Israelis Now Bombing Rafah Designated "Safe Zone" Where Civilians Have Been Pushed

Yes but I spent more time around the Palestinian refugee camps in S. Lebanon.

How much time did you spend around Palestinian refugees in 1973?

You’re just revealing yourself. More and more.
 
RE: Israelis Now Bombing Rafah Designated "Safe Zone" Where Civilians Have Been Pushed
SUBTOPIC: Tactics
※→ Grau,
et al,

Like so many others, you have changed the central question from one of military objectives to an argument dominated by the theme → Human Rights and Humanitarian Effort (or lack thereof) to amplify the prospects of an emotional response. It shifts the objective away from → the focus → Seek Out and Engage the Enemy (the Islamic Revolutionary Movement • HAMAS). It very craftily slides the issue away from focusing on the military objective against the aggressor which reopens hostilities - to - victimizing the aggressor. It paints a picture of the Arab Palestinians as these hapless people who were unduly assaulted by the nasty Israelis.

When was the last time you went for more than two days without food and water?

Since you're desperately trying to justify the intentional starvation of others, the answer must be "never".
(COMMENT)

It is astounding that so many pro-Palestinians and anti-Israelis (
most of the general population) in the Gaza Strip do not understand that the conflict can end virtually overnight by the surrender of the Islamic Resistance Movement (HAMAS), the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) (all four of which are designated terrorist organizations) (Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters) which was supported by the general population (aiding and abetting these criminals). This shift from being the aggressor drawing first blood to the victim of the consequence of their action is known as the Fallacy in the Appeal to Emotion.

Day after day the trumpets sound on the results of the conflict which the Arab Palestinians of Gaza started. All they need do is release the hostages and surrender the criminal elements that the general population supported.

1705961662938.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
Oh come on. You just spent all day telling me you have no idea where the borders are between Israel and Palestine in 1948 and then telling me Israel should go back to those unknown borders.
I told you where they are. You're just acting like an angry 2 year old with her fingers in her ear.
 
Yes indeed! Every Palestinian death sends tingles down their legs. And let's not forget what a blessing martyrdom is. Those dead Palestinians received gifts from Allah! Hamas just played Santa, kinda. That was very generous of them, in a 'death cult'-way of thinking.

I like you. I want you to know that. Would you like to do a thought experiment with me?

Imagine that Flight 93 -- the 4th plane to crash on 9/11 -- had taken off, say, 25 minutes earlier (Flight 93 was delayed by this amount of time). Shanksville being 163 miles from DC, Flight 93 would have been on a bearing to strike the White House or Capitol Building within about 30 minutes, from the time the passengers revolted.

No passengers would have revolted, until the plane was already very close to its target, if at all (they would not have heard the news until 29 minutes after takeoff, which is probably just before or after Flight 93 would have hit its target)

Flight 93 would have been taken down by the US military, at or prior to this point:

Fighter pilots recall mission to take down Flight 93 on 9/11

Now, answer me this:

On whose hands would the blood of the passengers of Flight 93 been on, had the US military taken it down?

Please first answer this question, then tear the 'thought experiment' down, if it suits you. It's not meant to be an equivalence. Just a first step.
The blood would be on the hijackers hands.
 
15th post
Back
Top Bottom