still be slaves. There has been no democratic abuse of black America and furthermore on the local level, republicans have every chance to win mayoral races so if they lose, perhaps it's the policies. And there really are no democratic or republican cities, a mayor does nothing major without the city council and most city councils are bi partisan.

Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America. They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.

The fact that one-hundred fifty years since the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were ratified and fifty-six years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something: The Democrat Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans, not eradicate racism to institute justice. Ending racism would end the Democrats’ stranglehold on Black America.

The problem with this lie is that free blacks during slavery were republicans. For example, Frederick Douglass. The fact this "article" misses is the many different ways both republicans and democrats subverted the laws that have been produced. This writer is delusional and this story is nothing but a 100 percent fact free racist rant. Republicans aren't interested in ending racism, they exist just like democrats and they have the same political stregnth and do nothing but bitch about what democrats aren't doing for blacks.

This narrative plays well to a base of white aversive racists, but we black folk want to see policy. Refusing to end qualified immunity for police is not a policy that is going to get blacks to join the republican party. And the republican record on economic development is abysmal. The reason why we are still fighting to end racism is because there are whites who won't stop being racis and that's, republican, democrat, libertarian, green, whatever.

The proof of this charge is evidenced in a June 4, 2020, Washington Post story, in which a devastating critique highlights the Democrat Party’s dismal failure, in its fake effort, to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Heather Long and Andrew Van Dam write, “In many ways, the gap between the finances of black and whites is still as wide as it was in 1968.” The story illustrates the fact that in 1968 the average black household had $6,674 in wealth compared to $70,786 for a white household. In 2016 the typical black household had $13,024 in wealth vs $149,703 for a white household.

Instead of accepting the reality that whites have not stopped the racism and in fact practices a more covert form, this intellectually lazy individual blames democrats. His lie misses the fact that since 1968, we have had 6 republican presidents and 4 democrats. What have republicans done? They increased the wealth gap using that trickle down nonsense. You know, that great republican plan for prosperity whereby we cut taxes for the very rich and they would create jobs.

In 1968 this was the case:

“What white Americans have never fully understood but what the Negro can never forget--is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. It is time now to turn with all the purpose at our command to the major unfinished business of this nation. It is time to adopt strategies for action that will produce quick and visible progress. It is time to make good the promises of American democracy to all citizens-urban and rural, white and black, Spanish-surname, American Indian, and every minority group.”

50 years later the Economic Policy Institute determined that things rremained basically the same. This was not because democrats were using race to keep black voters. That's just a stupid assertion, anyone who believes this is crazy and their opinions on matters of race cannot be taken seriously.

But to say this guy is racist, gets the crazy, but:

According to the Brookings Institution if people do these three things, they have a 98 percent chance to stay out of poverty: Get a high school diploma, work full time, and wait until age 21 and get married before having a baby. The Democrats know this. So they have intentionally destroyed the educational system in the inner cities, introduced sex to our children at an early age, and set up and maintained a welfare state that continues to destroy the traditional family.

Democrats have forbidden the black community even the foundational elements of survival by violating their inalienable right to self-defense and religious expression. They have told them they are victims, oppressed and discriminated against.


Now this is pure racist bs. Blacks do all these things and whites have babies unmarried before 21. But staying out of poverty involves being paid wages that are above poverty. When black men make 80 cents on the dollar earned by white men even with the same academic attainment and doing the same work and black women 63 cents in the same set of circumstances, the comments above show the person saying it is clueless. Democrats didn't destroy anything and democrats have not forbidden anything for black people. White racism is bi partisan and that is the problem. Democrats aren't telling us this, we live the experience and see it for ourselves.

Considering the extraordinary amount of crime in the inner-city communities along with the constant complaints of police brutality, this is an interesting phenomenon. Nevertheless, Democrat politicians continually vote to disarm the “hunted” citizens and the black Democrats vote to be disarmed.

Whites are arrested every year for 70 percent of the crime in America. Annually they lead in 90 percent of the crime categories used by the FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. If anybody is told something it is whites who are republican. Blacks vote against guns because we see the killing and know that if we reduce access to deadly weapons, we reducing the shootings. The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go.

To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democrat Party, the black community is not being served, it is being occupied. This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there. And like a patient, after spending all of their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con-man, blacks are asking hard questions. And some are rioting.

The Democrats said, “If you give us your children we will educate them”; they lied.

They said, “If you get rid of your men, we will provide for you”; they lied.

They said, “If you give us your guns we will protect you”; they lied.


Blacks who rioted, did so because for the last 100 years police have been allowed to murder blacks and lie. For 100 years blacks were republicans. Racists like this who feed the white community this bs do not mention this fact. Democrats cannot occupy people who CHOOSE to vote. There are no democrats in voting places telling blacks to vote democrat before they enter a voting booth. This guy and others associated with this site and others like it are feeding crazy to whites and working to increase racial division.

Again, republican politicians run for office, but you are not going to get black votes when you are a politician telling blacks they can't think for themselves but must be told that racism exists so they can believe they are victims.

Republicans have been for more stringent policing of non white communities as well as enacting laws allowing whites to kill people of color claiming to be standing their ground. Republicans offer nothing, vouchers don't solve funding formula issues based on property tax values. The refusal to pay a national living wage ensures the continuance of poverty. Instead of looking at these things, people on the right like this guy, want to play identty politics and to white racial resentment.

Racism in America is no longer a government problem. There is no governmental statute in America that condones racism. Today, there are thousands of laws against racism, yet it still exists. Government cannot stop racism.

And here is the excuse racists use in order to absolve themselves of personal responsibility. There is a reason racism still exists, there are whites who refuse to stop being racists. Let me end with this comment:

“There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. Laws not only provide concrete benefits, they can even change the hearts of men—some men, anyhow—for good or evil.”

Thurgood Marshall
 
Last edited:

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
Joined
May 20, 2009
Messages
121,757
Reaction score
37,008
Points
2,290
From the "a black man who is both clean AND articulate is a rarity" Party

Also, who once said of Thurgood Marshall, "when I appoint a ****** to the Supreme Court, i want everyone to know he's a ******"?

1. Donald Trump
2. JFK
3. Nixon
4. LBJ
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
47,488
Reaction score
12,419
Points
2,220
From the "a black man who is both clean AND articulate is a rarity" Party

Also, who once said of Thurgood Marshall, "when I appoint a ****** to the Supreme Court, i want everyone to know he's a ******"?

1. Donald Trump
2. JFK
3. Nixon
4. LBJ
Irrelevant. We voted republican for 100 years and were rewarded with Jim Crow that republicans did nothing to change.

It's Time White Republicans Stopped Lying to Each Other​

 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
47,488
Reaction score
12,419
Points
2,220
“Times have changed and the worst enemy that the Negro has today is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and claims to be calling out liberals. Following these white conservatives will continue perpetuating problems that Negros have. The Negro cannot be taken, tricked or deceived by the white conservatives, and must continue to get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in 21st Century America, the history of the white conservative has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal is the one with the problem. Our problems will never be solved by the white man, liberal or conservative.” -- Malcolm X, 2021
 

Deplorable Yankee

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2019
Messages
10,299
Reaction score
6,920
Points
1,065
Location
DIXIE
I tried to think of a better title, but this fits the description. People here read this trifling mess and believe it as if it's the gospel. So lets look at this article.

Truth: Democrats Feed Racism to Control Our Black Community
BY VINCE EVERETT ELLISON JUN 12, 2020

First off the title is a lie. If democrats were actually doing that rest assured that 99 percent of the blacks in America would be republican. Now as I am black, I think I have a fair understanding of how blacks would do things if this was the circumstance.

For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democrat Party, live and in living color. Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient: theft, incarceration, and killing.

The evidence produced from documentation show this comment to be inaccuate.

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. They cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.”This report also found that the over the top government response from president number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED found was that government intervened 3 times more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”


Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

A funny thing was discovered during these protests,(well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. Seems that most of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organization. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project- Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: Summer 2020

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3% of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported at all.

But since this doesn't agree with the narrative, it's pawned off as liberal psuedo itellectualism or liberal bias.

Outside this “Iron Triangle” government fails horribly at education, protection, health care, economic development, border security, drug enforcement and infrastructure. Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democrat Party abuse of Black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities. Why? Because this is what the Democrats desire.

Another lie. Let us look at how things were for blacks 60 years ago. At this time 60 years ago, we still has jim crow. Jim crow was ended by the signature of a democratic president and a majority democratic vote. Republicans had from 1897 to end jim crow and did not. 60 years ago more than half the black population lived below poverty thanks to jim crow that both parties were complicit in maintaning. But let me skip a few years so we get to the crux of this lie.. From 1994-2007 republicans controlled the house. From 2000-2007 they controlled Washington and upwards of 30 states. From 2010-2018 republicans controlled both houses. From 2017-2019 they controlled Washington and I believe between 33-37 states. So when we read a righht winger talk about democratic abuse of blacks, the facts show this to be a lie.

Blacks turn to the federal government because if we depended on states we'd still be slaves. There has been no democratic abuse of black America and furthermore on the local level, republicans have every chance to win mayoral races so if they lose, perhaps it's the policies. And there really are no democratic or republican cities, a mayor does nothing major without the city council and most city councils are bi partisan.

Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America. They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.

The fact that one-hundred fifty years since the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were ratified and fifty-six years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something: The Democrat Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans, not eradicate racism to institute justice. Ending racism would end the Democrats’ stranglehold on Black America.

The problem with this lie is that free blacks during slavery were republicans. For example, Frederick Douglass. The fact this "article" misses is the many different ways both republicans and democrats subverted the laws that have been produced. This writer is delusional and this story is nothing but a 100 percent fact free racist rant. Republicans aren't interested in ending racism, they exist just like democrats and they have the same political stregnth and do nothing but bitch about what democrats aren't doing for blacks.

This narrative plays well to a base of white aversive racists, but we black folk want to see policy. Refusing to end qualified immunity for police is not a policy that is going to get blacks to join the republican party. And the republican record on economic development is abysmal. The reason why we are still fighting to end racism is because there are whites who won't stop being racis and that's, republican, democrat, libertarian, green, whatever.

The proof of this charge is evidenced in a June 4, 2020, Washington Post story, in which a devastating critique highlights the Democrat Party’s dismal failure, in its fake effort, to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Heather Long and Andrew Van Dam write, “In many ways, the gap between the finances of black and whites is still as wide as it was in 1968.” The story illustrates the fact that in 1968 the average black household had $6,674 in wealth compared to $70,786 for a white household. In 2016 the typical black household had $13,024 in wealth vs $149,703 for a white household.

Instead of accepting the reality that whites have not stopped the racism and in fact practices a more covert form, this intellectually lazy individual blames democrats. His lie misses the fact that since 1968, we have had 6 republican presidents and 4 democrats. What have republicans done? They increased the wealth gap using that trickle down nonsense. You know, that great republican plan for prosperity whereby we cut taxes for the very rich and they would create jobs.

In 1968 this was the case:

“What white Americans have never fully understood but what the Negro can never forget--is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. It is time now to turn with all the purpose at our command to the major unfinished business of this nation. It is time to adopt strategies for action that will produce quick and visible progress. It is time to make good the promises of American democracy to all citizens-urban and rural, white and black, Spanish-surname, American Indian, and every minority group.”

50 years later the Economic Policy Institute determined that things rremained basically the same. This was not because democrats were using race to keep black voters. That's just a stupid assertion, anyone who believes this is crazy and their opinions on matters of race cannot be taken seriously.

But to say this guy is racist, gets the crazy, but:

According to the Brookings Institution if people do these three things, they have a 98 percent chance to stay out of poverty: Get a high school diploma, work full time, and wait until age 21 and get married before having a baby. The Democrats know this. So they have intentionally destroyed the educational system in the inner cities, introduced sex to our children at an early age, and set up and maintained a welfare state that continues to destroy the traditional family.

Democrats have forbidden the black community even the foundational elements of survival by violating their inalienable right to self-defense and religious expression. They have told them they are victims, oppressed and discriminated against.


Now this is pure racist bs. Blacks do all these things and whites have babies unmarried before 21. But staying out of poverty involves being paid wages that are above poverty. When black men make 80 cents on the dollar earned by white men even with the same academic attainment and doing the same work and black women 63 cents in the same set of circumstances, the comments above show the person saying it is clueless. Democrats didn't destroy anything and democrats have not forbidden anything for black people. White racism is bi partisan and that is the problem. Democrats aren't telling us this, we live the experience and see it for ourselves.

Considering the extraordinary amount of crime in the inner-city communities along with the constant complaints of police brutality, this is an interesting phenomenon. Nevertheless, Democrat politicians continually vote to disarm the “hunted” citizens and the black Democrats vote to be disarmed.

Whites are arrested every year for 70 percent of the crime in America. Annually they lead in 90 percent of the crime categories used by the FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. If anybody is told something it is whites who are republican. Blacks vote against guns because we see the killing and know that if we reduce access to deadly weapons, we reducing the shootings. The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go.

To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democrat Party, the black community is not being served, it is being occupied. This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there. And like a patient, after spending all of their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con-man, blacks are asking hard questions. And some are rioting.

The Democrats said, “If you give us your children we will educate them”; they lied.

They said, “If you get rid of your men, we will provide for you”; they lied.

They said, “If you give us your guns we will protect you”; they lied.


Blacks who rioted, did so because for the last 100 years police have been allowed to murder blacks and lie. For 100 years blacks were republicans. Racists like this who feed the white community this bs do not mention this fact. Democrats cannot occupy people who CHOOSE to vote. There are no democrats in voting places telling blacks to vote democrat before they enter a voting booth. This guy and others associated with this site and others like it are feeding crazy to whites and working to increase racial division.

Again, republican politicians run for office, but you are not going to get black votes when you are a politician telling blacks they can't think for themselves but must be told that racism exists so they can believe they are victims.

Republicans have been for more stringent policing of non white communities as well as enacting laws allowing whites to kill people of color claiming to be standing their ground. Republicans offer nothing, vouchers don't solve funding formula issues based on property tax values. The refusal to pay a national living wage ensures the continuance of poverty. Instead of looking at these things, people on the right like this guy, want to play identty politics and to white racial resentment.

Racism in America is no longer a government problem. There is no governmental statute in America that condones racism. Today, there are thousands of laws against racism, yet it still exists. Government cannot stop racism.

And here is the excuse racists use in order to absolve themselves of personal responsibility. There is a reason racism still exists, there are whites who refuse to stop being racists. Let me end with this comment:

“There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. Laws not only provide concrete benefits, they can even change the hearts of men—some men, anyhow—for good or evil.”

Thurgood Marshall
Lol holy shit
Can you suck off the white progressives any harder ....

They hate you ...they really do
 

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
24,340
Points
1,905
Location
Arizona
From the "a black man who is both clean AND articulate is a rarity" Party

Also, who once said of Thurgood Marshall, "when I appoint a ****** to the Supreme Court, i want everyone to know he's a ******"?

1. Donald Trump
2. JFK
3. Nixon
4. LBJ
Irrelevant. We voted republican for 100 years and were rewarded with Jim Crow that republicans did nothing to change.

It's Time White Republicans Stopped Lying to Each Other​

Uh, Republicans weren’t in charge in the south during Jim Crow. That was all Democrats.

Blacks started voting with the KKK back in the 1930’s, all for the promise of welfare, which they didn’t even get because of....Democrat Jim Crow laws.

And oh boy, did things start changing for black communities when they started voting Democrat. Their divorce rates went up, then single mother rates skyrocketed, which in turn led to their kids being undisciplined, which led them to having the highest crime rates and incarceration rates.

So, keep voting Dem for another hundred years. I’m sure someday the fortunes of the blacks will turn around.
 

emilynghiem

Constitutionalist / Universalist
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
22,838
Reaction score
3,642
Points
290
Location
National Freedmen's Town District
Yes, the majority of Blacks used to be Republican.

During the mess with Democratic Party members in the South pushing Jim Crow laws
and opposing desegregation, there were splits and disagreements over
how many "Dixiecrats" and Klan influence fled to the Republican Party while
Black leadership started using the Democratic Party for representation.

I have heard Black historians blame Democrats for the poll taxes and opposition to Civil Rights laws.

Now I hear from Black Republicans that political favor was bought and paid for,
using the Democratic Party to buy people with social welfare benefits and keep them dependent on govt,
which started much earlier on historically than just the blame we see going on with today's politics.

Either way, if you blame Conservatives or Republicans, Liberals or Democrats:
The Liberal Democrats represent the belief in depending on political power through govt to establish rights and collective benefits for people.
The Conservative Republicans represent the belief in limiting government and restoring rights of people and states to govern themselves
as much as possible.

Both parties argue the other is "lying" and saying one thing to get votes and support,
but then do the opposite and sell out both their own constituents and betray and abuse taxpayers footing the bill for corruption.

Either way, even with corruption in both major parties,
if we can agree the BELIEF of Liberals and Democrats is depending on Govt to establish and regulate "general welfare for the public"
or STATIST central authority to mandate and control "collective resources and policies for the people"
and the BELIEF of Conservatives and Republicans is reducing and limiting dependence on federal govt
and maximizing the rights and liberties of individuals, in making democratic decisions through States,
then we can hold parties responsible for upholding and enforcing their promised policies.
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
47,488
Reaction score
12,419
Points
2,220
1621235819604.png
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
47,488
Reaction score
12,419
Points
2,220
From the "a black man who is both clean AND articulate is a rarity" Party

Also, who once said of Thurgood Marshall, "when I appoint a ****** to the Supreme Court, i want everyone to know he's a ******"?

1. Donald Trump
2. JFK
3. Nixon
4. LBJ
Irrelevant. We voted republican for 100 years and were rewarded with Jim Crow that republicans did nothing to change.

It's Time White Republicans Stopped Lying to Each Other​

Uh, Republicans weren’t in charge in the south during Jim Crow. That was all Democrats.

Blacks started voting with the KKK back in the 1930’s, all for the promise of welfare, which they didn’t even get because of....Democrat Jim Crow laws.

And oh boy, did things start changing for black communities when they started voting Democrat. Their divorce rates went up, then single mother rates skyrocketed, which in turn led to their kids being undisciplined, which led them to having the highest crime rates and incarceration rates.

So, keep voting Dem for another hundred years. I’m sure someday the fortunes of the blacks will turn around.
Jim crow was in the nort and the south.
 

harmonica

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2017
Messages
38,465
Reaction score
14,610
Points
1,560
I tried to think of a better title, but this fits the description. People here read this trifling mess and believe it as if it's the gospel. So lets look at this article.

Truth: Democrats Feed Racism to Control Our Black Community
BY VINCE EVERETT ELLISON JUN 12, 2020

First off the title is a lie. If democrats were actually doing that rest assured that 99 percent of the blacks in America would be republican. Now as I am black, I think I have a fair understanding of how blacks would do things if this was the circumstance.

For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democrat Party, live and in living color. Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient: theft, incarceration, and killing.

The evidence produced from documentation show this comment to be inaccuate.

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. They cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.”This report also found that the over the top government response from president number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED found was that government intervened 3 times more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”


Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

A funny thing was discovered during these protests,(well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. Seems that most of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organization. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project- Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: Summer 2020

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3% of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported at all.

But since this doesn't agree with the narrative, it's pawned off as liberal psuedo itellectualism or liberal bias.

Outside this “Iron Triangle” government fails horribly at education, protection, health care, economic development, border security, drug enforcement and infrastructure. Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democrat Party abuse of Black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities. Why? Because this is what the Democrats desire.

Another lie. Let us look at how things were for blacks 60 years ago. At this time 60 years ago, we still has jim crow. Jim crow was ended by the signature of a democratic president and a majority democratic vote. Republicans had from 1897 to end jim crow and did not. 60 years ago more than half the black population lived below poverty thanks to jim crow that both parties were complicit in maintaning. But let me skip a few years so we get to the crux of this lie.. From 1994-2007 republicans controlled the house. From 2000-2007 they controlled Washington and upwards of 30 states. From 2010-2018 republicans controlled both houses. From 2017-2019 they controlled Washington and I believe between 33-37 states. So when we read a righht winger talk about democratic abuse of blacks, the facts show this to be a lie.

Blacks turn to the federal government because if we depended on states we'd still be slaves. There has been no democratic abuse of black America and furthermore on the local level, republicans have every chance to win mayoral races so if they lose, perhaps it's the policies. And there really are no democratic or republican cities, a mayor does nothing major without the city council and most city councils are bi partisan.

Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America. They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.

The fact that one-hundred fifty years since the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were ratified and fifty-six years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something: The Democrat Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans, not eradicate racism to institute justice. Ending racism would end the Democrats’ stranglehold on Black America.

The problem with this lie is that free blacks during slavery were republicans. For example, Frederick Douglass. The fact this "article" misses is the many different ways both republicans and democrats subverted the laws that have been produced. This writer is delusional and this story is nothing but a 100 percent fact free racist rant. Republicans aren't interested in ending racism, they exist just like democrats and they have the same political stregnth and do nothing but bitch about what democrats aren't doing for blacks.

This narrative plays well to a base of white aversive racists, but we black folk want to see policy. Refusing to end qualified immunity for police is not a policy that is going to get blacks to join the republican party. And the republican record on economic development is abysmal. The reason why we are still fighting to end racism is because there are whites who won't stop being racis and that's, republican, democrat, libertarian, green, whatever.

The proof of this charge is evidenced in a June 4, 2020, Washington Post story, in which a devastating critique highlights the Democrat Party’s dismal failure, in its fake effort, to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Heather Long and Andrew Van Dam write, “In many ways, the gap between the finances of black and whites is still as wide as it was in 1968.” The story illustrates the fact that in 1968 the average black household had $6,674 in wealth compared to $70,786 for a white household. In 2016 the typical black household had $13,024 in wealth vs $149,703 for a white household.

Instead of accepting the reality that whites have not stopped the racism and in fact practices a more covert form, this intellectually lazy individual blames democrats. His lie misses the fact that since 1968, we have had 6 republican presidents and 4 democrats. What have republicans done? They increased the wealth gap using that trickle down nonsense. You know, that great republican plan for prosperity whereby we cut taxes for the very rich and they would create jobs.

In 1968 this was the case:

“What white Americans have never fully understood but what the Negro can never forget--is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. It is time now to turn with all the purpose at our command to the major unfinished business of this nation. It is time to adopt strategies for action that will produce quick and visible progress. It is time to make good the promises of American democracy to all citizens-urban and rural, white and black, Spanish-surname, American Indian, and every minority group.”

50 years later the Economic Policy Institute determined that things rremained basically the same. This was not because democrats were using race to keep black voters. That's just a stupid assertion, anyone who believes this is crazy and their opinions on matters of race cannot be taken seriously.

But to say this guy is racist, gets the crazy, but:

According to the Brookings Institution if people do these three things, they have a 98 percent chance to stay out of poverty: Get a high school diploma, work full time, and wait until age 21 and get married before having a baby. The Democrats know this. So they have intentionally destroyed the educational system in the inner cities, introduced sex to our children at an early age, and set up and maintained a welfare state that continues to destroy the traditional family.

Democrats have forbidden the black community even the foundational elements of survival by violating their inalienable right to self-defense and religious expression. They have told them they are victims, oppressed and discriminated against.


Now this is pure racist bs. Blacks do all these things and whites have babies unmarried before 21. But staying out of poverty involves being paid wages that are above poverty. When black men make 80 cents on the dollar earned by white men even with the same academic attainment and doing the same work and black women 63 cents in the same set of circumstances, the comments above show the person saying it is clueless. Democrats didn't destroy anything and democrats have not forbidden anything for black people. White racism is bi partisan and that is the problem. Democrats aren't telling us this, we live the experience and see it for ourselves.

Considering the extraordinary amount of crime in the inner-city communities along with the constant complaints of police brutality, this is an interesting phenomenon. Nevertheless, Democrat politicians continually vote to disarm the “hunted” citizens and the black Democrats vote to be disarmed.

Whites are arrested every year for 70 percent of the crime in America. Annually they lead in 90 percent of the crime categories used by the FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. If anybody is told something it is whites who are republican. Blacks vote against guns because we see the killing and know that if we reduce access to deadly weapons, we reducing the shootings. The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go.

To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democrat Party, the black community is not being served, it is being occupied. This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there. And like a patient, after spending all of their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con-man, blacks are asking hard questions. And some are rioting.

The Democrats said, “If you give us your children we will educate them”; they lied.

They said, “If you get rid of your men, we will provide for you”; they lied.

They said, “If you give us your guns we will protect you”; they lied.


Blacks who rioted, did so because for the last 100 years police have been allowed to murder blacks and lie. For 100 years blacks were republicans. Racists like this who feed the white community this bs do not mention this fact. Democrats cannot occupy people who CHOOSE to vote. There are no democrats in voting places telling blacks to vote democrat before they enter a voting booth. This guy and others associated with this site and others like it are feeding crazy to whites and working to increase racial division.

Again, republican politicians run for office, but you are not going to get black votes when you are a politician telling blacks they can't think for themselves but must be told that racism exists so they can believe they are victims.

Republicans have been for more stringent policing of non white communities as well as enacting laws allowing whites to kill people of color claiming to be standing their ground. Republicans offer nothing, vouchers don't solve funding formula issues based on property tax values. The refusal to pay a national living wage ensures the continuance of poverty. Instead of looking at these things, people on the right like this guy, want to play identty politics and to white racial resentment.

Racism in America is no longer a government problem. There is no governmental statute in America that condones racism. Today, there are thousands of laws against racism, yet it still exists. Government cannot stop racism.

And here is the excuse racists use in order to absolve themselves of personal responsibility. There is a reason racism still exists, there are whites who refuse to stop being racists. Let me end with this comment:

“There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. Laws not only provide concrete benefits, they can even change the hearts of men—some men, anyhow—for good or evil.”

Thurgood Marshall
..let me give you some advice---you post too much crap---just state your main points--concisely --no one is reading ALL that crap...if you state your main points, MORE people will read it.......
..and it is a bunch of RACIST babble ----you PROVE to be a racist
 

Decus

Gold Member
Joined
May 13, 2012
Messages
2,708
Reaction score
1,328
Points
200
Location
Banana Republic
“Times have changed and the worst enemy that the Negro has today is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and claims to be calling out liberals. Following these white conservatives will continue perpetuating problems that Negros have. The Negro cannot be taken, tricked or deceived by the white conservatives, and must continue to get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in 21st Century America, the history of the white conservative has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal is the one with the problem. Our problems will never be solved by the white man, liberal or conservative.” -- Malcolm X, 2021

Why change Malcolm X's words??? Why claim Malcolm would have said this in 2021 if he were still alive??? What he really said:

"So that anything that the Negro does is never for his own good, never for his own advancement, never for his own progress, he’s only a pawn in the hands of the white liberal. The worst enemy that the Negro have is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros, and calling himself a liberal, and it is following these white liberals that has perpetuated problems that Negros have. If the Negro wasn’t taken, tricked, or deceived by the white liberal then Negros would get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in America the history of the white liberal has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal was going to solve our problems. Our problems will never be solved by the white man. The only way that our problem will be solved is when the black man wakes up, clean himself up, stand on his own feet and stop begging the white man, and take immediate steps to do for ourselves the things that we have been waiting on the white man to do for us. Once we do for self then we will be able to solve our own problems"


.

 

EvMetro

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2017
Messages
4,959
Reaction score
2,787
Points
970
I tried to think of a better title, but this fits the description. People here read this trifling mess and believe it as if it's the gospel. So lets look at this article.

Truth: Democrats Feed Racism to Control Our Black Community
BY VINCE EVERETT ELLISON JUN 12, 2020

First off the title is a lie. If democrats were actually doing that rest assured that 99 percent of the blacks in America would be republican. Now as I am black, I think I have a fair understanding of how blacks would do things if this was the circumstance.

For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democrat Party, live and in living color. Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient: theft, incarceration, and killing.

The evidence produced from documentation show this comment to be inaccuate.

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. They cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.”This report also found that the over the top government response from president number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED found was that government intervened 3 times more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”


Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

A funny thing was discovered during these protests,(well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. Seems that most of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organization. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project- Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: Summer 2020

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3% of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported at all.

But since this doesn't agree with the narrative, it's pawned off as liberal psuedo itellectualism or liberal bias.

Outside this “Iron Triangle” government fails horribly at education, protection, health care, economic development, border security, drug enforcement and infrastructure. Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democrat Party abuse of Black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities. Why? Because this is what the Democrats desire.

Another lie. Let us look at how things were for blacks 60 years ago. At this time 60 years ago, we still has jim crow. Jim crow was ended by the signature of a democratic president and a majority democratic vote. Republicans had from 1897 to end jim crow and did not. 60 years ago more than half the black population lived below poverty thanks to jim crow that both parties were complicit in maintaning. But let me skip a few years so we get to the crux of this lie.. From 1994-2007 republicans controlled the house. From 2000-2007 they controlled Washington and upwards of 30 states. From 2010-2018 republicans controlled both houses. From 2017-2019 they controlled Washington and I believe between 33-37 states. So when we read a righht winger talk about democratic abuse of blacks, the facts show this to be a lie.

Blacks turn to the federal government because if we depended on states we'd still be slaves. There has been no democratic abuse of black America and furthermore on the local level, republicans have every chance to win mayoral races so if they lose, perhaps it's the policies. And there really are no democratic or republican cities, a mayor does nothing major without the city council and most city councils are bi partisan.

Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America. They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.

The fact that one-hundred fifty years since the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were ratified and fifty-six years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something: The Democrat Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans, not eradicate racism to institute justice. Ending racism would end the Democrats’ stranglehold on Black America.

The problem with this lie is that free blacks during slavery were republicans. For example, Frederick Douglass. The fact this "article" misses is the many different ways both republicans and democrats subverted the laws that have been produced. This writer is delusional and this story is nothing but a 100 percent fact free racist rant. Republicans aren't interested in ending racism, they exist just like democrats and they have the same political stregnth and do nothing but bitch about what democrats aren't doing for blacks.

This narrative plays well to a base of white aversive racists, but we black folk want to see policy. Refusing to end qualified immunity for police is not a policy that is going to get blacks to join the republican party. And the republican record on economic development is abysmal. The reason why we are still fighting to end racism is because there are whites who won't stop being racis and that's, republican, democrat, libertarian, green, whatever.

The proof of this charge is evidenced in a June 4, 2020, Washington Post story, in which a devastating critique highlights the Democrat Party’s dismal failure, in its fake effort, to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Heather Long and Andrew Van Dam write, “In many ways, the gap between the finances of black and whites is still as wide as it was in 1968.” The story illustrates the fact that in 1968 the average black household had $6,674 in wealth compared to $70,786 for a white household. In 2016 the typical black household had $13,024 in wealth vs $149,703 for a white household.

Instead of accepting the reality that whites have not stopped the racism and in fact practices a more covert form, this intellectually lazy individual blames democrats. His lie misses the fact that since 1968, we have had 6 republican presidents and 4 democrats. What have republicans done? They increased the wealth gap using that trickle down nonsense. You know, that great republican plan for prosperity whereby we cut taxes for the very rich and they would create jobs.

In 1968 this was the case:

“What white Americans have never fully understood but what the Negro can never forget--is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. It is time now to turn with all the purpose at our command to the major unfinished business of this nation. It is time to adopt strategies for action that will produce quick and visible progress. It is time to make good the promises of American democracy to all citizens-urban and rural, white and black, Spanish-surname, American Indian, and every minority group.”

50 years later the Economic Policy Institute determined that things rremained basically the same. This was not because democrats were using race to keep black voters. That's just a stupid assertion, anyone who believes this is crazy and their opinions on matters of race cannot be taken seriously.

But to say this guy is racist, gets the crazy, but:

According to the Brookings Institution if people do these three things, they have a 98 percent chance to stay out of poverty: Get a high school diploma, work full time, and wait until age 21 and get married before having a baby. The Democrats know this. So they have intentionally destroyed the educational system in the inner cities, introduced sex to our children at an early age, and set up and maintained a welfare state that continues to destroy the traditional family.

Democrats have forbidden the black community even the foundational elements of survival by violating their inalienable right to self-defense and religious expression. They have told them they are victims, oppressed and discriminated against.


Now this is pure racist bs. Blacks do all these things and whites have babies unmarried before 21. But staying out of poverty involves being paid wages that are above poverty. When black men make 80 cents on the dollar earned by white men even with the same academic attainment and doing the same work and black women 63 cents in the same set of circumstances, the comments above show the person saying it is clueless. Democrats didn't destroy anything and democrats have not forbidden anything for black people. White racism is bi partisan and that is the problem. Democrats aren't telling us this, we live the experience and see it for ourselves.

Considering the extraordinary amount of crime in the inner-city communities along with the constant complaints of police brutality, this is an interesting phenomenon. Nevertheless, Democrat politicians continually vote to disarm the “hunted” citizens and the black Democrats vote to be disarmed.

Whites are arrested every year for 70 percent of the crime in America. Annually they lead in 90 percent of the crime categories used by the FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. If anybody is told something it is whites who are republican. Blacks vote against guns because we see the killing and know that if we reduce access to deadly weapons, we reducing the shootings. The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go.

To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democrat Party, the black community is not being served, it is being occupied. This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there. And like a patient, after spending all of their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con-man, blacks are asking hard questions. And some are rioting.

The Democrats said, “If you give us your children we will educate them”; they lied.

They said, “If you get rid of your men, we will provide for you”; they lied.

They said, “If you give us your guns we will protect you”; they lied.


Blacks who rioted, did so because for the last 100 years police have been allowed to murder blacks and lie. For 100 years blacks were republicans. Racists like this who feed the white community this bs do not mention this fact. Democrats cannot occupy people who CHOOSE to vote. There are no democrats in voting places telling blacks to vote democrat before they enter a voting booth. This guy and others associated with this site and others like it are feeding crazy to whites and working to increase racial division.

Again, republican politicians run for office, but you are not going to get black votes when you are a politician telling blacks they can't think for themselves but must be told that racism exists so they can believe they are victims.

Republicans have been for more stringent policing of non white communities as well as enacting laws allowing whites to kill people of color claiming to be standing their ground. Republicans offer nothing, vouchers don't solve funding formula issues based on property tax values. The refusal to pay a national living wage ensures the continuance of poverty. Instead of looking at these things, people on the right like this guy, want to play identty politics and to white racial resentment.

Racism in America is no longer a government problem. There is no governmental statute in America that condones racism. Today, there are thousands of laws against racism, yet it still exists. Government cannot stop racism.

And here is the excuse racists use in order to absolve themselves of personal responsibility. There is a reason racism still exists, there are whites who refuse to stop being racists. Let me end with this comment:

“There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. Laws not only provide concrete benefits, they can even change the hearts of men—some men, anyhow—for good or evil.”

Thurgood Marshall
You can just fast forward through the commercials.
 

Turtlesoup

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
7,865
Reaction score
8,928
Points
2,118
I tried to think of a better title, but this fits the description. People here read this trifling mess and believe it as if it's the gospel. So lets look at this article.

Truth: Democrats Feed Racism to Control Our Black Community
BY VINCE EVERETT ELLISON JUN 12, 2020

First off the title is a lie. If democrats were actually doing that rest assured that 99 percent of the blacks in America would be republican. Now as I am black, I think I have a fair understanding of how blacks would do things if this was the circumstance.

For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democrat Party, live and in living color. Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient: theft, incarceration, and killing.

The evidence produced from documentation show this comment to be inaccuate.

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. They cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.”This report also found that the over the top government response from president number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED found was that government intervened 3 times more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”


Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

A funny thing was discovered during these protests,(well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. Seems that most of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organization. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project- Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: Summer 2020

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3% of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported at all.

But since this doesn't agree with the narrative, it's pawned off as liberal psuedo itellectualism or liberal bias.

Outside this “Iron Triangle” government fails horribly at education, protection, health care, economic development, border security, drug enforcement and infrastructure. Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democrat Party abuse of Black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities. Why? Because this is what the Democrats desire.

Another lie. Let us look at how things were for blacks 60 years ago. At this time 60 years ago, we still has jim crow. Jim crow was ended by the signature of a democratic president and a majority democratic vote. Republicans had from 1897 to end jim crow and did not. 60 years ago more than half the black population lived below poverty thanks to jim crow that both parties were complicit in maintaning. But let me skip a few years so we get to the crux of this lie.. From 1994-2007 republicans controlled the house. From 2000-2007 they controlled Washington and upwards of 30 states. From 2010-2018 republicans controlled both houses. From 2017-2019 they controlled Washington and I believe between 33-37 states. So when we read a righht winger talk about democratic abuse of blacks, the facts show this to be a lie.

Blacks turn to the federal government because if we depended on states we'd still be slaves. There has been no democratic abuse of black America and furthermore on the local level, republicans have every chance to win mayoral races so if they lose, perhaps it's the policies. And there really are no democratic or republican cities, a mayor does nothing major without the city council and most city councils are bi partisan.

Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America. They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.

The fact that one-hundred fifty years since the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were ratified and fifty-six years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something: The Democrat Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans, not eradicate racism to institute justice. Ending racism would end the Democrats’ stranglehold on Black America.

The problem with this lie is that free blacks during slavery were republicans. For example, Frederick Douglass. The fact this "article" misses is the many different ways both republicans and democrats subverted the laws that have been produced. This writer is delusional and this story is nothing but a 100 percent fact free racist rant. Republicans aren't interested in ending racism, they exist just like democrats and they have the same political stregnth and do nothing but bitch about what democrats aren't doing for blacks.

This narrative plays well to a base of white aversive racists, but we black folk want to see policy. Refusing to end qualified immunity for police is not a policy that is going to get blacks to join the republican party. And the republican record on economic development is abysmal. The reason why we are still fighting to end racism is because there are whites who won't stop being racis and that's, republican, democrat, libertarian, green, whatever.

The proof of this charge is evidenced in a June 4, 2020, Washington Post story, in which a devastating critique highlights the Democrat Party’s dismal failure, in its fake effort, to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Heather Long and Andrew Van Dam write, “In many ways, the gap between the finances of black and whites is still as wide as it was in 1968.” The story illustrates the fact that in 1968 the average black household had $6,674 in wealth compared to $70,786 for a white household. In 2016 the typical black household had $13,024 in wealth vs $149,703 for a white household.

Instead of accepting the reality that whites have not stopped the racism and in fact practices a more covert form, this intellectually lazy individual blames democrats. His lie misses the fact that since 1968, we have had 6 republican presidents and 4 democrats. What have republicans done? They increased the wealth gap using that trickle down nonsense. You know, that great republican plan for prosperity whereby we cut taxes for the very rich and they would create jobs.

In 1968 this was the case:

“What white Americans have never fully understood but what the Negro can never forget--is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. It is time now to turn with all the purpose at our command to the major unfinished business of this nation. It is time to adopt strategies for action that will produce quick and visible progress. It is time to make good the promises of American democracy to all citizens-urban and rural, white and black, Spanish-surname, American Indian, and every minority group.”

50 years later the Economic Policy Institute determined that things rremained basically the same. This was not because democrats were using race to keep black voters. That's just a stupid assertion, anyone who believes this is crazy and their opinions on matters of race cannot be taken seriously.

But to say this guy is racist, gets the crazy, but:

According to the Brookings Institution if people do these three things, they have a 98 percent chance to stay out of poverty: Get a high school diploma, work full time, and wait until age 21 and get married before having a baby. The Democrats know this. So they have intentionally destroyed the educational system in the inner cities, introduced sex to our children at an early age, and set up and maintained a welfare state that continues to destroy the traditional family.

Democrats have forbidden the black community even the foundational elements of survival by violating their inalienable right to self-defense and religious expression. They have told them they are victims, oppressed and discriminated against.


Now this is pure racist bs. Blacks do all these things and whites have babies unmarried before 21. But staying out of poverty involves being paid wages that are above poverty. When black men make 80 cents on the dollar earned by white men even with the same academic attainment and doing the same work and black women 63 cents in the same set of circumstances, the comments above show the person saying it is clueless. Democrats didn't destroy anything and democrats have not forbidden anything for black people. White racism is bi partisan and that is the problem. Democrats aren't telling us this, we live the experience and see it for ourselves.

Considering the extraordinary amount of crime in the inner-city communities along with the constant complaints of police brutality, this is an interesting phenomenon. Nevertheless, Democrat politicians continually vote to disarm the “hunted” citizens and the black Democrats vote to be disarmed.

Whites are arrested every year for 70 percent of the crime in America. Annually they lead in 90 percent of the crime categories used by the FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. If anybody is told something it is whites who are republican. Blacks vote against guns because we see the killing and know that if we reduce access to deadly weapons, we reducing the shootings. The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go.

To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democrat Party, the black community is not being served, it is being occupied. This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there. And like a patient, after spending all of their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con-man, blacks are asking hard questions. And some are rioting.

The Democrats said, “If you give us your children we will educate them”; they lied.

They said, “If you get rid of your men, we will provide for you”; they lied.

They said, “If you give us your guns we will protect you”; they lied.


Blacks who rioted, did so because for the last 100 years police have been allowed to murder blacks and lie. For 100 years blacks were republicans. Racists like this who feed the white community this bs do not mention this fact. Democrats cannot occupy people who CHOOSE to vote. There are no democrats in voting places telling blacks to vote democrat before they enter a voting booth. This guy and others associated with this site and others like it are feeding crazy to whites and working to increase racial division.

Again, republican politicians run for office, but you are not going to get black votes when you are a politician telling blacks they can't think for themselves but must be told that racism exists so they can believe they are victims.

Republicans have been for more stringent policing of non white communities as well as enacting laws allowing whites to kill people of color claiming to be standing their ground. Republicans offer nothing, vouchers don't solve funding formula issues based on property tax values. The refusal to pay a national living wage ensures the continuance of poverty. Instead of looking at these things, people on the right like this guy, want to play identty politics and to white racial resentment.

Racism in America is no longer a government problem. There is no governmental statute in America that condones racism. Today, there are thousands of laws against racism, yet it still exists. Government cannot stop racism.

And here is the excuse racists use in order to absolve themselves of personal responsibility. There is a reason racism still exists, there are whites who refuse to stop being racists. Let me end with this comment:

“There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. Laws not only provide concrete benefits, they can even change the hearts of men—some men, anyhow—for good or evil.”

Thurgood Marshall
Oh look another blame whitey article and poster...this time with useful idiots blaming their dem white overlords. You forget your place IM2 and forget who your master really is. The dem party (like Germanys nazi party) has their street thugs, anti-fa and their racist/terrorsts at BLM and other such "activist" groups, to serve the purpose of creating chaos and terror to further dem pols and their globalist puppet masters quest for power. The german nazis used to called their such groups the SA and their offspring the SS. The SA was headed by all things violent gay military men that used to burn, loot, attack, beat citizens, riot etc exactly like BLM and anti-fa do now-------but eventually the SA forgot their place as well and became a pain in the ass for the other german nazis. So one night, Hitler and his other cabinet members sent the SS and other nazis to get the SA to teach who their real masters were. The German Nazis (todays dems party) attacked the SA killing many immediately and rounding up and arresting the others of the SA who they then killed a short time later. Even if the Dems are successful IM2, they will eventually teach you again where your proper place is at.
 

MarcATL

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2009
Messages
30,638
Reaction score
10,521
Points
1,400
Powerful OP IM2,

As I always say, if Republicans didn't lie, they'd have NOTHING to say!
 

emilynghiem

Constitutionalist / Universalist
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
22,838
Reaction score
3,642
Points
290
Location
National Freedmen's Town District
Powerful OP IM2,

As I always say, if Republicans didn't lie, they'd have NOTHING to say!
Dear MarcATL
Yes and No. It is true they contradict their own principles: instead of solving problems directly among the people,
now the Republicans are in the same game they criticize of trying to get party leaders elected to GOVT positions to solve problems through GOVT.

However, the principles of Conservatives and limited govt are still correct.
Just because Republicans aren't all practicing what they preach doesn't mean the principles they betray are discredited.

The Republicans are just divided into 2-4 groups over how to restore this principle when the Govt is this corrupted and in need of legislative corrections from within. (by 2-4 groups I mean the people leaning Liberal and leaning Conservative, and within those two groups, people using either Liberal or Conservative approaches for the right reasons of wanting to restore govt by correcting abuses and problems, and wrong reasons of not trusting each other and falling prey to distracting and destructive bullying politics to try to take back the party, instead of focusing on the principles that unite the party)

This is similar to the message in Christianity being valid,
while the people claiming to practice or preach it betray their own cause.

If you judge the message by the messengers, of course, you would reject it.
Same with Conservative principles of self government, where individuals have rights,
then delegate these to State and to Federal authority through democratic process.

If people do not agree on policy, we revert back to the local level and reform laws
based on consent of the governed, to the highest level that we need to solve the problem while maintaining consensus.
If we don't agree by consensus, we need to separate and allow local jurisdictions to govern their own policies.

As for liberals, since there is no faith that people can govern ourselves directly by exercising and enforcing Constitutional laws,
the liberals rely on appealing all the way to federal govt if they fail at state levels.
This idea of democratizing and separating jurisdiction is not an option, because
liberals want the Govt to serve as central authority for uniform mandates to ensure
equal access and protection for all people under the same policy.

Conservatives argue this supercedes individual rights and undermines diversity.

Both liberals are right in the INTENT and GOAL of equal inclusion of minority interests
and not abusing "rule of law" to become exclusive, where only people with access and influence
can participate in defending representation and protections.

But the best way to achieve equal inclusion is to allow for diverse representation by party
instead of excluding Conservatives and other opponents of "statism" or centralized authority mandating "collectivist" policies.

Both groups have principles that serve a positive and critical purpose.

But the way the PARTIES are going about fighting to defend or impose their beliefs and principles
ends up CONTRADICTING their own principles. So both parties fail their own objectives and invoke criticism and rejection.

The PRINCIPLES are still valid, but not the method of establishing them by overriding other principles equally valid.
 

hadit

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2013
Messages
29,095
Reaction score
7,216
Points
280
“Times have changed and the worst enemy that the Negro has today is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and claims to be calling out liberals. Following these white conservatives will continue perpetuating problems that Negros have. The Negro cannot be taken, tricked or deceived by the white conservatives, and must continue to get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in 21st Century America, the history of the white conservative has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal is the one with the problem. Our problems will never be solved by the white man, liberal or conservative.” -- Malcolm X, 2021
You have to make up crap to make a point? How is that superior to those who misappropriate MLK?
 

theHawk

Registered Conservative
Joined
Sep 20, 2005
Messages
35,895
Reaction score
24,340
Points
1,905
Location
Arizona
From the "a black man who is both clean AND articulate is a rarity" Party

Also, who once said of Thurgood Marshall, "when I appoint a ****** to the Supreme Court, i want everyone to know he's a ******"?

1. Donald Trump
2. JFK
3. Nixon
4. LBJ
Irrelevant. We voted republican for 100 years and were rewarded with Jim Crow that republicans did nothing to change.

It's Time White Republicans Stopped Lying to Each Other​

Uh, Republicans weren’t in charge in the south during Jim Crow. That was all Democrats.

Blacks started voting with the KKK back in the 1930’s, all for the promise of welfare, which they didn’t even get because of....Democrat Jim Crow laws.

And oh boy, did things start changing for black communities when they started voting Democrat. Their divorce rates went up, then single mother rates skyrocketed, which in turn led to their kids being undisciplined, which led them to having the highest crime rates and incarceration rates.

So, keep voting Dem for another hundred years. I’m sure someday the fortunes of the blacks will turn around.
Jim crow was in the nort and the south.
Hardly conclusive, since Democrats controlled the North almost as much as the south in the 1930’s and in fact throughout most of the 1900’s.

Do you even realize Democrats completely owned both the House and the Senate from 1933 up until the 1980’s with the exception of two terms? It was complete and total Democratic domination throughout the entire Jim Crow era.

But let’s hear the excuses, how it was always the Republicans and never the Democrats pushing and upholding Jim Crow laws.
 
OP
IM2

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
47,488
Reaction score
12,419
Points
2,220
“Times have changed and the worst enemy that the Negro has today is this white man that runs around here drooling at the mouth professing to love Negros and claims to be calling out liberals. Following these white conservatives will continue perpetuating problems that Negros have. The Negro cannot be taken, tricked or deceived by the white conservatives, and must continue to get together and solve our own problems. I only cite these things to show you that in 21st Century America, the history of the white conservative has been nothing but a series of trickery designed to make Negros think that the white liberal is the one with the problem. Our problems will never be solved by the white man, liberal or conservative.” -- Malcolm X, 2021
You have to make up crap to make a point? How is that superior to those who misappropriate MLK?
Go talk to a thousand black people then come tell me this is made up.
 

Rocko

Platinum Member
Joined
Aug 30, 2011
Messages
19,410
Reaction score
6,151
Points
350
Location
NY
I tried to think of a better title, but this fits the description. People here read this trifling mess and believe it as if it's the gospel. So lets look at this article.

Truth: Democrats Feed Racism to Control Our Black Community
BY VINCE EVERETT ELLISON JUN 12, 2020

First off the title is a lie. If democrats were actually doing that rest assured that 99 percent of the blacks in America would be republican. Now as I am black, I think I have a fair understanding of how blacks would do things if this was the circumstance.

For the past few months, we have witnessed the raw and unmasked Democrat Party, live and in living color. Their constituents are rioting, looting, and murdering because they have finally realized that there are only three areas where the government is supremely prolific and highly efficient: theft, incarceration, and killing.

The evidence produced from documentation show this comment to be inaccuate.

The Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project documented the summer protests. The project recorded over 7,500 protests and found that more than 93 percent were peaceful. They cited over 2,400 locations and found that violence occurred in less than 220. The violence ranged from “fighting back against police” to vandalism, property destruction looting, road-blocking using barricades, burning tires or other materials.”This report also found that the over the top government response from president number 45 contributed to the violence. The federal response basically increased tension and violence. For example, in Portland the violence increased by 9 percent after President number 45 sent troops to that city. What ACLED found was that government intervened 3 times more in BLM demonstrations than any other.

“ ACLED also highlights a violent government response, in which authorities use force more often than not when they are present at protests and that they disproportionately used force while intervening in demonstrations associated with the BLM movement, relative to other types of demonstrations.”


Sanya Mansour, 93% of Black Lives Matter Protests Have Been Peaceful, New Report Finds

A funny thing was discovered during these protests,(well actually not so funny). The violence in many of these protests were from people who were more than likely not associated with Black Lives Matter. Seems that most of the violence came from infiltrators and counter protesters, many who were associated with white nationalist and paramilitary organization. These groups had an ally that often times helped to escalate the situation, then used violence to settle things down. That ally was law enforcement.

“Since Floyd’s killing, dozens of car-ramming attacks by individual perpetrators — in some cases acting independently with no reported affiliation, and in others linked to hate groups like the Ku Klux Klan — have been reported at demonstrations around the country. Other cases have involved those affiliated with the government, such as the military and law enforcement, including an on-duty police officer at a demonstration in Anaheim, California on 25 July; an off-duty police officer at a demonstration in Seattle, Washington on 4 July; an army sergeant at a demonstration in Austin, Texas on 25 July; and an off-duty jail correctional officer at a demonstration in Kokomo, Indiana on 30 May.”

Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project- Demonstrations & Political Violence In America: Summer 2020

In similar fashion the Radcliffe Institute at Harvard found that that 96.3% of the BLM protests had no property damage or police injuries, and in 97.7% of events, no injuries were reported at all.

But since this doesn't agree with the narrative, it's pawned off as liberal psuedo itellectualism or liberal bias.

Outside this “Iron Triangle” government fails horribly at education, protection, health care, economic development, border security, drug enforcement and infrastructure. Yet after months of economic collapse, pandemic hysteria and racial anarchy, where 60 years of Democrat Party abuse of Black America was revealed, black leadership still chooses the government as its vehicle to solve these indignities. Why? Because this is what the Democrats desire.

Another lie. Let us look at how things were for blacks 60 years ago. At this time 60 years ago, we still has jim crow. Jim crow was ended by the signature of a democratic president and a majority democratic vote. Republicans had from 1897 to end jim crow and did not. 60 years ago more than half the black population lived below poverty thanks to jim crow that both parties were complicit in maintaning. But let me skip a few years so we get to the crux of this lie.. From 1994-2007 republicans controlled the house. From 2000-2007 they controlled Washington and upwards of 30 states. From 2010-2018 republicans controlled both houses. From 2017-2019 they controlled Washington and I believe between 33-37 states. So when we read a righht winger talk about democratic abuse of blacks, the facts show this to be a lie.

Blacks turn to the federal government because if we depended on states we'd still be slaves. There has been no democratic abuse of black America and furthermore on the local level, republicans have every chance to win mayoral races so if they lose, perhaps it's the policies. And there really are no democratic or republican cities, a mayor does nothing major without the city council and most city councils are bi partisan.

Except for a brief time during Reconstruction, there has never been a time since its inception in 1800 that the Democrats have not had absolute control over most of the black population in America. They have used race in one way or another to maintain power ever since.

The fact that one-hundred fifty years since the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments were ratified and fifty-six years since the 1964 Civil Rights Act, blacks are still rioting over racism and still begging government to eradicate it, should tell us something: The Democrat Party uses racism to subdue and control black Americans, not eradicate racism to institute justice. Ending racism would end the Democrats’ stranglehold on Black America.

The problem with this lie is that free blacks during slavery were republicans. For example, Frederick Douglass. The fact this "article" misses is the many different ways both republicans and democrats subverted the laws that have been produced. This writer is delusional and this story is nothing but a 100 percent fact free racist rant. Republicans aren't interested in ending racism, they exist just like democrats and they have the same political stregnth and do nothing but bitch about what democrats aren't doing for blacks.

This narrative plays well to a base of white aversive racists, but we black folk want to see policy. Refusing to end qualified immunity for police is not a policy that is going to get blacks to join the republican party. And the republican record on economic development is abysmal. The reason why we are still fighting to end racism is because there are whites who won't stop being racis and that's, republican, democrat, libertarian, green, whatever.

The proof of this charge is evidenced in a June 4, 2020, Washington Post story, in which a devastating critique highlights the Democrat Party’s dismal failure, in its fake effort, to narrow the wealth gap between black and white Americans. Heather Long and Andrew Van Dam write, “In many ways, the gap between the finances of black and whites is still as wide as it was in 1968.” The story illustrates the fact that in 1968 the average black household had $6,674 in wealth compared to $70,786 for a white household. In 2016 the typical black household had $13,024 in wealth vs $149,703 for a white household.

Instead of accepting the reality that whites have not stopped the racism and in fact practices a more covert form, this intellectually lazy individual blames democrats. His lie misses the fact that since 1968, we have had 6 republican presidents and 4 democrats. What have republicans done? They increased the wealth gap using that trickle down nonsense. You know, that great republican plan for prosperity whereby we cut taxes for the very rich and they would create jobs.

In 1968 this was the case:

“What white Americans have never fully understood but what the Negro can never forget--is that white society is deeply implicated in the ghetto. White institutions created it, white institutions maintain it, and white society condones it. It is time now to turn with all the purpose at our command to the major unfinished business of this nation. It is time to adopt strategies for action that will produce quick and visible progress. It is time to make good the promises of American democracy to all citizens-urban and rural, white and black, Spanish-surname, American Indian, and every minority group.”

50 years later the Economic Policy Institute determined that things rremained basically the same. This was not because democrats were using race to keep black voters. That's just a stupid assertion, anyone who believes this is crazy and their opinions on matters of race cannot be taken seriously.

But to say this guy is racist, gets the crazy, but:

According to the Brookings Institution if people do these three things, they have a 98 percent chance to stay out of poverty: Get a high school diploma, work full time, and wait until age 21 and get married before having a baby. The Democrats know this. So they have intentionally destroyed the educational system in the inner cities, introduced sex to our children at an early age, and set up and maintained a welfare state that continues to destroy the traditional family.

Democrats have forbidden the black community even the foundational elements of survival by violating their inalienable right to self-defense and religious expression. They have told them they are victims, oppressed and discriminated against.


Now this is pure racist bs. Blacks do all these things and whites have babies unmarried before 21. But staying out of poverty involves being paid wages that are above poverty. When black men make 80 cents on the dollar earned by white men even with the same academic attainment and doing the same work and black women 63 cents in the same set of circumstances, the comments above show the person saying it is clueless. Democrats didn't destroy anything and democrats have not forbidden anything for black people. White racism is bi partisan and that is the problem. Democrats aren't telling us this, we live the experience and see it for ourselves.

Considering the extraordinary amount of crime in the inner-city communities along with the constant complaints of police brutality, this is an interesting phenomenon. Nevertheless, Democrat politicians continually vote to disarm the “hunted” citizens and the black Democrats vote to be disarmed.

Whites are arrested every year for 70 percent of the crime in America. Annually they lead in 90 percent of the crime categories used by the FBI in the Uniform Crime Reports. If anybody is told something it is whites who are republican. Blacks vote against guns because we see the killing and know that if we reduce access to deadly weapons, we reducing the shootings. The insane notion of good guys with guns is ludicrous, yet republicans tell white this is the way to go.

To secure 90% of the black vote for the Democrat Party, the black community is not being served, it is being occupied. This occupation is necessary for the cultural genocide that is taking place there. And like a patient, after spending all of their money and discovering that their physician is a quack and a con-man, blacks are asking hard questions. And some are rioting.

The Democrats said, “If you give us your children we will educate them”; they lied.

They said, “If you get rid of your men, we will provide for you”; they lied.

They said, “If you give us your guns we will protect you”; they lied.


Blacks who rioted, did so because for the last 100 years police have been allowed to murder blacks and lie. For 100 years blacks were republicans. Racists like this who feed the white community this bs do not mention this fact. Democrats cannot occupy people who CHOOSE to vote. There are no democrats in voting places telling blacks to vote democrat before they enter a voting booth. This guy and others associated with this site and others like it are feeding crazy to whites and working to increase racial division.

Again, republican politicians run for office, but you are not going to get black votes when you are a politician telling blacks they can't think for themselves but must be told that racism exists so they can believe they are victims.

Republicans have been for more stringent policing of non white communities as well as enacting laws allowing whites to kill people of color claiming to be standing their ground. Republicans offer nothing, vouchers don't solve funding formula issues based on property tax values. The refusal to pay a national living wage ensures the continuance of poverty. Instead of looking at these things, people on the right like this guy, want to play identty politics and to white racial resentment.

Racism in America is no longer a government problem. There is no governmental statute in America that condones racism. Today, there are thousands of laws against racism, yet it still exists. Government cannot stop racism.

And here is the excuse racists use in order to absolve themselves of personal responsibility. There is a reason racism still exists, there are whites who refuse to stop being racists. Let me end with this comment:

“There is very little truth in the old refrain that one cannot legislate equality. Laws not only provide concrete benefits, they can even change the hearts of men—some men, anyhow—for good or evil.”

Thurgood Marshall
Not one person read that shit bre
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$515.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top