PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
- Thread starter
- #21
So let's premise upon your shaming of the court, shall we? Let's.I was just happy proving how wrong your source was concerning the lie from Matt Paxton (supposedly a court clerk), which in your source, he's only referred to as "Paxton", making people think that it was the Texas attorney general.Why are you so concerned as to whether Roberts yelled it or not.....when he clearly believed in dodging hearing the cases?
Supposedly, according to your reicht-wing piece, Roberts was yelling that they couldn't hear the case because there were riots going on. You called him cowardly.
We now know that none of that happened. It was all a big lie.
"We now know that none of that happened. It was all a big lie."
Really???
The court did its job????
It heard the cases?????
No, it didn't.
Whether Roberts and the other cowards yelled......or simply acted as they did.......
.....it is the shame of the court.
Of course, folks like you don't understand shame:
You explained who and what you are.....here:
"Principles are like morals; completely unnecessary."
The Benefits Of Having No Principles
You never have think.....you simply nod. 1.There really is no basis for every having a meeting of the mind with folks who have no principles…..and no minds. That would describe the Democrats. Principle: a fundamental truth or proposition that serves as the foundation for a system of belief or...www.usmessageboard.com
The court is not ashamed, and neither am I.
One of the things that you supposed, was that the SCOTUS Judges were afraid to overturn the vote, for fear of being attacked by the left-wing army.
They didn't get there by being dumb.
"The court is not ashamed, and neither am I."
Of course you're not......you wrote this:
"Principles are like morals; completely unnecessary."
And Democrats follow your dictum, and lie all the time.