Israelis Now Bombing Rafah Designated "Safe Zone" Where Civilians Have Been Pushed

Hamas is being righteously punished for its violation of internation law on October 7, 1948.

No one is going to interfere with Israel finishing the job that must be done.
 
Hahahaha…Hamas kills a few hundred and your beloved Zionists murder 30k half of whom are kids, and intend to murder thousands more, but you still support the Zionists.

You must really love Dark Brandon, yet you claim to be MAGA.
:uhoh3: :uhoh3: :uhoh3: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :cuckoo: :ahole-1:
View attachment 901593
Aw boohoo! Yes of course I’m a proud Zionist! And so are at least majority of this country! Nothing wrong with it, It is the belief that Jews should to have a homeland if their own in their ancestral and religious holy land. You Muslims have your “Islamic republic of this and that” shitholes as well as your two holiest sites of Mecca and Medina (which by the way the intolerant barbaric Neanderthals don’t let a non Muslim set foot in those shitholes…because Islam is so “tolerant” bwahahaha), and…you also have about 99% of the land mass in the region. So if you don’t like it, get lost to the Muslim cesspool of hatred and medieval savagery you came from. This is the way it’s going to be Abdullah.

What is an abomination and national suicide is us letting Muslim enemy within assholes like you in this country, with no vetting whatsoever. The sooner Trump gets in and we deport your asses out, the better off and safer we will be!
 
I could remind you that it was Zionists who started the Hebron riots by claiming the Wailing Wall was there's! I could also remind you that over 400 Jewish lives were saved by their Arab neighbor's. But you don't want to hear anything about that.
Actually it was the Nazi Mufti who spread false rumors which caused the Hebron massacre, dipshit.
 
They never left Gaza. They have maintained an illegal and immoral blockade of Gaza for the last 16 years that has made Palestinian life a living hell.
:cuckoo: No matter how many it’s proven that there was no blockade, you will still repeat the same vomit.
 
Good question! Off the top of my head, I would say for political gain?
Yes indeed! Every Palestinian death sends tingles down their legs. And let's not forget what a blessing martyrdom is. Those dead Palestinians received gifts from Allah! Hamas just played Santa, kinda. That was very generous of them, in a 'death cult'-way of thinking.

I like you. I want you to know that. Would you like to do a thought experiment with me?

Imagine that Flight 93 -- the 4th plane to crash on 9/11 -- had taken off, say, 25 minutes earlier (Flight 93 was delayed by this amount of time). Shanksville being 163 miles from DC, Flight 93 would have been on a bearing to strike the White House or Capitol Building within about 30 minutes, from the time the passengers revolted.

No passengers would have revolted, until the plane was already very close to its target, if at all (they would not have heard the news until 29 minutes after takeoff, which is probably just before or after Flight 93 would have hit its target)

Flight 93 would have been taken down by the US military, at or prior to this point:

Fighter pilots recall mission to take down Flight 93 on 9/11

Now, answer me this:

On whose hands would the blood of the passengers of Flight 93 been on, had the US military taken it down?

Please first answer this question, then tear the 'thought experiment' down, if it suits you. It's not meant to be an equivalence. Just a first step.
 
Last edited:
RE: Israelis Now Bombing Rafah Designated "Safe Zone" Where Civilians Have Been Pushed
SUBTOPIC: Tactics and Objectives
※→ Billo_Really,

If you had bothered to follow the links → you would have come to the ICRC Page of the Law of the Sea "Blockade." That screwed-up webpage you set is misleading in many respects.

(COMMENT)

It was not a "Data Dump." I just responded to more than one question. As I said, blockades are NOT illegal. They just have certain rules that must be followed.

The Rules to a Blockade are covered in the San Remo Manual on International Law Applicable to Armed Conflicts at Sea

Article 93--108 - Methods of Warfare

Blockade
93. A blockade shall be declared and notified to all belligerents and neutral States.
94. The declaration shall specify the commencement, duration, location, and extent of the blockade and the period within which vessels of neutral States may leave the blockaded coastline.
95. A blockade must be effective. The question whether a blockade is effective is a question of fact.
96. The force maintaining the blockade may be stationed at a distance determined by military requirements.
97. A blockade may be enforced and maintained by a combination of legitimate methods and means of warfare provided this combination does not result in acts inconsistent with the rules set out in this document.
98 Merchant vessels believed on reasonable grounds to be breaching a blockade may be captured. Merchant vessels which, after prior warning, clearly resist capture may be attacked.
99. A blockade must not bar access to the ports and coasts of neutral States.
100. A blockade must be applied impartially to the vessels of all States.
101 The cessation, temporary lifting, re-establishment, extension or other alteration of a blockade must be declared and notified as in paragraphs 93 and 94.
102 The declaration or establishment of a blockade is prohibited if:
(a) it has the sole purpose of starving the civilian population or denying it other objects essential for its survival; or
(b) the damage to the civilian population is, or may be expected to be, excessive in relation to the concrete and direct military advantage anticipated from the blockade.
103. If the civilian population of the blockaded territory is inadequately provided with food and other objects essential for its survival, the blockading party must provide for free passage of such foodstuffs and other essential supplies, subject to:
(a) the right to prescribe the technical arrangements, including search, under which such passage is permitted; and
(b) the condition that the distribution of such supplies shall be made under the local supervision of a Protecting Power or a humanitarian organization which offers guarantees of impartiality, such as the International Committee of the Red Cross.
104. The blockading belligerent shall allow the passage of medical supplies for the civilian population or for the wounded and sick members of armed forces, subject to the right to prescribe technical arrangements, including search, under which such passage is permitted.
Zones
105. A belligerent cannot be absolved of its duties under international humanitarian law by establishing zones which might adversely affect the legitimate uses of defined areas of the sea.
106. Should a belligerent, as an exceptional measure, establish such a zone:
(a) the same body of law applies both inside and outside the zone;
(b) the extent, location and duration of the zone and the measures imposed shall not exceed what is strictly required by military necessity and the principles of proportionality;
(c) due regard shall be given to the rights of neutral States to legitimate uses of the seas;
(d) necessary safe passage through the zone for neutral vessels and aircraft shall be provided:
(i) where the geographical extent of the zone significantly impedes free and safe access to the ports and
coasts of a neutral State;
(ii) in other cases where normal navigation routes are affected, except where military requirements do
not permit; and
(e) the commencement, duration, location and extent of the zone, as well as the restrictions imposed, shall be publicly declared and appropriately notified.
107. Compliance with the measures taken by one belligerent in the zone shall not be construed as an act harmful to the opposing belligerent.
108. Nothing in this Section should be deemed to derogate from the customary belligerent right to control neutral vessels and aircraft in the immediate vicinity of naval operations.


The training manual on Occupation is NOT the Law. Chapter VII Article 51 Covers Self-Defense. Article 68 of the Fourth Geneva Convention covers the prosecution in the attacks against the Israelis.

1705961662938.png

Most Respectfully,
R


When was the last time you went for more than two days without food and water?

Since you're desperately trying to justify the intentional starvation of others, the answer must be "never".

The country that never quits whining about their profitable Holocaust are showing the world that it is only an extortion tool from which Israelis have apparently learned only how to inflict genocide with impunity.

The inmates of Auschwitz ate better than the residents of Gaza. (1)


"Israel: Starvation Used as Weapon of War in Gaza"​


EXCERPT "Human Rights Watch has reported that the Israeli government is starving civilians, a recognized war crime, as a military tactic. High ranking Israeli officials have publicly supported a complete blockage of humanitarian aid including food and water.

The article presents satellite imagery, interviews with farmers, and statements from humanitarian aid organisations as evidence to the real military action including the destruction of Gaza’s last operation wheat mill.

Human Rights Watch has reviewed these documents and indicates that “orchards, greenhouses, and farmland in northern Gaza have been razed.” There is extreme concern for food security and livelihood in Gaza as a result of targeted starvation military action." CONTINUED



(1). “Allied Forensic Autopsies Confirm Disease, Not Gas”

EXCERPT "Dr. Russell Barton further testified that on entering the camp he had credited stories of deliberate starvation but decided such stories were untrue after inspecting the well equipped kitchens and the meticulously maintained ledgers, dating back to 1942, of food cooked and dispensed each day.

Despite noisily publicised claims and widespread popular notions to the contrary, no researcher has ever been able to document a German policy of extermination through starvation in the German camps.” CONTINUED
 
He’ll soon deny he supported this genocide. Of course, he currently won’t even admit it is a genocide. Proving how deceived he is.

Like many duped Americans, he believes whatever the controlled media tells him. As soon as that media turns on Israel, he’ll realize how dumb he’s been.


I've gotten used to the egregious pro Israeli bias in American MSM and prefer to rely on broader sources of information, eyewitness accounts and friends / family working in the region.

I learned the dishonesty of America's MSM while in the US Military when it parroted things I knew to be false about events in S.E. Asia.

I didn't realize the degree to which American MSM has such an outrageous pro Israel bias until I spent time in and around Palestinian refugee camps during the '73 War.
 
15th post
I didn't realize the degree to which American MSM has such an outrageous pro Israel bias until I spent time in and around Palestinian refugee camps during the '73 War.

Did you see the ones in Yarmouk, Syria?


IMG_2421.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom