It's still getting hotter

I see the latest research has blown your conspiracy theory right out of the water .

Stop peddling your crazy ideas , Crack Crock .

Understand experts and specialists and stop cherry picking . nonsense .
en.wikipedia.org

Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org
Opposing (The AGW Consensus)

Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.".."[28][30]..

`
 
The earth is getting so warm, her indoors put the heating on yesterday, a good month or two sooner than usual.
 
Last edited:
  • Thanks
Reactions: EMH
en.wikipedia.org

Scientific consensus on climate change - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org
Opposing (The AGW Consensus)

Since 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[29] NO national or international scientific body any longer rejects the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.".."[28][30]..

`




That chart is

1. deliberately cherry picked urban heat island effect readings
2. fudge


and your sorry excuse of a "science person" cannot answer five basic climate questions...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?
 
Apparently it is "funny" that abu cannot answer five basic climate questions while showering USMB daily with FUDGE charts...
 
$76 trillion!!!
SO.....
the "$76 Trillion" TrollsterParrot posts daily has NO Current basis.
It's a 14 Year Old estimate!

(2011)

New Pricetag for Going Green: $76 Trillion | National Review

So says the noted climate-denial body located on New York City’s East River. Dan Gainor: Two years ago, U.N. researchers were claiming that it would cost “as much as $600 billion a year over the ne…[/quote

Solar (and on-shore wind) has come Down in price 90%.
See my other OPs on renewables.
-
`
 
SO.....
the "$76 Trillion" TrollsterParrot posts daily has NO Current basis.
It's a 14 Year Old estimate!



Solar (and on-shore wind) has come Down in price 90%.
See my other OPs on renewables.
-
`
Getting back to the OP, it's getting hotter because it always gets hotter after a glacial period has ended.
glacial cycles.gif


The northern hemisphere is deglaciating because of heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic.

ArcticCurrentsMap4.webp


which causes the entire planet (oceans and the atmosphere) to warm.
ocean temperature.webp
 
SO.....
the "$76 Trillion" TrollsterParrot posts daily has NO Current basis.
It's a 14 Year Old estimate!



Solar (and on-shore wind) has come Down in price 90%.
See my other OPs on renewables.
-
`

Yeah, show me the current UN estimate to stop AGW.
Let me know how much lower it is now.
 


whoopsie indeed....deceptive dumbass




 
whoopsie indeed....deceptive dumbass





lol... ancient news :hello77:

dOy

Whooopsie

Antarctica’s Astonishing Rebound: Ice Sheet Grows for the First Time in Decades
 
whoopsie indeed....deceptive dumbass

Prove why all these sources are all WRONG and yours are all right.
 
I take it that when asked for proof or explanation and all you offer is a funny, that means as usual that you ain't got shit really to say.
Nope..it means I looked at the sources of your links..and was amused.
Amused also by your taking what is, basically, an anomaly, and applying it to a long-term trend in a vain attempt to discredit the trend~
 
Last edited:
Nope..it means I looked at the sources of your links..and was amused.
Amused also by your taking what is, basically, an anomaly, and applying it to a long-term trend in a vain attempt to discredit the trend~

You were amused. Gee, that stands for a whole lot! :lmao:
Anomaly--- now you are a climatological expert seeing into the future too. :uhh:
No wonder you have zero credibility.
 
Nope..it means I looked at the sources of your links..and was amused.
Amused also by your taking what is, basically, an anomaly, and applying it to a long-term trend in a vain attempt to discredit the trend~

So you have nothing, gee thanks for clearing that up!

Meanwhile the link you didn't bother to read

Spatiotemporal mass change rate analysis from 2002 to 2023 over the Antarctic Ice Sheet and four glacier basins in Wilkes-Queen Mary Land​


LINK
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom