Israelis are not Semites

Apparently, you can't find any source / link that shows the quote to be fake.
How does one show something to be fake? The one who makes the claim that something exists is the one upon whom it is incumbent to present supporting evidence.
Until you can, I'll continue to cite as valid evidence of Zionist parasitism and deception.
except it isn't evidence, any more than if I said "Abbas said that he eats babies for breakfast."
Re:


No, I am simply repulsed by war mongering and traitorous Zionist shills for whom no amount of American blood or resources are enough for their "Greater Israel".
fortunately, that has nothing to do with what you presented.
 
That's neither what I wrote nor what I believe.
this is what you wrote: "I look to see if a credible source shows it ti be fake, then I'll post it and wait for someone to show that it's fake."

If you find a credible source to show something is fake, do you post it anyway?
If you don't find a source that shows it to be fake do you assume that it is therefore real?

Show where anything I've written or cited is false or move along.
I have shown where you are posting things that are unsourced and unsubstantiated (like that other "quote" from Netanyahu that has as its only source, a 2005 website that claims, "he was once overheard by an ex-CIA agent as saying to a group of his supporters," which is not much of a source). This is intellectually dishonest on your part. The quotes are false and you repeat them even after being shown that they have no support or credible source. That's false. Move along.
 
so you start by assuming everything is true unless a credible source shows it to be fake? Wow.
That's neither what I wrote nor what I believe. Show where anything I've written or cited is false or move along.
Do you know what a Hasbara shill is? I think you know what it is now. :welcome:
 
I hope you'll agree that I support what I write by using more sources / links than most people here.
You understand the difference between a "source" and a "link", yes?

The repetition of a lie by many people does not transform the lie into a truth. Posting multiple links of people telling the lie does not confirm that the lie is the truth. This is nothing more than a variation of the bandwagon fallacy.

Sources are not popularity contests. Sources provide information on the facts of the matter. Who said it. When they said it. Who the audience was. Where it was first published. The context for the statement.
 
You understand the difference between a "source" and a "link", yes?

The repetition of a lie by many people does not transform the lie into a truth. Posting multiple links of people telling the lie does not confirm that the lie is the truth. This is nothing more than a variation of the bandwagon fallacy.

Sources are not popularity contests. Sources provide information on the facts of the matter. Who said it. When they said it. Who the audience was. Where it was first published. The context for the statement.


Yes, I know that there is a difference between a "Link" and a "source"

Thats why I wrote: "source / link".

Re:
The repetition of a lie by many people does not transform the lie into a truth.

Yes, I agree, that's why I'm waiting for someone to show that the quote was false (aka "a lie").

There are several links that cite fake Zionist quotes. I looked over 4 of them and the quote I cited is not among the ones listed as fake.

I've done more than anyone questioning that quote to show that it is at least commonly accepted as valid but when I ask for proof that it's fake, all I hear are crickets.

I'm also amused to read from individuals who repeatedly parrot the most outrageous lies suddenly become so demanding when it comes validating claims, statements and /or quotes that they don't like.

Finally, I don't doubt that if I produced a video of Netanyahu confirming these quotes that certain individuals would howl about "Pallywood", "fake video" etc.

Thanks,
 
Apparently, you can't find any source / link that shows the quote to be real.


I can find numerous sources / links confirming that the quote is valid.

But....

You can't find even one that claims it to be false.

Go figure.
 
this is what you wrote: "I look to see if a credible source shows it ti be fake, then I'll post it and wait for someone to show that it's fake."

If you find a credible source to show something is fake, do you post it anyway?
If you don't find a source that shows it to be fake do you assume that it is therefore real?


I have shown where you are posting things that are unsourced and unsubstantiated (like that other "quote" from Netanyahu that has as its only source, a 2005 website that claims, "he was once overheard by an ex-CIA agent as saying to a group of his supporters," which is not much of a source). This is intellectually dishonest on your part. The quotes are false and you repeat them even after being shown that they have no support or credible source. That's false. Move along.


Re:
The quotes are false...

Prove it or move along.
 
Yes, I agree, that's why I'm waiting for someone to show that the quote was false (aka "a lie").
One can not prove that someone DIDN'T say something. The onus is on you to demonstrate that they did say something.
I've done more than anyone questioning that quote
You have no way to know that.
to show that it is at least commonly accepted as valid
again bandwagon fallacy
Finally, I don't doubt that if I produced a video of Netanyahu confirming these quotes that certain individuals would howl about "Pallywood", "fake video" etc.
AI video fakes are a real thing, you know. There are tells, at least at this point in time.

The problem with this quote, in particular, is that the "sources" are all tertiary. No primary or secondary source. No evidence whatsoever about the circumstances of this quote. No major, or even minor newspaper reports. Apparently, circulating since at least 2008?

Thin air is thin air.
 
I can find numerous sources / links confirming that the quote is valid.
Nope. You have provided numerous links confirming that someone THINKS the quote is valid, not that it IS.
 
15th post
Just noting that instead of responding to what I wrote, you went in a totally different direction.
Sorry I don’t usually read posts by those supporting mass murdering. Would you read Mein Kampf?
 
Back
Top Bottom