What I mean, is what I said. Which part confused you?Tell me what you think consensus represents?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What I mean, is what I said. Which part confused you?Tell me what you think consensus represents?
your use of consensus. stop pivoting and explain your use.What I mean, is what I said. Which part confused you?
I explained it. We need to stop slamming through legislation with a slim partisan majority. I don't the patience to dumb it down any more than that.your use of consensus. stop pivoting and explain your use.
Yes, that is a concern. But how many kids are born to unwed parents as it is, and the courts figure out how to deal with it.I am very far left and agree completely.ved
The only concern I have is that is government does not record marriages, then who has responsibility for the children if the marriage splits up?
How does that work in China and Russia?
Not sure I would be willing to leap into that type of election.
It seems the rest of the world for the most part are electing
dictators, authoritarians, totalitarians.
Fully disagree with your take on this. Populism is dangerous and it very likely will take away representation
of less populated states. When do you think that a party other than the democrats will win Ca. again?
Our FF's were smart enough to protect 'We the People' from an overbearing government.
Being a message board libertarian means you can attack everyone and never have to defend anything.
Like anything. It's the Swiss army knife of political ideologies for the message board poster who hates playing defense.Like what.
Like anything. It's the Swiss army knife of political ideologies for the message board poster who hates playing defense.
You'll never get a candidate on the ballot so you never have to defend their actions. Libertarian ideas will never be tried so you will never have to defend the consequences. You get to act like you've found the path to utopia and everyone else are just blind fools. It exalts the individual to an almost divine level to match how the narcissist Internet Libertarian sees himself. To most it's more a discussion board dodge than anything else. At best it's a none of the above choice at the ballot box.Okay. Well just pick one thing.
Okay. Well just pick one thing.
You'll never get a candidate on the ballot so you never have to defend their actions. Libertarian ideas will never be tried so you will never have to defend the consequences. You get to act like you've found the path to utopia and everyone else are just blind fools. It exalts the individual to an almost divine level to match how the narcissist Internet Libertarian sees himself. To most it's more a discussion board dodge than anything else. At best it's a none of the above choice at the ballot box.
Oh, I see what you're saying.You'll never get a candidate on the ballot so you never have to defend their actions. Libertarian ideas will never be tried so you will never have to defend the consequences. You get to act like you've found the path to utopia and everyone else are just blind fools. It exalts the individual to an almost divine level to match how the narcissist Internet Libertarian sees himself. To most it's more a discussion board dodge than anything else.
Do you really think we are unable to vote for anyone but republicans and democrats?opposed to what?
did I suggest that one couldn't? I voted for Trump, he was an independent. He realized without getting under the GOP tag, he would be swept away. So he challenged the GOP candidates as an independent but under GOP tag so as not to lose out as a third box on the ballot. Genius I say. Why aren't any of the folks you wish to vote for creative enough to remove the competition like Trump? Voting for a third line candidate on a ballot for a general election will always lose. Trump knew this from Ross Perot's fail attempt as a third party. BTW, third party candidate who won? Teddy Roosevelt.Do you really think we are unable to vote for anyone but republicans and democrats?
It's time we took the power back from corrupt political parties. But we won't.
Do you really think we are unable to vote for anyone but republicans and democrats?
It's time we took the power back from corrupt political parties. But we won't.
100% correct, we won't. That's why you vote for the people closest to your views instead of waiting the rest of your life for one that addresses every concern of yours.
Just curious how far you'd take that logic. Would you fret over the differences between Stalin and Hitler, for example? Or would you say "no thanks" to both?