Its interesting the “Whistleblowers” on Trump did not have their lives in danger, but the Biden ones do

The FBI has been retaliating against Whistleblowers ... and now they are concetned about one?

I smell bullshit.

The FBI issuing a public warning that this Whistleblower might be killed sounds like somethibg they would put out to cover their ass before killing this person themselves.

Yeah that is text book senario.
 
Just to make clear, it’s not the whistleblower that fears for their life, it’s the informant.

The FBI is right to protect confidential sources. It makes me wonder why Congress is so intent on disseminating their information.
 
Its the image they try to push and agenda to create where they want Americans to think republicans are these dangerous and violent people that want to always destroy everything and everyone.

They constantly pretend to be the veritable babe in the words.. always the innocent victims. Despite always being the ones to call for protests, censorship, ignoring things like BLM riots, demanding others think what they think and so on.
 
The key question is, which party is the FBI going to be loyal to? It should be a question that doesn't need to be asked. Their loyalty simply has to be with the president in the American system.

But the time has come for everybody coming to the realization that the war against Russia is ill-conceived and fraught with danger for America.

Highly intelligent people within the FBI will be torn on which side can earn their loyalty.
NO….the FBI does not have to be loyal to the president. That means that if we get a corrupt president, their loyalty precludes their honest investigation - and keeps the FBI from turning over evidence to Congress when subpoenaed.

The FBI needs to be independent and objective without being loyal to one side or the other.
 
NO….the FBI does not have to be loyal to the president. That means that if we get a corrupt president, their loyalty precludes their honest investigation - and keeps the FBI from turning over evidence to Congress when subpoenaed.

The FBI needs to be independent and objective without being loyal to one side or the other.
The FBI is not independent or objective.
 
Or maybe Republicans are full of shit and not telling you the truth.

Crazy, right? Why would they do that?
Then why won’t the FBI turn over the incriminating document that the very credible whistleblower reported? Instead, the make a veiled threat that if they turn it over, the whistleblower might be killed.
 
Then why won’t the FBI turn over the incriminating document that the very credible whistleblower reported? Instead, the make a veiled threat that if they turn it over, the whistleblower might be killed.
The FBI has made it very clear that the informant is a confidential source and that disseminating the document would be violating they confidentiality.

They have provided the Republicans the opportunity to review the document in a protected environment.

Haven’t the Republicans told you this?
 
Which party are the authoritarians?

The FBI says the Biden Whistleblower may be killed?

Have they ever protected anyone before?

seems like they have….why not now?



We know who killed Seth Rich, but the DOJ is withholding evidence for 65 years?

We know Big Pharma covered up bad test results on the “vax” but the evidenve cannot come out for 65 years?

The CIA intentionally lied about the Hunter Biden laptop.

This is the most corrupt DOJ in history.

They arent worried about Biden doing a hit on the guy. The concern is who the Biden's did business with. Every last one of them are shady as fuck and more than capable of murdering a witness.
 
The FBI has made it very clear that the informant is a confidential source and that disseminating the document would be violating they confidentiality.

They have provided the Republicans the opportunity to review the document in a protected environment.

Haven’t the Republicans told you this?
Nope. Wray only briefed a few people, but is refusing to turn over the document itself to Congress. The excuse that the informant is a confidential source is just that. Simply don’t disclose the source, but hand over the document that details BIden’s bribes and the instructions to set up shell companies to disguise the illegal payments.
 
The FBI has been retaliating against Whistleblowers ... and now they are concetned about one?

I smell bullshit.

The FBI issuing a public warning that this Whistleblower might be killed sounds like somethibg they would put out to cover their ass before killing this person themselves.
The whistleblowers are working against the FBI. Their source HELPS the FBI. Thats the difference.
 
Nope. Wray only briefed a few people, but is refusing to turn over the document itself to Congress. The excuse that the informant is a confidential source is just that. Simply don’t disclose the source, but hand over the document that details BIden’s bribes and the instructions to set up shell companies to disguise the illegal payments.
It is possible that Wray is doing a real investigation on this matter. We cant rule that out. His concern about blowing the case might be legit. The problem is, the FBI hasnt given us much reason to trust them anymore.
 
The FBI has been retaliating against Whistleblowers ... and now they are concetned about one?

I smell bullshit.

The FBI issuing a public warning that this Whistleblower might be killed sounds like somethibg they would put out to cover their ass before killing this person themselves.
Yup….it’s a veiled threat.

It also serves as a warning to other patriotic Americans who are thinking of pulling the curtain back on what has become the FBI.
 
It is possible that Wray is doing a real investigation on this matter. We cant rule that out. His concern about blowing the case might be legit. The problem is, the FBI hasnt given us much reason to trust them anymore.
Not after how the FBI conspired with Hillary to create the Russian conspiracy hoax in order to oust a duly elected president.
 
The FBI has made it very clear that the informant is a confidential source and that disseminating the document would be violating they confidentiality.

They have provided the Republicans the opportunity to review the document in a protected environment.

Haven’t the Republicans told you this?
But they wont give them the document, which would then allow them to show it to the public. The DOJ isnt doing shit unless there is massive outrage in the public pushing them to indict.
 
Nope. Wray only briefed a few people, but is refusing to turn over the document itself to Congress. The excuse that the informant is a confidential source is just that. Simply don’t disclose the source, but hand over the document that details BIden’s bribes and the instructions to set up shell companies to disguise the illegal payments.
Yes, he briefed the people on the oversight committee who had subpoenaed the document.

“Simply don’t disclose the source” is pretty naive. The document itself provides information that would potentially identify the source. You can’t just black out the name and pretend that is sufficient.

Spreading the document around is a risk to law enforcement and there is a well established precedent that the DoJ does not discuss these matters with Congress until they are settled and even then they still protect confidential information.
 
But they wont give them the document, which would then allow them to show it to the public. The DOJ isnt doing shit unless there is massive outrage in the public pushing them to indict.
I know! Beside they’re protecting a confidential source. How hard is that to understand?
 

Forum List

Back
Top