I'm sure you see it that way.
I'm one of the few posters around here who consistently address the specific things you say and present valid arguments that are contrary to those specific things.
Most people around here just pontificate their views onto others.
And still even more do it with things that are completely irrelevant to someone's post.
Like Hossfly asking me to prove I'm not delusional, when were debating who started the '67 war.
Your childish hyper-reliance upon Literalism and your automatic gainsay, in connection with who committed the first Act of War, in the 1967 Six Day War, has, once again, come back to haunt you, and to bite you in the ass, to the further detriment of the Palestinian and Arab cause, for which you strive so ardently and persistently.
You failed the common-sense and manhood tests, months ago, when you opined that you would wait until the Egyptian Air Force had crossed into your airspace before pulling the trigger, even though it risked thousands of civilian casualties and the destruction of irreplaceable war-assets at a time of heightened threat of invasion and being overrun, just so that you could say that you were abiding by the letter of international law.
With damaged credibility like that, so deep into negative territory, none of the rest matters much.
Not even your persistent ignoring of enemy troop mobilizations and forward deployments, closure of maritime passageways, and public declarations of intent to attack and destroy, by the leadership of multiple enemy-allied nations, as casus belli.
Despite your protestations of neutrality and goodwill, and inconsistent and juvenile attempts to mask your prejudices using strict and literal adherence to international law, your viciousness and extreme bias and intentions are clear enough for anyone with even a modicum of understanding, concerning the Israeli-Palestinian 'Troubles' and their complexity and the extent to which the Palestinians and the Arabs at-large are historically responsible for their own present condition and state of affairs.
Your affirmation - of the assessment of you by others - (
skills, intellect, biases, or character and nature) - is not required, in order for those assessments to become operative, and to hold sway.
Then again, to illustrate your high-order debating skills, you could always post another picture of a (retired) US Navy battleship firing its large guns, and telling us how you would send one of those, and a bunch of US Marines, to stomp on the Israelis, and calling everyone 'fuckers' and 'whores', who doesn't agree with you.
Yeah... yeah...
that's the ticket...
that's addressing the main points in a credible and mature fashion.
Once you start down that road, and become recognized for that sort of name-calling and abuse of your colleagues, it's a little difficult to make a comeback; your debating skills become less important than the fact that it is
you doing it.
A state of affairs for which
you are
solely responsible.
You have a mighty high opinion of yourself - one largely divorced from Reality.
People like you do far more good on behalf of the Israeli cause than you can possibly imagine at your present stage of development and maturity.
