WASHINGTON - President Bush, under growing political pressure, agreed Thursday to negotiate with Congress on a war-spending bill that sets benchmarks for progress in Iraq.
The turnabout in Bush's position came as Republicans expressed anxieties about the war and the House was expected to pass legislation that would cut off funding for U.S. troops as early as July.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070510/ap_on_go_pr_wh/us_iraq
And some of you thought the Dems were gonna crack first...
Dems still wasting time - with the troops still in harms way
House OKs war funds until July
By S.A. Miller and Joseph Curl
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
The House last night ignored a veto threat and passed a bill to ration war funds, hours after President Bush for the first time offered to negotiate Iraq benchmarks with the Democrat-led Congress.
The bill, which would fund the war in two-month installments and sets up a possible troop withdrawal in August, passed in a 221-205 vote, with Democrats backing the bill by 219-10 and Republicans opposed by 195-2.
A separate House bill for a prompt troop pullout died on a 255-171 vote, significantly more support than expected, with 169 Democrats and two Republicans, voting for the immediate pullout and sending a loud message to Mr. Bush.
The president rejected the fund-rationing scheme as "haphazard, piecemeal funding" and vowed to veto it, as he did last week to a $124 billion bill with a timetable to withdrawal troops as soon as July.
But in an about-face from his demand for war funds free of conditions or restrictions, Mr. Bush agreed to consider a bill that measures Iraqi progress, such as reducing sectarian violence, establishing a militia-disarmament program and enacting laws to share oil revenue.
"One message I have heard from people from both parties is that the idea of benchmarks makes sense -- and I agree," Mr. Bush said at the Pentagon after meeting with top military strategists.
He said he charged White House Chief of Staff Joshua B. Bolten, who has spearheaded war-funding negotiations with Congress, to "find common ground on benchmarks."
But the concession did little to close the gulf separating the White House and Congress because Democrats want benchmarks that include mandatory consequences if they are not met, something the Bush administration is expected to resist.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he welcomed the president's change of heart, but he wants the end of combat operations.
"Democrats remain united in our efforts to change course in Iraq and enact a strategy that makes America more secure," the Nevada Democrat said. "A bipartisan majority of Congress has already concluded that we need more than simple benchmarks without any consequences to accomplish this goal."
House Majority Leader John A. Boehner said he and other Republicans have long supported setting benchmarks but oppose using them to choke off war funds or force a precipitous troop withdrawal.
He compared policy benchmarks for Iraq to the sales goals he set when he owned a packaging business in his home state of Ohio.
http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070511-122107-7228r.htm