Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Needs to be felony to make accusations of fraud with no proof months before a electionThe poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
It already is a crime and is why the unofficial "watchers" were kept away from the actual poll workers.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
Poll watchers are not needed. That is why you have poll Judges. Watchers are a Republican invention. I never saw a Democratic poll watcher.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
Show me the law for that! As a long time Poll worker I never saw a watcher until Republicans came up with that brilliant idea.It already is a crime and is why the unofficial "watchers" were kept away from the actual poll workers.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
You prefer a Police state, yet are too lazy to donate a day to work at the polls?The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
I voted for many years in Baltimore, where Republicans rarely win anything, but always had poll watchers at the polling places. Dedication isn't the question; it was the motives of the self-appointed "watchers". They were there to intimidate. It's a tactic which we saw the culmination of on 1/6.Show me the law for that! As a long time Poll worker I never saw a watcher until Republicans came up with that brilliant idea. Go work at the polls then spout. It is a long, hard day made up of volunteers who care about elections!It already is a crime and is why the unofficial "watchers" were kept away from the actual poll workers.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
You voted in a place where they count the votes as you voted?I voted for many years in Baltimore, where Republicans rarely win anything, but always had poll watchers at the polling places. Dedication isn't the question; it was the motives of the self-appointed "watchers". They were there to intimidate. It's a tactic which we saw the culmination of on 1/6.Show me the law for that! As a long time Poll worker I never saw a watcher until Republicans came up with that brilliant idea. Go work at the polls then spout. It is a long, hard day made up of volunteers who care about elections!It already is a crime and is why the unofficial "watchers" were kept away from the actual poll workers.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
Boom. Full stopNo official poll watchers were kicked out so this is a moot point.
Poll watchers are not needed. That is why you have poll Judges. Watchers are a Republican invention. I never saw a Democratic poll watcher.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
I voted for many years in Baltimore, where Republicans rarely win anything, but always had poll watchers at the polling places. Dedication isn't the question; it was the motives of the self-appointed "watchers". They were there to intimidate. It's a tactic which we saw the culmination of on 1/6.Show me the law for that! As a long time Poll worker I never saw a watcher until Republicans came up with that brilliant idea. Go work at the polls then spout. It is a long, hard day made up of volunteers who care about elections!It already is a crime and is why the unofficial "watchers" were kept away from the actual poll workers.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
Because I was an honest Judge and so were my Republican friends. We made sure things were run according to the law. We respected each other!Poll watchers are not needed. That is why you have poll Judges. Watchers are a Republican invention. I never saw a Democratic poll watcher.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
Imagine that. The left doesn't like poll watchers. I wonder why.
I voted for many years in Baltimore, where Republicans rarely win anything, but always had poll watchers at the polling places. Dedication isn't the question; it was the motives of the self-appointed "watchers". They were there to intimidate. It's a tactic which we saw the culmination of on 1/6.Show me the law for that! As a long time Poll worker I never saw a watcher until Republicans came up with that brilliant idea. Go work at the polls then spout. It is a long, hard day made up of volunteers who care about elections!It already is a crime and is why the unofficial "watchers" were kept away from the actual poll workers.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
I never found poll watchers intimidating, except the again I wasn't committing voter fraud.
I can remember when y'all found "poll watchers" intimidating.I never found poll watchers intimidating, except the again I wasn't committing voter fraud.I voted for many years in Baltimore, where Republicans rarely win anything, but always had poll watchers at the polling places. Dedication isn't the question; it was the motives of the self-appointed "watchers". They were there to intimidate. It's a tactic which we saw the culmination of on 1/6.Show me the law for that! As a long time Poll worker I never saw a watcher until Republicans came up with that brilliant idea. Go work at the polls then spout. It is a long, hard day made up of volunteers who care about elections!It already is a crime and is why the unofficial "watchers" were kept away from the actual poll workers.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
Who said they did not like poll watchers? We were nice to them, they reciprocated. We only had them in Presidential elections. But I had no problems. They said themselves they were not needed. We just let them do certain things because they wanted to. Were bored.Poll watchers are not needed. That is why you have poll Judges. Watchers are a Republican invention. I never saw a Democratic poll watcher.The poll watchers need to be instructed to call law enforcement and online news sites if they are barred from doing their job. It should also be a felony to interfere with them. The policeman would be away from the voting stations, except if a poll watcher is kicked out, they could quickly walk to a policeman to request assistance in resolving the issue.
Imagine that. The left doesn't like poll watchers. I wonder why.
