It’s Time for an Outright Ban on the Promotion of Atheism.

No it's not hypocritical. Right now gov't control is a bad thing because it's atheist. A Christian government preventing the spread of atheism would be a good thing, Perfectly consistent.

Only if you are a Christian. And, apparently, only if you are a certain type of Christian.
 
Not yet it hasn't. You have been saying Roe v. Wade has been overturned for a couple of months now. It has not happened yet.

Then why all the handwringing and protests from you leftwingers?
 
Because it's an easy way to hide dirty money used to bribe elected officials ?
Donating to elected officials isn't classified as charitable giving. So again, why do conservatives donate more to charities than leftwingers, if leftwingers are supposedly the ones more generous like Christ, as was Asher's claim?
 
Donating to elected officials isn't classified as charitable giving. So again, why do conservatives donate more to charities than leftwingers, if leftwingers are supposedly the ones more generous like Christ, as was Asher's claim?
The claim was that by his actions, Jesus was a Socialist. He helped for free and was against the businesses around the Temple.
 
The claim was that by his actions, Jesus was a Socialist. He helped for free and was against the businesses around the Temple.
Conservatives would be outraged at the use of a church for business reasons, not socialists.
And we just demonstrated conservatives are personally more generous with their own resources than socialist to the poor.....so, you're wrong on every count.

Bottom line. Jesus was not a socialist. Jesus was the opposite of a socialist. He was a conservative.
 
Then why all the handwringing and protests from you leftwingers?

Because the original ruling is threatened. According to the leaked papers, Roe v. Wade may be overturned in the near future. But you are incorrect in stating that is HAS BEEN overturned. You are wrong now and have been wrong for the month or so you have been saying it.
 
Which, as has been stated numerous times, is blatantly unconstitutional.
Why do you repeat the same thing over and over? I already said my proposal would require a constitutional amendment.
 
Because the original ruling is threatened. According to the leaked papers, Roe v. Wade may be overturned in the near future. But you are incorrect in stating that is HAS BEEN overturned. You are wrong now and have been wrong for the month or so you have been saying it.
So glad it's been overturned. Why do you have it in for all those little babies?
 
Why do you repeat the same thing over and over? I already said my proposal would require a constitutional amendment.

So get your amendment passed. I am pretty sure you will not have the votes.

Then you can "come for" same sex marriage.
 
So get your amendment passed. I am pretty sure you will not have the votes.

Then you can "come for" same sex marriage.
Same sex marriage will fall. Mark it down.
 
15th post
I have not told a single lie. You, however, have insisted numerous times that Roe v. Wade has been overturned. It has not.
It has. Listen, Mashie has to go. I've won all the debates this morning anyway, so....
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom