Israel the Monster: Mass-murder of Innocents

[DiveCon]

There are millions dead anyway. Look at the over a million dead in Iraq from the zionist neocons - one example of the gun to the head 'problem' in America

ah, figures a moron like you would still believe that thoroughly debunked lancet report

 

[Godboy]

If the Palestinians had the nukes too they could black mail America the same way terrorist Israel does.

Ok, im begining to see why they think your a moron...

Are you suggesting that Israel is threatening to nuke us if we dont help them with their Palestinian problem? You dont REALLY believe any of that nonsense do you? This is just to spread anti-jew propaganda around, right?

Hey idiot, if the Israelis have nukes, they arent ICBMs, which is the only kind of nuke that you could threaten the US with when your all the way over in the Middles East. Anything other than an "intercontinental balistic missle" isnt going to make the distance. Theres quite a few nations that have nuclear technology, but very few have ICBM capability because it requires spaceflight. I believe only the US, France, China, Russia and India have ICBM capability.

 

[AmericaFirst]

Ok, im begining to see why they think your a moron...

Are you suggesting that Israel is threatening to nuke us if we dont help them with their Palestinian problem? You dont REALLY believe any of that nonsense do you? This is just to spread anti-jew propaganda around, right?

Hey idiot, if the Israelis have nukes, they arent ICBMs, which is the only kind of nuke that you could threaten the US with when your all the way over in the Middles East. Anything other than an "inner continental balistic missle" isnt going to make the distance. Theres quite a few nations that have nuclear technology, but very few have ICBM capability because it requires spaceflight. I believe only the US, France, China, Russia and India have ICBM capability.

Umm - it is there OWN words.

Yes, they have now have ICBM's AND nuclear armed submarines

Yes they are illegal

Yes they stole the nuclear capabilities through a spy network that is deeply penetrated in the DOD and US Pentagon

 

[Godboy]

Yes, they have now have ICBM's AND nuclear armed submarines

Provide proof or take your lies elswhere. I could also claim that the Palestinians are devloping bionic men, but that doesnt mean its true.

 

[AmericaFirst]

ah, figures a moron like you would still believe that thoroughly debunked lancet report

The Red Cross puts the figure around 1,400,000 dead

The depleted Uranium will kill millions more (including our soldiers)

Clinton killed 30 thousand of month through the zionist oil for food program

 

[DiveCon]

the Red Cross Puts The Figure Around 1,400,000 Dead

The Depleted Uranium Will Kill Millions More (including Our Soldiers)

Clinton Killed 30 Thousand Of Month Through The Zionist Oil For Food Program

Wtf?????

 

[AmericaFirst]

Provide proof or take your lies elswhere. I could also claim that the Palestinians are devloping bionic men, but that doesnt mean its true.

If I prove it will you apologize for being an asshole?

What would you consider proof?

 

[Godboy]

Umm - it is there OWN words.

If you were to ask Israel if they have nuclear weapons, they will say no. They officially deny having any nukes, so forgive me if i doubt your silly claim about them suddenyly telling the world about nuclear subs and ICBMs.

Its fairly obvious that you are just making shit up to try and sell your side of the story. Why, if you have to lie, do you take your position? If i had to lie about the facts to make my side sound better, i would have to rethink my position on this conflict.

 

[AmericaFirst]

Wtf?????

Lost for words I see.

 

[AmericaFirst]

If you were to ask Israel if they have nuclear weapons, they will say no. They officially deny having any nukes, so forgive me if i doubt your silly claim about them suddenyly telling the world about nuclear subs and ICBMs.

Its fairly obvious that you are just making shit up to try and sell your side of the story. Why, if you have to lie, do you take your position? If i had to lie about the facts to make my side sound better, i would have to rethink my position on this conflict.

If you did your research you'd know they announced their nuclear capabilities last year.

 

[Godboy]

What would you consider proof

Well, i believe the definition of proof is...evidence sufficient to establish a thing as true.

 

[DiveCon]

Lost for words I see.

yes, your stupidity and overt racism is astounding

 

[Godboy]

If you did your research you'd know they announced their nuclear capabilities last year.

If you did YOUR research, youd find that your statment is totally untrue. Go ahead and look it up at wikipedia, or do a internet search for "does israel have nukes?".

You really should do your homework before trying to shove a bunch of bullshit lies down our throats. You could at least try and tell some lies that could be believed, but everything you talk about is simple to discredit because theres all the facts in the world to back up MY claims.

 

[AmericaFirst]

If you did YOUR research, youd find that your statment is totally untrue. Go ahead and look it up at wikipedia, or do a internet search for "does israel have nukes?".

You really should do your homework before trying to shove a bunch of bullshit lies down our throats. You could at least try and tell some lies that could be believed, but everything you talk about is simple to discredit because theres all the facts in the world to back up MY claims.

Wikipedia is a JOKE

What will be acceptable proof for you? I ask because I want you to learn a lesson.

 

[AmericaFirst]

yes, your stupidity and overt racism is astounding

That's funny, you are defending the most racist country in the entire world.

 

[Godboy]

What will be acceptable proof for you? I ask because I want you to learn a lesson.

Carl Sagan had a chapter in one of his books about an invisible dragon. His invisible dragon scenario was basically a bullshit detector anyone can use. This is how it works...

If i told you i had eggs for breakfast, its not an unreasonable statement, therefore youre problably going to take me at my word and just assume i had eggs. If i told you i had an invisible dragon in my garage that you cant see, taste, smell, touch or hear, your going to say im crazy. You would never in a million years believe that i had an invisible dragon unless i provided "PROOF". The more unbelievable the claim, the more proof is required to make the claim believed.

Now, with that said, you are telling quite a fantastic tale about ICBMs and nuclear subs. Im pretty on top of current news, and since ive never heard of this EVER, youll have to forgive me for doubting you. Your claim is VERY unbelievable, so your proof better be absolutely amazing and unrefutable.

Now, go ahead and dazzle me with your "lesson".

 

[DiveCon]

That's funny, you are defending the most racist country in the entire world.

uh, "the most racist nation in the world"

LOL
not hardly
what i am defending is the truth
which it seems is an alien concept for you

 

[AmericaFirst]

Israel admits stockpiling nuclear weapons

NTI: Country Overviews: Israel: Missile Overview

Israel achieves ICBM capability

Calls for Olmert to resign after nuclear gaffe | World news | The Guardian

Democracy Now! | Headlines for December 12, 2006

UN to press Israel to give up nuclear weapons - Middle East Crisis - www.theage.com.au

UN to press Israel to give up nuclear weapons - Middle East Crisis - www.theage.com.au

CIA reveals: We said in 1974 that Israel had nuclear weapons

Israel Adds Fuel to Nuclear Dispute

Carl Sagan had a chapter in one of his books about an invisable dragon. His invisable dragon scenario was basically a bullshit detector anyone can use. This is how it works...

If i told you i had eggs for breakfast, its not an unreasonable statement, therefore youre problably going to take me at my word and just assume i had eggs. If i told you i had an invisable dragon in my garage that you cant see, taste, smell, touch or hear, your going to say im crazy. You would never in a million years believe that i had an invisable dragon unless i provided "PROOF". The more unbelievable the claim, the more proof is required to make the claim believed.

Now, with that said, you are telling quite a fantastic tale about ICBMs and nuclear subs. Now im pretty on top of current news, and since ive never heard of this EVER, youll have to forgive me for doubting you. Your claim is VERY unbelievable, so your proof better be absolutely amazing and unrefutable.

Now, go ahead and dazzle me with your "lesson".

 

[Godboy]

Um, your confused. I never said Israel didnt have nukes, in fact i said quite the opposite. What i said was Israel does not acknowledge that they have nukes. Everyone knows they have them, thats not the debate.

You claimed that Israel came out and told the world that they had ICBMs and nuclear subs. I said this is not true, and it isnt. Yiou said you would provide proof that they did say this, and you provided no such evidence.

One article talks about a slip of the tongue by the Isreali prime minister, in germany, and there isnt even a quote where he admitted having nukes, so i dont know how that article helps you.

Heres the actual quote ""Iran, openly, explicitly and publicly, threatens to wipe Israel off the map. Can you say that this is the same level, when they are aspiring to have nuclear weapons, as America, France, Israel and Russia?"

That is NOT an ackowledgement by ISRAEL claiming to have nukes.


In another article you provided, there is talk about Israelis having ICBMs, yet there is no proof of it in the article, nor does it say that Israel admitted to having ICBMs, like you claimed.

Where is your lesson? Where is your proof? Im waiting....

 

[Godboy]

...and the article which talks about them having ICBM capability, its still not true. First off, they didnt say they have ICBMs, the article is claiming that since they were able to launch a satellite into space, they must be capable of ICBMs. Even if this were true, that doesnt mean they have any ICBMs built yet. Regardless, launching a satellite into space is nothing compared to launching one into space that will then reenter the Earths atmosphere and hit a target of their choosing. Its one thing to send something into space, its entirely another thing to bring it back under controlled flight.

Besides, even if your Article were absolutely true, the distance they claim the missles could fly isnt far enough to reach the US anyway.

Your definition of proof isnt exactly up to par buddy.