Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end

[toomuchtime_]

The missiles are useless. Israel has made a living out of defeating Russian made air defenses.

Out of thousands of sorties, one plane was hit and it was due to pilot error. Russia has never built an air defense system Israel could not defeat, including the latest ones.

The pilot error was entering Syrian airspace.

"In the tension between completing the task and defending the survival, the professional team made a mistake that did not protect itself as required. His actions did not match the order of priorities required by the missile threat he was in."
Stunning: How the IDF paraphrases "F-16 was shot down"

No, your post shows the pilot failed to take the defensive measures he was taught to take in that situation. Face it, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria.

When it isn´t Iran or Hezbollah it is a shell or missile that ended up in the occupied Golan. The Zionists need to calm down.

Ok, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria and to stop firing shells and missiles into Israel.

 

[Bleipriester]

RE: Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end
⁜→ Bleipriester, et al,

BLUF: If you hadn't guessed, I support the forces operating against the Assad Regime and the Islamic State.

This is all about political choice and foreign policy...

In general, I don't support any discretionary Political-Military (POL-MIL) engagements anywhere in the Middle East Region; from the narrow Strait of Hormuz - westward - to the Mediterranean Sea.

I support the American position on the issue of regional Humanitarian aid. America is one of the larger humanitarian donor nations forces operating against the Assad Leadership in Syria (≈ $8 Billion and growing) providing assistance for displaced people inside Syria and the immediate surrounding region.

Tell me, who are you supporting?

I have always been supporting friendship and cooperation of Syria and Israel, but the land-grabbing policies and terror-support of Israel make it impossible.

(COMMENT)

I see Humanitarian Assistance as separate and distinct from POL-MIL diplomatic and military communications and direct engagements. In that regard, in the authoritarian and military-dominated regime of the Syrian Arab Republic. But I do not think that the US presence or the Israeli air options are going to make a difference in regards to the outlaw Assad Regime. The intractable civil war in Syria opposes the Assad Regime and I'm all for that. But I think that the Syrians should carry the heavy weight.

And I see the third facet as the Iranian connection in the illicit transfer, destabilizing accumulation and misuse of small arms and light weapons (SALW) to hot areas both in Lebanon and Syria (with the intermediate stop in Iraq). It appears that Israel has taken out stockpiles in both Lebanon and Syria. Iran supports Assad and then by extension drags Lebanon and Hezbollah with it. So any strike Israel makes against the Iranians is, by extension, a strike against the Assad Regime. Any anti-Israeli position taken to the strikes is liking it or not, an expression of support for the Assad Regime.


Most Respectfully,
R

But you are in support of the unsupportable. You charge the "Assad regime" but what about those who are fighting it? They were all allies. They are all islamist terrorists.

Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia

No, they are not. There are some Islamic terrorists among Assad's enemies, but keep in mind the Civil war, which has now become a regional sectarian war, began when Assad ordered the massacre of thousands of Sunni, just as his father had done years before, who were peacefully protesting economic conditions due to the encroaching desert, and the original anti Assad force was made up of Syrian soldiers who defected from the Army in protest against this atrocity.

1982 Hama "massacre":
"Islamist insurgency in Syria suppressed, decisive Syrian Army victory"

"The events of the Hama massacre began at 2 am on 3 February 1982. An army unit searching the old city "stumbled on the hideout of the local guerilla commander, Omar Jawwad (aka Abu Bakr) and were ambushed. Other insurgent cells were alerted by radio and "roof-top snipers killed perhaps a score" of Syrian soldiers. Reinforcements were rushed to besiege Abu Bakr who then "gave the order for a general uprising" in Hama. Mosque loudspeakers used for the call to prayer called for jihad against the Ba'ath, and hundreds of Islamic insurgents rose to attack the homes of government officials and Baath Party leaders, overrun police posts and ransack armories. By daybreak of the morning of 3 February some 70 leading Ba'athists had been killed and the Islamist insurgents and other opposition activists proclaimed Hama a "liberated city", urging Syrians to rise up against the "infidel"."
1982 Hama massacre - Wikipedia

Got it?

"Preceding the massacre the regime started to provoke practises against the citizens by killing, arresting, bombing houses and abusing the children, women and elderly this was the spark, which lead to the ignition of the bloodshed. It is not possible to accept the excuses, provided by the regime, of the clear breach to the rights of the citizens and his excuses are based on the claims that they were chasing two hundred people who had, according to the regime’s claims, deviated the regime and breached the law. It is not possible to justify massacres and mass destruction to the buildings including mosques, churches and historic places for alleged security reasons. In fact, the authorities became involved in a wide range of breaches and wild practices and killing, which are considered as ‘crimes of genocide. Syria has never witnessed anything similar to them, even during the resistance against the French colonalisation in the first half of the 20th century."

SHRC.org | Massacre of Hama (February 1982) Genocide and A crime against Humanity| 2005 Reports

Got it? Hafez Assad massacred an estimated 40,000 people, all Sunni, and now the son, Bashar Assad, is slaughtering Sunni indiscriminately, falsely claiming they are all Islamists.

Al-Qaeda Propaganda.

 

[Bleipriester]

Out of thousands of sorties, one plane was hit and it was due to pilot error. Russia has never built an air defense system Israel could not defeat, including the latest ones.

The pilot error was entering Syrian airspace.

"In the tension between completing the task and defending the survival, the professional team made a mistake that did not protect itself as required. His actions did not match the order of priorities required by the missile threat he was in."
Stunning: How the IDF paraphrases "F-16 was shot down"

No, your post shows the pilot failed to take the defensive measures he was taught to take in that situation. Face it, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria.

When it isn´t Iran or Hezbollah it is a shell or missile that ended up in the occupied Golan. The Zionists need to calm down.

Ok, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria and to stop firing shells and missiles into Israel.

Terrorists used to fire at there to call in Israeli air strikes. Israel holds Damascus responsible regardless of who actually fired the objects. At least we can assume that they acknowledge Assad and the whole Syrian government, right? When will they start to calm down?

Assad: Syria to Recognize Israel if Real Peace Offered

 

[toomuchtime_]

RE: Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end
⁜→ Bleipriester, et al,

BLUF: If you hadn't guessed, I support the forces operating against the Assad Regime and the Islamic State.

This is all about political choice and foreign policy...

In general, I don't support any discretionary Political-Military (POL-MIL) engagements anywhere in the Middle East Region; from the narrow Strait of Hormuz - westward - to the Mediterranean Sea.

I support the American position on the issue of regional Humanitarian aid. America is one of the larger humanitarian donor nations forces operating against the Assad Leadership in Syria (≈ $8 Billion and growing) providing assistance for displaced people inside Syria and the immediate surrounding region.

(COMMENT)

I see Humanitarian Assistance as separate and distinct from POL-MIL diplomatic and military communications and direct engagements. In that regard, in the authoritarian and military-dominated regime of the Syrian Arab Republic. But I do not think that the US presence or the Israeli air options are going to make a difference in regards to the outlaw Assad Regime. The intractable civil war in Syria opposes the Assad Regime and I'm all for that. But I think that the Syrians should carry the heavy weight.

And I see the third facet as the Iranian connection in the illicit transfer, destabilizing accumulation and misuse of small arms and light weapons (SALW) to hot areas both in Lebanon and Syria (with the intermediate stop in Iraq). It appears that Israel has taken out stockpiles in both Lebanon and Syria. Iran supports Assad and then by extension drags Lebanon and Hezbollah with it. So any strike Israel makes against the Iranians is, by extension, a strike against the Assad Regime. Any anti-Israeli position taken to the strikes is liking it or not, an expression of support for the Assad Regime.


Most Respectfully,
R

But you are in support of the unsupportable. You charge the "Assad regime" but what about those who are fighting it? They were all allies. They are all islamist terrorists.

Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia

No, they are not. There are some Islamic terrorists among Assad's enemies, but keep in mind the Civil war, which has now become a regional sectarian war, began when Assad ordered the massacre of thousands of Sunni, just as his father had done years before, who were peacefully protesting economic conditions due to the encroaching desert, and the original anti Assad force was made up of Syrian soldiers who defected from the Army in protest against this atrocity.

1982 Hama "massacre":
"Islamist insurgency in Syria suppressed, decisive Syrian Army victory"

"The events of the Hama massacre began at 2 am on 3 February 1982. An army unit searching the old city "stumbled on the hideout of the local guerilla commander, Omar Jawwad (aka Abu Bakr) and were ambushed. Other insurgent cells were alerted by radio and "roof-top snipers killed perhaps a score" of Syrian soldiers. Reinforcements were rushed to besiege Abu Bakr who then "gave the order for a general uprising" in Hama. Mosque loudspeakers used for the call to prayer called for jihad against the Ba'ath, and hundreds of Islamic insurgents rose to attack the homes of government officials and Baath Party leaders, overrun police posts and ransack armories. By daybreak of the morning of 3 February some 70 leading Ba'athists had been killed and the Islamist insurgents and other opposition activists proclaimed Hama a "liberated city", urging Syrians to rise up against the "infidel"."
1982 Hama massacre - Wikipedia

Got it?

"Preceding the massacre the regime started to provoke practises against the citizens by killing, arresting, bombing houses and abusing the children, women and elderly this was the spark, which lead to the ignition of the bloodshed. It is not possible to accept the excuses, provided by the regime, of the clear breach to the rights of the citizens and his excuses are based on the claims that they were chasing two hundred people who had, according to the regime’s claims, deviated the regime and breached the law. It is not possible to justify massacres and mass destruction to the buildings including mosques, churches and historic places for alleged security reasons. In fact, the authorities became involved in a wide range of breaches and wild practices and killing, which are considered as ‘crimes of genocide. Syria has never witnessed anything similar to them, even during the resistance against the French colonalisation in the first half of the 20th century."

SHRC.org | Massacre of Hama (February 1982) Genocide and A crime against Humanity| 2005 Reports

Got it? Hafez Assad massacred an estimated 40,000 people, all Sunni, and now the son, Bashar Assad, is slaughtering Sunni indiscriminately, falsely claiming they are all Islamists.

Al-Qaeda Propaganda.

Right, every time Assad murders a Sunni, he calls him al Qaeda or ISIS.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Out of thousands of sorties, one plane was hit and it was due to pilot error. Russia has never built an air defense system Israel could not defeat, including the latest ones.

The pilot error was entering Syrian airspace.

"In the tension between completing the task and defending the survival, the professional team made a mistake that did not protect itself as required. His actions did not match the order of priorities required by the missile threat he was in."
Stunning: How the IDF paraphrases "F-16 was shot down"

No, your post shows the pilot failed to take the defensive measures he was taught to take in that situation. Face it, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria.

When it isn´t Iran or Hezbollah it is a shell or missile that ended up in the occupied Golan. The Zionists need to calm down.

Ok, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria and to stop firing shells and missiles into Israel.

Terrorists used to fire at there to call in Israeli air strikes. Israel holds Damascus responsible regardless of who actually fired the objects. At least we can assume that they acknowledge Assad and the whole Syrian government, right? When will they start to calm down?

Assad: Syria to Recognize Israel if Real Peace Offered

More bullshit. When a rocket or shell lands in Israel, Israel returns fire to the location that fired it. Israeli airstrikes a strategic, aimed at keeping Iran and Hezbollah from establishing positions in Syria that threaten Israel. Sharon and Netanyahu both offered Assad peace and the return of Golan but insisted Syria not allow Iran or Hezbollah be allowed to use Syrian territory against Israel, and Assad refused.

 

[Bleipriester]

The pilot error was entering Syrian airspace.

"In the tension between completing the task and defending the survival, the professional team made a mistake that did not protect itself as required. His actions did not match the order of priorities required by the missile threat he was in."
Stunning: How the IDF paraphrases "F-16 was shot down"

No, your post shows the pilot failed to take the defensive measures he was taught to take in that situation. Face it, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria.

When it isn´t Iran or Hezbollah it is a shell or missile that ended up in the occupied Golan. The Zionists need to calm down.

Ok, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria and to stop firing shells and missiles into Israel.

Terrorists used to fire at there to call in Israeli air strikes. Israel holds Damascus responsible regardless of who actually fired the objects. At least we can assume that they acknowledge Assad and the whole Syrian government, right? When will they start to calm down?

Assad: Syria to Recognize Israel if Real Peace Offered

More bullshit. When a rocket or shell lands in Israel, Israel returns fire to the location that fired it. Israeli airstrikes a strategic, aimed at keeping Iran and Hezbollah from establishing positions in Syria that threaten Israel. Sharon and Netanyahu both offered Assad peace and the return of Golan but insisted Syria not allow Iran or Hezbollah be allowed to use Syrian territory against Israel, and Assad refused.

Sorry but I guess that somebody who unwittingly cites terrorist propaganda doesn´t know about Israel´s rules of engagement, given that the trajectory is known.

Israel Holds Syrian Government Responsible for Any Breaches of Country's Borders

 

[Bleipriester]

But you are in support of the unsupportable. You charge the "Assad regime" but what about those who are fighting it? They were all allies. They are all islamist terrorists.

Battle of Raqqa (March 2013) - Wikipedia

No, they are not. There are some Islamic terrorists among Assad's enemies, but keep in mind the Civil war, which has now become a regional sectarian war, began when Assad ordered the massacre of thousands of Sunni, just as his father had done years before, who were peacefully protesting economic conditions due to the encroaching desert, and the original anti Assad force was made up of Syrian soldiers who defected from the Army in protest against this atrocity.

1982 Hama "massacre":
"Islamist insurgency in Syria suppressed, decisive Syrian Army victory"

"The events of the Hama massacre began at 2 am on 3 February 1982. An army unit searching the old city "stumbled on the hideout of the local guerilla commander, Omar Jawwad (aka Abu Bakr) and were ambushed. Other insurgent cells were alerted by radio and "roof-top snipers killed perhaps a score" of Syrian soldiers. Reinforcements were rushed to besiege Abu Bakr who then "gave the order for a general uprising" in Hama. Mosque loudspeakers used for the call to prayer called for jihad against the Ba'ath, and hundreds of Islamic insurgents rose to attack the homes of government officials and Baath Party leaders, overrun police posts and ransack armories. By daybreak of the morning of 3 February some 70 leading Ba'athists had been killed and the Islamist insurgents and other opposition activists proclaimed Hama a "liberated city", urging Syrians to rise up against the "infidel"."
1982 Hama massacre - Wikipedia

Got it?

"Preceding the massacre the regime started to provoke practises against the citizens by killing, arresting, bombing houses and abusing the children, women and elderly this was the spark, which lead to the ignition of the bloodshed. It is not possible to accept the excuses, provided by the regime, of the clear breach to the rights of the citizens and his excuses are based on the claims that they were chasing two hundred people who had, according to the regime’s claims, deviated the regime and breached the law. It is not possible to justify massacres and mass destruction to the buildings including mosques, churches and historic places for alleged security reasons. In fact, the authorities became involved in a wide range of breaches and wild practices and killing, which are considered as ‘crimes of genocide. Syria has never witnessed anything similar to them, even during the resistance against the French colonalisation in the first half of the 20th century."

SHRC.org | Massacre of Hama (February 1982) Genocide and A crime against Humanity| 2005 Reports

Got it? Hafez Assad massacred an estimated 40,000 people, all Sunni, and now the son, Bashar Assad, is slaughtering Sunni indiscriminately, falsely claiming they are all Islamists.

Al-Qaeda Propaganda.

Right, every time Assad murders a Sunni, he calls him al Qaeda or ISIS.

Almost funny how many Americans are suddenly so sensitive when it comes to Islamists

 

[Mindful]

No, your post shows the pilot failed to take the defensive measures he was taught to take in that situation. Face it, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria.

When it isn´t Iran or Hezbollah it is a shell or missile that ended up in the occupied Golan. The Zionists need to calm down.

Ok, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria and to stop firing shells and missiles into Israel.

Terrorists used to fire at there to call in Israeli air strikes. Israel holds Damascus responsible regardless of who actually fired the objects. At least we can assume that they acknowledge Assad and the whole Syrian government, right? When will they start to calm down?

Assad: Syria to Recognize Israel if Real Peace Offered

More bullshit. When a rocket or shell lands in Israel, Israel returns fire to the location that fired it. Israeli airstrikes a strategic, aimed at keeping Iran and Hezbollah from establishing positions in Syria that threaten Israel. Sharon and Netanyahu both offered Assad peace and the return of Golan but insisted Syria not allow Iran or Hezbollah be allowed to use Syrian territory against Israel, and Assad refused.

Sorry but I guess that somebody who unwittingly cites terrorist propaganda doesn´t know about Israel´s rules of engagement, given that the trajectory is known.

Israel Holds Syrian Government Responsible for Any Breaches of Country's Borders

Yeah, the trajectory of the tunnels leading from the Hezbollah terrorist enclave of southern Lebanon.

 

[Mindful]

You don't think that's funny atall, Bleipriester.

 

[toomuchtime_]

No, your post shows the pilot failed to take the defensive measures he was taught to take in that situation. Face it, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria.

When it isn´t Iran or Hezbollah it is a shell or missile that ended up in the occupied Golan. The Zionists need to calm down.

Ok, the only way Assad can end the Israeli strikes is to kick Iran and Hezbollah out of Syria and to stop firing shells and missiles into Israel.

Terrorists used to fire at there to call in Israeli air strikes. Israel holds Damascus responsible regardless of who actually fired the objects. At least we can assume that they acknowledge Assad and the whole Syrian government, right? When will they start to calm down?

Assad: Syria to Recognize Israel if Real Peace Offered

More bullshit. When a rocket or shell lands in Israel, Israel returns fire to the location that fired it. Israeli airstrikes a strategic, aimed at keeping Iran and Hezbollah from establishing positions in Syria that threaten Israel. Sharon and Netanyahu both offered Assad peace and the return of Golan but insisted Syria not allow Iran or Hezbollah be allowed to use Syrian territory against Israel, and Assad refused.

Sorry but I guess that somebody who unwittingly cites terrorist propaganda doesn´t know about Israel´s rules of engagement, given that the trajectory is known.

Israel Holds Syrian Government Responsible for Any Breaches of Country's Borders

lol You can cry terrorist all you want, but anyone who has been following the action knows Israel only fires on the location that launched the shell or rocket into Israel. Syria is engaged in a regional sectarian war between Shia and Sunni and calling everyone who is opposed to Assad's sectarian war doesn't fool anyone.

 

[toomuchtime_]

No, they are not. There are some Islamic terrorists among Assad's enemies, but keep in mind the Civil war, which has now become a regional sectarian war, began when Assad ordered the massacre of thousands of Sunni, just as his father had done years before, who were peacefully protesting economic conditions due to the encroaching desert, and the original anti Assad force was made up of Syrian soldiers who defected from the Army in protest against this atrocity.

1982 Hama "massacre":
"Islamist insurgency in Syria suppressed, decisive Syrian Army victory"

"The events of the Hama massacre began at 2 am on 3 February 1982. An army unit searching the old city "stumbled on the hideout of the local guerilla commander, Omar Jawwad (aka Abu Bakr) and were ambushed. Other insurgent cells were alerted by radio and "roof-top snipers killed perhaps a score" of Syrian soldiers. Reinforcements were rushed to besiege Abu Bakr who then "gave the order for a general uprising" in Hama. Mosque loudspeakers used for the call to prayer called for jihad against the Ba'ath, and hundreds of Islamic insurgents rose to attack the homes of government officials and Baath Party leaders, overrun police posts and ransack armories. By daybreak of the morning of 3 February some 70 leading Ba'athists had been killed and the Islamist insurgents and other opposition activists proclaimed Hama a "liberated city", urging Syrians to rise up against the "infidel"."
1982 Hama massacre - Wikipedia

Got it?

"Preceding the massacre the regime started to provoke practises against the citizens by killing, arresting, bombing houses and abusing the children, women and elderly this was the spark, which lead to the ignition of the bloodshed. It is not possible to accept the excuses, provided by the regime, of the clear breach to the rights of the citizens and his excuses are based on the claims that they were chasing two hundred people who had, according to the regime’s claims, deviated the regime and breached the law. It is not possible to justify massacres and mass destruction to the buildings including mosques, churches and historic places for alleged security reasons. In fact, the authorities became involved in a wide range of breaches and wild practices and killing, which are considered as ‘crimes of genocide. Syria has never witnessed anything similar to them, even during the resistance against the French colonalisation in the first half of the 20th century."

SHRC.org | Massacre of Hama (February 1982) Genocide and A crime against Humanity| 2005 Reports

Got it? Hafez Assad massacred an estimated 40,000 people, all Sunni, and now the son, Bashar Assad, is slaughtering Sunni indiscriminately, falsely claiming they are all Islamists.

Al-Qaeda Propaganda.

Right, every time Assad murders a Sunni, he calls him al Qaeda or ISIS.

Almost funny how many Americans are suddenly so sensitive when it comes to Islamists

It only seems funny to you because you don't understand what the word, Islamist, means.

 

[RoccoR]

qually RE: Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end
⁜→ Bleipriester, et al,

BLUF: As long as there are the "Arabs of the Kind" that actually irrationally behave in the manner as they have for the last 15 Centuries, the ever more difficult it will be for dissimilar cultures to establish any kind of meaning peace for any duration.

______________________________________
​

(•∑•)

Many have put forth the postulate that:

◈ IF America has any, any at all, commercial, industrial, economic/financial or diplomatic/security interests in the Arab or Islamic world, THEN there will be conflict and strife.

◈ IF not with America, THEN through proxies like Israel; → for one reason or another.​

But you are in support of the unsupportable. You charge the "Assad regime" but what about those who are fighting it? They were all allies. They are all Islamist terrorists.

(COMMENT)

No matter how logical your argument is, there will significant blocks of time wherein that history of the Arab Islamic World (and significant pre-Islamic history) will have been in conflict (of one kind or another). There is no reason to believe that any decision that American ( → or its allies in the Middle East → or those greater Afro-Political allied with America) could possibly make that would not be held responsible for one or more conflicts.

So, even if you judge today, that the decisions of America (or political-military determinations) are impossible, does not mean that there was any alternative path that would not be criticized for its outcome.

There is one thing to fully understand, is that no Israeli Airstrike intentionally:

◈ Initiated inhumane acts of a character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health to non-combatants.
​

Nor, have any program, plan or campaign have, as an objective or mission, to:

◈ Intentionally conduct operations against any "civilian population" in the furtherance of an Israeli policy to commit such attack;

◈ Intentionally inflict the deprivation or access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population, culture or ethnic portion of the population.
​

However unfortunate, a reality of war dictates that the intentional use of a "civilian population" by hostile Arab or radical Islamic elements to mask, shield or conceal in an attempt to render immune from military neutralization is inevitable.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Bleipriester]

You don't think that's funny atall, Bleipriester.

War isn´t but your comment somehow.

 

[Bleipriester]

qually RE: Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end
⁜→ Bleipriester, et al,

BLUF: As long as there are the "Arabs of the Kind" that actually irrationally behave in the manner as they have for the last 15 Centuries, the ever more difficult it will be for dissimilar cultures to establish any kind of meaning peace for any duration.

______________________________________
​

(•∑•)

Many have put forth the postulate that:

◈ IF America has any, any at all, commercial, industrial, economic/financial or diplomatic/security interests in the Arab or Islamic world, THEN there will be conflict and strife.

◈ IF not with America, THEN through proxies like Israel; → for one reason or another.​

But you are in support of the unsupportable. You charge the "Assad regime" but what about those who are fighting it? They were all allies. They are all Islamist terrorists.

(COMMENT)

No matter how logical your argument is, there will significant blocks of time wherein that history of the Arab Islamic World (and significant pre-Islamic history) will have been in conflict (of one kind or another). There is no reason to believe that any decision that American ( → or its allies in the Middle East → or those greater Afro-Political allied with America) could possibly make that would not be held responsible for one or more conflicts.

So, even if you judge today, that the decisions of America (or political-military determinations) are impossible, does not mean that there was any alternative path that would not be criticized for its outcome.

There is one thing to fully understand, is that no Israeli Airstrike intentionally:

◈ Initiated inhumane acts of a character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health to non-combatants.
​

Nor, have any program, plan or campaign have, as an objective or mission, to:

◈ Intentionally conduct operations against any "civilian population" in the furtherance of an Israeli policy to commit such attack;

◈ Intentionally inflict the deprivation or access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population, culture or ethnic portion of the population.
​

However unfortunate, a reality of war dictates that the intentional use of a "civilian population" by hostile Arab or radical Islamic elements to mask, shield or conceal in an attempt to render immune from military neutralization is inevitable.

Most Respectfully,
R

I don´t see Israel intentionally causing civilian casualties or suffering with attacks on Syria but when it is about Gaza, things are different. However, all I have to add to the Palestine thing is that Israel´s policy should be about destroying Hamas to end the bullshit there.
The support and using of terrorists in Syria on the other hand fully meets this terms.

What anti-Americans claim regardless of the US´s actual actions is not the topic here but solely the actual actions, which are described here: The Redirection
There is no sufficient explanation or justification for this policy.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end
⁜→ Bleipriester, et al,

Interesting...

...
The support and using of terrorists in Syria on the other hand fully meets this terms.
...
There is no sufficient explanation or justification for this policy.

(COMMENT)

I don't understand this at all.

Excluding the fact the region is simply crawling with "White," → "Black," and → "Gray" overt and covert operations both national and multinational in flavor. And excluding the fact that:

​

Three of the nations mentioned are FVEY. The overall territory is the old stomping grounds of the DGSE. Five of the countries are members of the Arab League (each with ties to multiple terrorist organizations - directly or indirectly). The region is just permeated with SVR and GRU; not to mention IRGC-QF → involved in the distribution of various weapons and intelligence.

To suggest that there is something unique about "terrorist connects" with any nation operating in the region is simply unremarkable. Such connections are like breathing air and virtually meaningless.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Bleipriester]

RE: Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end
⁜→ Bleipriester, et al,

Interesting...

...
The support and using of terrorists in Syria on the other hand fully meets this terms.
...
There is no sufficient explanation or justification for this policy.

(COMMENT)

I don't understand this at all.

Excluding the fact the region is simply crawling with "White," → "Black," and → "Gray" overt and covert operations both national and multinational in flavor. And excluding the fact that:

View attachment 240046
​

Three of the nations mentioned are FVEY. The overall territory is the old stomping grounds of the DGSE. Five of the countries are members of the Arab League (each with ties to multiple terrorist organizations - directly or indirectly). The region is just permeated with SVR and GRU; not to mention IRGC-QF → involved in the distribution of various weapons and intelligence.

To suggest that there is something unique about "terrorist connects" with any nation operating in the region is simply unremarkable. Such connections are like breathing air and virtually meaningless.

Most Respectfully,
R

Others do it so we can do it is not a good justification.

"In October 2013 the Israeli occupied Golan and Sheeba Farms were used to infiltrate some 40,000 Jabhat al-Nusrah and Liwa-al-Islam fighters / mercenaries into Lebanon and the opening of a new, major battlefront in the Qalamoun region at the Lebanese – Syrian border."
https://nsnbc.me/2015/01/29/hezbollah-israel-clash-israeli-occupied-sheeba-farms/
(source currently not available)

All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Israel´s terror attacks on Syria are going to end
⁜→ Bleipriester, et al,

Others do it so we can do it is not a good justification.

"In October 2013 the Israeli occupied Golan and Sheeba Farms were used to infiltrate some 40,000 Jabhat al-Nusrah and Liwa-al-Islam fighters / mercenaries into Lebanon and the opening of a new, major battlefront in the Qalamoun region at the Lebanese – Syrian border."
https://nsnbc.me/2015/01/29/hezbollah-israel-clash-israeli-occupied-sheeba-farms/
(source currently not available)

All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

(COMMENT)

Nonsense... That is not the reasoning at all.

First, because there are so many activities and organizations involved, you cannot be certain as to what action by whatever agency, resulted in any one outcome.

Second, for more than two millennium, governments have been doing the same things --- establishing a "customary process."

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[rylah]

Bibi will whine and cry. Dissembling talks of "self defense" will not convince Syrian air defense missiles.

So called "Syrian" air defense systems were mostly relieved of their Syrian operators for low IQ and total in-professionalism. Especially after the downing of the Russian civilian jet.
If You actually look close into the ground footage of the attacks You see Syrian operatives pee outside while Israelis destroy the unemployed Russian systems - it's the cold war equation.

With that said the timing of the IDF general ending his command and the elections, should not be overlooked as key factors of the next few months developments.

Though I think the war has turned to different lane, and this attack was merely a show of commitment to an established red line.

You and I, and the Syrians, Iranians, Russians, Americans, the French and the Egyptians - we all know this uncompromising position, merely been notified and updated by the new and old generals.

 

[Bleipriester]

So called "Syrian" air defense systems were mostly relieved of their Syrian operators for low IQ and total in-professionalism. Especially after the downing of the Russian civilian jet.

Hiding behind civilian or other aviation is an intention to misdirect the automatic missile into it. It is only an evidence for the low human standards of the IAF.

If You actually look close into the ground footage of the attacks You see Syrian operatives pee outside while Israelis destroy the unemployed Russian systems - it's the cold war equation.

If true, pee happens.

With that said the timing of the IDF general ending his command and the elections, should not be overlooked as key factors of the next few months developments.

Though I think the war has turned to different lane, and this attack was merely a show of commitment to an established red line.

You and I, and the Syrians, Iranians, Russians, Americans, the French and the Egyptians - we all know this uncompromising position, merely been notified and updated by the new and old generals.

?

 

[Bleipriester]

More Israeli missiles intercepted.