Which part, the last sentence? Not singling out Jews.
The part where you ascribe " rightwing authoritarianism and nationalism"
to Jewish majority parties, comparing them to Iran and Saudi Arabia,
yet relate no harm to any Arab majority parties in Israel,
despite their open Pan-Arab ideology.
Only used to frame Jews.
The Arab parties for the most part seem to have little power and the more extreme get banned. If one of their extremists (particularly one who admired a mass murderer or defended terrorists) were to rise to the top I’d feel the same. It is unlikely to happen though.
Yeah sure...little power.
Despite the result of the previous elections,
gave us a government totally dependent on those
Arab parties, which rightist ideology contradicts your narrative,
as much as associating with any notion of power, and responsibility.
They're only allowed to be described as "helpless victims" of powerful Jews.
They aren’t anywhere close to being in power or having any affect on the nation or it’s population. Every country has it’s nuttier or dangerous political fringes, right? And no one says much about because the don’t have a c nance in hell of acting on their proposed policies. It’s just that now we are starting see parties and ideologies that were once considered fringe actually attain power in the mainstream (and not just in Israel) and these are not ideologies that tend to treat minority populations well.
Much lower percentage of Jews vote in US elections,
yet the power associated with them is beyond cosmic.
Of course, nothing shows a sincere concern for minorities
than singling out Israel for its Arab parties and diverse
population, and never a word about the total absence
of non-Arabs in either of Pal-Arab govts.
Racism of low expectation?
www.usmessageboard.com
