It begins. Shapiro throws Kamala under the bus

I have no idea. I am retired and doing my own thing, no kind of activist, not on any mailing list or email list. I get nothing from either party. I routinely turn down requests from Right and Left, that make it to my email, then tell outlook to block sender.

My plan is to watch who these idiots put forth, keep reading the news, and when the time comes, pull the lever for the one that seem like might do the least damage to the country, at the time. There certainly is no savior out there. There is nobody worthy of getting behind. If the far right fails to instigate a shooting civil war, we will get a chance to swing the pendulum back toward the center, fully figuring, the far left if given a chance will move it way, too far, past center, again. If the far right does get it's shooting war, I plan to sit it out, unless somebody shoots at me or mine, forcing me to shoot them, until no longer a threat.
What's far left to you though?
 
You know that. I know that. But people who now allow somebody like AOC to achieve top leadership in the Democrat Party are also likely to see Kamala as a credible candidate to govern California.

I'm more and more coming to believe you can't fix stupid.
She is not running for governor. Try to keep up!
 
What's far left to you though?
What? Or do you mean, who? How do you classify left vs far left. One man's left is another man's far left. Heck, to the far right or committed right, a centrist is ofter thought of as far left. I would imagine the similar logic could be taken for either side.
You got a list of candidates, for either side, at this point? I don't.
 
Yeah, you did!

"Kamala as a credible candidate to govern California."

If not what you meant, then what the fudge does that say? She can't be a credible candidate if she is not a candidate.
When you take a phrase out of its context and pretend it said something that was not said, you not only change what was intended, but you show yourself as a dishonest person. Have a lovely evening.
 
When you take a phrase out of its context and pretend it said something that was not said, you not only change what was intended, but you show yourself as a dishonest person. Have a lovely evening.
FUVM. You just won't admit you fudged up!

You cannot explain how she is a credible candidate if she is not a candidate?
 
FUVM. You just won't admit you fudged up!

You cannot explain how she is a credible candidate if she is not a candidate?
I can't explain it because she isn't. You are too dishonest to admit that I didn't say she is and deliberately took my comments out of their full context to pretend I said something I didn't. And that is despicable.
 

President wanna be Shapiro hammers Harris. Opening salvo for 2028. Of course Shapiro has to get by Newsome and Fat Pritzer in the dem primary first.
He's right. She's only interested in selling books.
 

President wanna be Shapiro hammers Harris. Opening salvo for 2028. Of course Shapiro has to get by Newsome and Fat Pritzer in the dem primary first.
It would be ******* hilarious if the Non-Jew turned out to be more of a Zionist than the Jew. Jussayin
 
I know next to nothing of shapiro, but wouldn't want Kamila, if there were any choice, at all. She should not bother to run.
She is the best choice. You seem to have a problem with her and it really isn't based on facts.
 
She never really had a shot, nor did she deserve one.
She lost by 1.5 percent. She did have a chance. And what's worse for you is that everything she said would happen has.
 
15th post
She lost by 1.5 percent. She did have a chance. And what's worse for you is that everything she said would happen has.
You have a vivid imagination.
 
Back
Top Bottom