Catsnmeters
Gold Member
- Sep 19, 2022
- 16,992
- 6,501
- 208
Another creepy Segway into sexual preferences by the right in an unrelated topic.Technically they were transurrections.
Can't help it can yah?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Another creepy Segway into sexual preferences by the right in an unrelated topic.Technically they were transurrections.
Aren't you late for the daily two minutes of hate?Montana and Tennessee were not insurrections. January 6th was.
End of thread.
False equivalence. Who was convicted of sedition in 2016?
Expected logic by the right though to dishonestly dismiss their traitorous actions.
Now-a-days, if a lefty stubs their tow on a government building trumpers cry INSURRECTION!
Which ones were convicted of an insurection?Your criteria for a 'false equivalence' is laughable at best, tell me what the point of attempting to attack the Whitehouse and burning down the church next to it was? They weren't 'traitors' to you, you were cheering them on, weren't you?
It's not the topic. You are just one of those who seems to think and subsequently post about it a lot...even in unrelated threads.It's 100% on topic, but I do agree with you that trans are creepy.
Which ones were convicted of an insurection?
You can't even spell it, let alone define it.. lol No one was convicted of an 'insurrection' in 2020.![]()
They did screw it up. Thankfully Congress bravely reconvened and completed their constitutional duty of counting the electorial votes, the false elector people were not successful and pence did not get in that car.Two people that I know of were convicted of seditious conspiracy, too bad they didn't tell the other thousands there that day or the ones who were in the capitol building taking selfies. They totally screwed up their job of 'overthrowing the government'.![]()
I think insurrection is a misnomer and I wish the left would stop using it.
Although the crimes are very similar, it's more accurate to call it sedition based on the convictions.
I know. That is why I posted I prefer to call it sedition and not insurrection. For sake of arguement though it doesn't really matter as they are very similar crimes.
They did screw it up. Thankfully Congress bravely reconvened and completed their constitutional duty of counting the electorial votes, the false elector people were not successful and pence did not get in that car.
You missed two traitors who were convicted for sedition.
How many in the left were convicted of sedition in your false equivalence scenarios?
![]()
Four Oath Keepers guilty of seditious conspiracy in U.S. Capitol attack
Four more members of the far-right Oath Keepers were found guilty on Monday of seditious conspiracy for taking part in the Jan. 6, 2021 assault on the U.S. Capitol by supporters of Donald Trump, in another big win for federal prosecutors.www.reuters.com
Nobody was overthrowing shit, fucking hysterical liar.You can call murder something else but it's still murder. You can call rape something else but it's still rape. And Jan6 was an attempt at overthrowing the legal elected government. That's insurrection.
Yeah. Same arguement trumpers used in the months following Jan 6. It wasn't insurrection because nobody was charged with insurrection. Remember?Let me be sure I understand your 'argument' here. So your whole argument to defend 'the left' and those who terrorized DC and the Whitehouse in 2016, where the president had to be evacuated, is that they weren't convicted of seditious conspiracy? So therefore, it was just child's play, and they weren't traitors because of that? Therefore, their actions were much more acceptable than the actions of those in 2016? Is that your argument?
You can call murder something else but it's still murder. You can call rape something else but it's still rape. And Jan6 was an attempt at overthrowing the legal elected government. That's insurrection.
Yeah. Same arguement trumpers used in the months following Jan 6. It wasn't insurrection because nobody was charged with insurrection. Remember?
I am just using the arguement trumpers used...until it wasn't convenient anyhow.
No, it simply wasn't seditious like Jan 6 was.I see you recuse yourself from any comment on the actions of those in 2016, we'll just put our head in the sand and pretend none of that happened. So, to reiterate, the actions of those in 2016 were acceptable and reasonable since they weren't seditious?
Your title.....very Freudian of you."1984" was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual....Make Orwell fiction again!
In an interesting turn of events, the Associated Press no longer appears to believe that staging a riot at a capitol building with the intention of disrupting and diverting legislative proceedings is an insurrection.
Janaury 14, 2021 saw the AP publicly hashing out what to call the Capitol riot of January 6. In an article entitled "Riot? Insurrection? Words matter in describing Capitol siege," the AP ran through a list of potential words to describe the events in Washington, DC on that day.
Apparently words still matter—but only when convenient to the left.
<snip>
The AP states that despite the arrests, those little protests in Montana and Tennessee "didn’t involve violence or any real attempts to dismantle or replace a government," and quote the Harvard professor again to say that "it's wrong to call them insurrections."
Another "keen" legal mind, UNC law prof Michael Gerhardy, told the AP that "Disrupting things is a far cry from insurrection. It’s just a protest, and protesters are not insurrectionists."
In 2021, however, the AP sang a very different tune, saying that the term protest for January 6 was too mild. At that time, they quoted a CBS News exec who said that January 6 "was a lot more sinister than it first appeared," by way of explaining that this is why–at first–terms like protest and protesters were used, though they changed, at the AP's urging, to be more incendiary.
![]()
LIBBY EMMONS: Associated Press—who used capitol riot to redefine ‘insurrection’—now OUTRAGED by GOP calling state capitol riots ‘insurrections’
“Words still matter”—but only when convenient to the left.humanevents.com
View attachment 781251
Nobody was overthrowing shit, fucking hysterical liar.
No, it simply wasn't seditious like Jan 6 was.
Anyone arrested, charged and convicted deserves what they got. I won't blame Ray Epps, the FBI, or secret green men as cover for their criminal actions.
What exactly is your arguement?