It's not an "INSURRECTION!" when we do it

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Jan 3, 2009
102,841
106,048
3,615
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
"1984" was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual....Make Orwell fiction again!


In an interesting turn of events, the Associated Press no longer appears to believe that staging a riot at a capitol building with the intention of disrupting and diverting legislative proceedings is an insurrection.

Janaury 14, 2021 saw the AP publicly hashing out what to call the Capitol riot of January 6. In an article entitled "Riot? Insurrection? Words matter in describing Capitol siege," the AP ran through a list of potential words to describe the events in Washington, DC on that day.

Apparently words still matter—but only when convenient to the left.


<snip>

The AP states that despite the arrests, those little protests in Montana and Tennessee "didn’t involve violence or any real attempts to dismantle or replace a government," and quote the Harvard professor again to say that "it's wrong to call them insurrections."

Another "keen" legal mind, UNC law prof Michael Gerhardy, told the AP that "Disrupting things is a far cry from insurrection. It’s just a protest, and protesters are not insurrectionists."


In 2021, however, the AP sang a very different tune, saying that the term protest for January 6 was too mild. At that time, they quoted a CBS News exec who said that January 6 "was a lot more sinister than it first appeared," by way of explaining that this is why–at first–terms like protest and protesters were used, though they changed, at the AP's urging, to be more incendiary.



OrewllLulz.jpg
 
Last edited:
"1984" was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual....Make Orwell fiction again!


In an interesting turn of events, the Associated Press no longer appears to believe that staging a riot at a capitol building with the intention of disrupting and diverting legislative proceedings is an insurrection.

Janaury 14, 2021 saw the AP publicly hashing out what to call the Capitol riot of January 6. In an article entitled "Riot? Insurrection? Words matter in describing Capitol siege," the AP ran through a list of potential words to describe the events in Washington, DC on that day.

Apparently words still matter—but only when convenient to the left.


<snip>

The AP states that despite the arrests, those little protests in Montana and Tennessee "didn’t involve violence or any real attempts to dismantle or replace a government," and quote the Harvard professor again to say that "it's wrong to call them insurrections."

Another "keen" legal mind, UNC law prof Michael Gerhardy, told the AP that "Disrupting things is a far cry from insurrection. It’s just a protest, and protesters are not insurrectionists."


In 2021, however, the AP sang a very different tune, saying that the term protest for January 6 was too mild. At that time, they quoted a CBS News exec who said that January 6 "was a lot more sinister than it first appeared," by way of explaining that this is why–at first–terms like protest and protesters were used, though they changed, at the AP's urging, to be more incendiary.



View attachment 781251
I think insurrection is a misnomer and I wish the left would stop using it.

Although the crimes are very similar, it's more accurate to call it sedition based on the convictions.
 
"1984" was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual....Make Orwell fiction again!


In an interesting turn of events, the Associated Press no longer appears to believe that staging a riot at a capitol building with the intention of disrupting and diverting legislative proceedings is an insurrection.

Janaury 14, 2021 saw the AP publicly hashing out what to call the Capitol riot of January 6. In an article entitled "Riot? Insurrection? Words matter in describing Capitol siege," the AP ran through a list of potential words to describe the events in Washington, DC on that day.

Apparently words still matter—but only when convenient to the left.


<snip>

The AP states that despite the arrests, those little protests in Montana and Tennessee "didn’t involve violence or any real attempts to dismantle or replace a government," and quote the Harvard professor again to say that "it's wrong to call them insurrections."

Another "keen" legal mind, UNC law prof Michael Gerhardy, told the AP that "Disrupting things is a far cry from insurrection. It’s just a protest, and protesters are not insurrectionists."


In 2021, however, the AP sang a very different tune, saying that the term protest for January 6 was too mild. At that time, they quoted a CBS News exec who said that January 6 "was a lot more sinister than it first appeared," by way of explaining that this is why–at first–terms like protest and protesters were used, though they changed, at the AP's urging, to be more incendiary.



View attachment 781251
Montana and Tennessee were not insurrections. January 6th was.
End of thread.
 
But whatever we call it, it was not a normal tourist day.
No, certainly not. It was a clusterfuck of Trump Traitors, some armed, some with a plan, shitting all over the capital, breaking windows, attacking police, threatening to hang pence, shitheads which ultimately played out as sedition while the President watched live on TV.
 
Well, we knew that was coming, there was no way their side was not going to protest and/or riot for very long, and of course it wouldn't be called 'insurrection'. When they did it during Trump's inauguration, it was perfectly fine. They'll continue to change the rules as they see fit, they're in charge of the narrative, so they can do what they want at will. Simply the sad state that we're currently in as a country right now.
 
No, certainly not. It was a clusterfuck of Trump Traitors, some armed, some with a plan, shitting all over the capital, breaking windows, attacking police, threatening to hang pence, shitheads which ultimately played out as sedition while the President watched live on TV.

Yeah, equivalent to rioting and attacking the Whitehouse and surrounding buildings in 2016, as you said 'shitting all over the capital, breaking windows, burning down churches, attacking police, all played out as sedition. I'm guessing you watched live on TV cheering them on.
 
Yeah, equivalent to rioting and attacking the Whitehouse and surrounding buildings in 2016, as you said 'shitting all over the capital, breaking windows, burning down churches, attacking police, all played out as sedition. I'm guessing you watched live on TV cheering them on.
Do you think this somehow justifies the Trump traitors?
 
Demonstrating what, Derp? That you're full of shit. Well, mission accomplished then. :)

Now, go back to crying bitterly over protests at a state house that had no chance of overthrowing the government of the United States. :rolleyes:
Demonstrating that the double standard was rubbed up in your face, and you idiotically declared that it doesn't exist.

But that's the norm for you intellectually bankrupt lunatics.
 
Yeah, equivalent to rioting and attacking the Whitehouse and surrounding buildings in 2016, as you said 'shitting all over the capital, breaking windows, burning down churches, attacking police, all played out as sedition. I'm guessing you watched live on TV cheering them on.
False equivalence. Who was convicted of sedition in 2016?

Expected logic by the right though to dishonestly dismiss their traitorous actions.

Now-a-days, if a lefty stubs their tow on a government building trumpers cry INSURRECTION!
 

Forum List

Back
Top