It's still getting hotter

actually, I've been waiting for a climate scientist who agrees with you. I gave you at least five by now. Willie Soon was the first. friends of Science the second set.
You're missing the point - or you're dodging something you don't want to answer. If global warming is a fraud or a hoax or a scam, SOMEWHERE there is a climate scientist that knows about the hoax, the fraud, the scam - and is willing to talk about it. But no one seems to have found him yet. And it's been decades, hasn't it. And there are thousands of climate scientists. I'm just having a hard time understanding why you guys haven't found him yet.
Here's a new one

It might have seemed like a fringe event, except for one speaker’s credentials. John F. Clauser shared the Nobel Prize in physics last year before declaring Tuesday that “there is no climate crisis” — a claim that contradicts the overwhelming scientific consensus.
As far as global warming goes, John Clauser IS a fringe speaker. He has zero qualifications in the topic, has never written, submitted or published a single piece of work with the slightest connection to climate science and is old enough that his cognitive abilities are in serious doubt. Your side's abuse of the man is despicable. But even Clauser never said it was a hoax, or a fraud or a scam and, in the end, backtracked from almost everything he'd originally said.
 
If global warming is a fraud or a hoax or a scam, SOMEWHERE there is a climate scientist that knows about the hoax, the fraud, the scam - and is willing to talk about it. But no one seems to have found him yet.
Frauds get away with it until they don't.
 
You're missing the point - or you're dodging something you don't want to answer. If global warming is a fraud or a hoax or a scam, SOMEWHERE there is a climate scientist that knows about the hoax, the fraud, the scam - and is willing to talk about it. But no one seems to have found him yet. And it's been decades, hasn't it. And there are thousands of climate scientists. I'm just having a hard time understanding why you guys haven't found him yet.

As far as global warming goes, John Clauser IS a fringe speaker. He has zero qualifications in the topic, has never written, submitted or published a single piece of work with the slightest connection to climate science and is old enough that his cognitive abilities are in serious doubt. Your side's abuse of the man is despicable. But even Clauser never said it was a hoax, or a fraud or a scam and, in the end, backtracked from almost everything he'd originally said.


So the NOBEL PRIZE WINNER IN PHYSICS is not a "scientist" or a "climate scientist" because THERE CLEARLY IS A DIFFERENCE....
 
Have you sought psychiatric help yet?


This is funny. You have claimed over and over "the scientists" blah blah blah... and now it is just "the climate scientists" and those are two completely different animals. A scientist practices actual science. A climate scientist takes raw data showing NO WARMING and FUDGES IT to claim "warming" that never existed.
 
We seem to still be waiting for a climate scientist who agrees with the lot of you that global warming is a hoax.
Which area of science did the scientist qualify in to be called a climate scientist?
 
If global warming is a fraud or a hoax or a scam, SOMEWHERE there is a climate scientist that knows about the hoax, the fraud, the scam - and is willing to talk about it


LOL!!!

If Al Capone was really dealing illegal booze in Chicago, then surely someone in his gang would come forward and tell the press about it...
 
You're missing the point - or you're dodging something you don't want to answer. If global warming is a fraud or a hoax or a scam, SOMEWHERE there is a climate scientist that knows about the hoax, the fraud, the scam - and is willing to talk about it. But no one seems to have found him yet. And it's been decades, hasn't it. And there are thousands of climate scientists. I'm just having a hard time understanding why you guys haven't found him yet.

As far as global warming goes, John Clauser IS a fringe speaker. He has zero qualifications in the topic, has never written, submitted or published a single piece of work with the slightest connection to climate science and is old enough that his cognitive abilities are in serious doubt. Your side's abuse of the man is despicable. But even Clauser never said it was a hoax, or a fraud or a scam and, in the end, backtracked from almost everything he'd originally said.
JC, have you found a climate scientist who says that global warming is a hoax or a fraud yet?
 
JC, have you found a climate scientist who says that global warming is a hoax or a fraud yet?
Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, Ronan Connolly, Willie Soon, Michael Connolly, Sallie Baliunas, Johan Berglund, John Butler, Rodolfo Gustavo Cionco, Ana G. Elias, Valery M. Fedorov, Hermann Harde, Gregory W. Henry, Douglas V. Hoyt, Ole Humlum, David R. Legates, Sebastian Luning, Nicola Scafetta, Jan-Erik Solheim, Laszl ´ o Szarka, Harry van Loon, Vıctor M. Velasco, Richard C. Willson, Hong Yan and Weijia Zhang?
 
Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, Ronan Connolly, Willie Soon, Michael Connolly, Sallie Baliunas, Johan Berglund, John Butler, Rodolfo Gustavo Cionco, Ana G. Elias, Valery M. Fedorov, Hermann Harde, Gregory W. Henry, Douglas V. Hoyt, Ole Humlum, David R. Legates, Sebastian Luning, Nicola Scafetta, Jan-Erik Solheim, Laszl ´ o Szarka, Harry van Loon, Vıctor M. Velasco, Richard C. Willson, Hong Yan and Weijia Zhang?

Chris Landsea only says "it's too soon to tell" ... but he's the hurricane expert ... fewer and less intense tropical cyclones in our warmer future ... due to Arctic Amplification and 2LoT ...

A slight amount of CO2 causes a slight amount of warming ... what's in dispute is catastrophe ... hypercanes and hockey sticks ... no more than Asteroid Attacks all over again ... or the Martians are landing HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

Fools gotta to be foolish ...
 
Chris Landsea only says "it's too soon to tell" ... but he's the hurricane expert ... fewer and less intense tropical cyclones in our warmer future ... due to Arctic Amplification and 2LoT ...

A slight amount of CO2 causes a slight amount of warming ... what's in dispute is catastrophe ... hypercanes and hockey sticks ... no more than Asteroid Attacks all over again ... or the Martians are landing HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW HAW ...

Fools gotta to be foolish ...
Are you suggesting that all the warming observed since the start of the IR is "a slight amount of warming" or that other causes, in addition to "a slight amount of warming" from the greenhouse effect acting on CO2, are its cause?

If the latter, what do you believe to be those other causes?
 
Are you suggesting that all the warming observed since the start of the IR is "a slight amount of warming" or that other causes, in addition to "a slight amount of warming" from the greenhouse effect acting on CO2, are its cause?

If the latter, what do you believe to be those other causes?
Their modelling of feedback is flawed. The most the warming attributed to CO2 can be is 0.22C to 0.5C. So yes, a slight amount of CO2 has caused a slight amount of warming. The rest is due to the planet naturally warming up - like it has every interglacial period for the past 3 million years - due to the northern hemisphere deglaciating.
 
As many as we need.
I used to hope Democrats would build the needed Nuclear reactors but they decided as a party to stand against nuclear power plants.
 
Are you suggesting that all the warming observed since the start of the IR is "a slight amount of warming" or that other causes, in addition to "a slight amount of warming" from the greenhouse effect acting on CO2, are its cause?
I would be happy to blame anything. But the science prohibits that. I can't blame humans for several reasons. First during months of high heat, we have places known for record heats in the past, such as at Death Valley, CA happening in the year 1913. And since then no days have come to the record created in 1913. That is 111 years ago. If we suffer from Carbon Dioxide caused heat, we should now have records that shoot higher than the 1913 record of 134 degrees.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: EMH
Judith Curry, Roy Spencer, Ronan Connolly, Willie Soon, Michael Connolly, Sallie Baliunas, Johan Berglund, John Butler, Rodolfo Gustavo Cionco, Ana G. Elias, Valery M. Fedorov, Hermann Harde, Gregory W. Henry, Douglas V. Hoyt, Ole Humlum, David R. Legates, Sebastian Luning, Nicola Scafetta, Jan-Erik Solheim, Laszl ´ o Szarka, Harry van Loon, Vıctor M. Velasco, Richard C. Willson, Hong Yan and Weijia Zhang?
These scientists could make millions of dollars if they only blamed man for warming. But notice how many refuse to blame man. And to those blaming man, why don't you understand if you blame man, you can do it and explain why temperatures of records keep being followed days later in many cases of much lower temperatures at the same places that earlier were hot?
 
I would be happy to blame anything. But the science prohibits that. I can't blame humans for several reasons. First during months of high heat, we have places known for record heats in the past, such as at Death Valley, CA happening in the year 1913. And since then no days have come to the record created in 1913. That is 111 years ago. If we suffer from Carbon Dioxide caused heat, we should now have records that shoot higher than the 1913 record of 134 degrees.


Indeed, a "climate change" would do just that, alter the parameters of temperature on Earth, and hence we should have ZERO record lows and record highs all the time, and we are not seeing that at all. The regular occurrence of record low temps is proof the climate has not "warmed."
 
warming observed since the start of the IR


The only actual warming in the data is from Urban Heat, growing urban areas on the surface. Everything else

atmosphere
oceans
hurricanes
ocean level
ice

shows NO WARMING.
 
Climate solutions
Article Nov. 15, 2023 - ExxonMobil,com

Reframing the Climate Challenge | ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil Chairman and CEO, Darren Woods, talks about reframing the climate challenge during the APEC CEO Summit
corporate.exxonmobil.com

corporate.exxonmobil.com

ExxonMobil Chairman and CEO, Darren Woods, talks about reframing the climate challenge during the APEC CEO Summit​


So, allow me to share this with you – here’s what ExxonMobil knows:

    • Climate change is real,
    • Human activity plays a Major role,
    • And, it is one of the Major problems facing the World today – the Need to address the very Real Threat of Climate Change.
........

``
 
Climate solutions
Article Nov. 15, 2023 - ExxonMobil,com

Reframing the Climate Challenge | ExxonMobil

ExxonMobil Chairman and CEO, Darren Woods, talks about reframing the climate challenge during the APEC CEO Summit
corporate.exxonmobil.com

corporate.exxonmobil.com

ExxonMobil Chairman and CEO, Darren Woods, talks about reframing the climate challenge during the APEC CEO Summit​


So, allow me to share this with you – here’s what ExxonMobil knows:

    • Climate change is real,
    • Human activity plays a Major role,
    • And, it is one of the Major problems facing the World today – the Need to address the very Real Threat of Climate Change.
........

``

How many new nuclear power plants does Darren think we should build?
 
Folks believe it ISN"T actually taking place. I'd like to talk to such folks. I'd really like to hear why they believe such things. I'd really like to hear a conceivable chain of events that could have produced the current temperature data record out of thin air. If anyone would like to give it a serious go, I can promise to do my very best on this occasion to withhold my usual bitter vituperation. Whether that's good enough, only time will tell.

I see the latest research has blown your conspiracy theory right out of the water .

Stop peddling your crazy ideas , Crack Crock .

Understand experts and specialists and stop cherry picking . nonsense .
 
Back
Top Bottom