Israelis are not Semites
- Thread starter GLASNOST
- Start date
-
- Tags
- israel vs genocide
rosends
Gold Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 4,815
- 1,625
- 198
No as I don't understand German or Arabic.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 78,975
- 43,411
- 2,605
Do you see the hypocrisy of your beliefs, or are you so full of hate you don’t care?
The latest lie embrace by Israel's gaggle of genocidal Zionist shills is that Hamas is responsible for the obscene death toll in Gaza and the West Bank.
It looks like Hamas must have figured out a way to "hot wire" the military aircraft given to Israel bu US taxpayers to further commit genocide.
“Israel kills more than 90 people”
"UN says malnutrition doubled; official calls out Gaza 'genocide'"
EXCERPT “Malnutrition rates among children in the Gaza Strip doubled since Israel imposed sharp restrictions on the entry of food in March, the U.N. said Tuesday. New Israeli strikes killed more than 90 Palestinians, including dozens of women and children, health officials said.
One of the deadliest strikes hit a house in Gaza City's Tel al-Hawa district on Monday evening and killed 19 members of the family living inside, according to Shifa Hospital. The dead included eight women and six children.” CONTINUED
It's something about Israel's IDFers that that makes women and children especially attractive targets.
rosends
Gold Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 4,815
- 1,625
- 198
No, those I know which explains how I know you are in the wrong.
rosends
Gold Member
- Oct 19, 2012
- 4,815
- 1,625
- 198
You are asking about my beliefs but discussing the BBC's content .weird.
Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,206
- 3,630
- 290
It is disingenuous to attempt to create a false equivalence between the taking of hostages and detaining someone suspected of committing a crime, correctly called a "detainee" in above media quote.
You might think that administrative attention is an abhorrent practice and we could discuss this. But it is in no way equivalent to the taking of hostages.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 78,975
- 43,411
- 2,605
Which only proves you are delusional and full of hate.
Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,206
- 3,630
- 290
Seriously? You can't see the difference between taking civilian hostages and detaining someone suspected of committing a crime? You know they do that in most (all?) countries in the world, right? Detain someone who is suspected of committing a crime. This concept forms part of international law.
The most common legitimate ground for deprivation of liberty is no doubt that a person is reasonably suspected of having committed an offence (see expressis verbis article 5(1)(c) of the European Convention). However, as will be seen below, such suspicion does not justify an indefinite detention. What might be considered acceptable differs from case to case, but, as stipulated in article 9(3) of the Covenant and articles 7(5) and 5(3) of the American and European Conventions respectively, the suspect has a right to be tried “within a reasonable time or to release” pending trial. (Source).
Hostage-taking is universally condemned and contravenes international law.
Article 1. Any person who seizes or detains and threatens to kill, to injure or to continue to detain another person (hereinafter referred to as the "hostage") in order to compel a third party. namely, a State, an international intergovernmental organization, a natural or Juridical person, or a group of persons, to do or abstain from doing any act as an explicit or implicit condition tor the release of the hostage commits the offence of taking of hostages ("hostage-taking") within the meaning of this Convention. 2. (a) (b) Any person who: attempts to commit an act of hostage-taking, or participates as an accomplice of anyone who commits or attempts to commit an act of hostage-taking likewise commits an offence tor the purposes of this Convention. (International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages 17 December 1979)
Further, the State party holds a responsibility to ease the situation of the hostage and secure their release.
Article 3 1. The State Party in the territory of which the hostage ;~ held by the offender shall take all measures it considers appropriate to ease the situation of the hostage, in particular, to secure his release and, after his release, to facilitate, when relevant, his departure.
There is no "hate" here. Just a logical, objective understanding of both law and morality.
Now, I know you understand perfectly well the difference between detention and hostage-taking. And I know you understand perfectly well that there is no moral equivalence between them. What you are really trying to argue is that Palestinians do not commit acts of terror or crime and that (due to the inherent evil nature of "Zionists", by which you mean Israelis/Jews) Israel takes random Palestinians "just because".
And yet you call me delusional. Laughable.
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 78,975
- 43,411
- 2,605
Last edited:
Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,206
- 3,630
- 290
Traitor to whom?
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 78,975
- 43,411
- 2,605
Your country.
Shusha
Gold Member
- Dec 14, 2015
- 16,206
- 3,630
- 290
What would be traitorous to Canada?
Toddsterpatriot
Diamond Member
Not drinking Labatt's?
Cheering for the Blackhawks?
Eating Dunkin' Donuts instead of Tim Horton's?
gipper
Diamond Member
- Jan 8, 2011
- 78,975
- 43,411
- 2,605
Pledging your allegiance to the Zionist apartheid regime, like most US politicians do.
Don't Canadian politicians do the same?
Similar threads
- Locked
- Locked
New Topics
-
-
If we can bomb iran and remove its leader from the gene pool
- Started by Hurricanelover
- Replies: 4
-
-
Russia Remade Its Economy for War, but It’s Come at a Huge Cost - The New York Times- Started by peacefan
- Replies: 2
