Israeli strikes kill at least 12 Palestinians in Gaza on New Year’s Day

Tommy Tainant

Diamond Member
Jan 20, 2016
52,807
23,529
2,300
Y Cae Ras

The victims wwere mainly women and children as usual.Its a good job that there are unlikely to be repucussions from this slaughter of innocents. And it is a long was away after all.
 

The victims wwere mainly women and children as usual.Its a good job that there are unlikely to be repucussions from this slaughter of innocents. And it is a long was away after all.

I got Muslims running over partygoers within 30 miles of me. I don't give two shits about a bunch of fucking whackos who attacked Israel and are paying the price.
 

The victims wwere mainly women and children as usual.Its a good job that there are unlikely to be repucussions from this slaughter of innocents. And it is a long was away after all.
Looks like Hamas's human shield plan still works and morons like you eating it up is definitely still a thing.

Funny I never see people like yourself posting the number of Jews killed when Arabs attack ? Why is that ?
 

The victims wwere mainly women and children as usual.Its a good job that there are unlikely to be repucussions from this slaughter of innocents. And it is a long was away after all.
Fact of life: Civilian men, women and children ALWAYS die in wars. If there is a war, there is no avoiding it. Never has been. Isn't now and never will be.
Another fact of life: Of all the religions on this planet, Islam is the most oppressive, tyrannical and murderous of the lot.
The sooner that religion is expunged, the better for humanity.
 
Palestinians normally put women and children in the greatest danger. They believe it gets them sympathy. That and the men are pussy cowards.
 
The victims wwere mainly women and children as usual.Its a good job that there are unlikely to be repucussions from this slaughter of innocents. And it is a long was away after all.
The TARGETS were militants firing indiscriminate rockets (war crime, crime against humanity). The militants need to either surrender or fight (preferably within the rules of armed conflict). I don't care which they choose, but either way they need to remove themselves from civilians and protected places.

Go ahead. Tell me they have "no choice". Wait. Let me save you the trouble.

Militant option 1: Surrender. Remove yourself from the battlefield. Instruct your wife and children to follow IDF instructions, and seek safety away from militant activity. Likely result: You are in prison for some period of time. Your precious wife and children live.

Militant option 2: Fight within the rules of armed conflict. Fight. No one, least of all me, is suggesting you shouldn't. So fight. Just do it away from your wife and children and everyone else's wife and children. Find a nice, bombed-out building (rumor has it there are plenty available) and fight from there. Keep the fight away from the children. Likely result: You die. Your precious wife and children live.

Militant option 3: Fight committing war crimes and crimes against humanity in the midst of innocent civilians. Likely result: You die. Your precious wife and children die.

I know, I know, you will reach the end of this all sputtering and spittling, but there is both a legally and morally correct answer here. (Did you need a hint? It involves the children NOT dying.)

You can not argue that Gaza is largely destroyed and also argue that militants have no possible space to put their military operations except embedded in civilian safe zones and protected places. Is one or other. You can not argue that, in 18 years, Gaza planned an extensive military infrastructure and training regimen to execute such heinous atrocities against Israel's civilians in order to goad them into a war and also argue it was impossible to plan for the safety and security for your civilian population. (As in: Good news! We have 7 Billion dollars! Bad news: we can't spend a single penny on protecting our wives and children). Is one or other.

Option 3 is a CHOICE.
 
Fact of life: Civilian men, women and children ALWAYS die in wars. If there is a war, there is no avoiding it. Never has been. Isn't now and never will be.
Another fact of life: Of all the religions on this planet, Islam is the most oppressive, tyrannical and murderous of the lot.
The sooner that religion is expunged, the better for humanity.
Like in New Orleans.
 
...and yet, "news" sources like The Guardian never mention the fact that Hamas has the power to stop the carnage IMMEDIATELY, by laying down their arms, peacefully surrendering, and accounting for the hostages.

This has been the case in every single conflict in recent human history. If the instigating party would surrender, the conflict would end. And yet in this case, the international news media declines (I did not say, "fails" because they know it) to see that simple fact.

EVERY SINGLE DEATH can be laid squarely at the feet of Hamas, and the "Palestinians" who support them.
 
...and yet, "news" sources like The Guardian never mention the fact that Hamas has the power to stop the carnage IMMEDIATELY, by laying down their arms, peacefully surrendering, and accounting for the hostages.

This has been the case in every single conflict in recent human history. If the instigating party would surrender, the conflict would end. And yet in this case, the international news media declines (I did not say, "fails" because they know it) to see that simple fact.

EVERY SINGLE DEATH can be laid squarely at the feet of Hamas, and the "Palestinians" who support them.
Why should Hamas surrender to terrorists ?
 

Forum List

Back
Top