The Israeli parliament isn't based on quotas. Then they need to win more seats.
Of course it's not based on quotas, but when there is such a large descrepency - then raises the question of "why" and the answer "they need to win more seats" is disengenius.
It also makes it look more like "token" positions than anything else.
Because Israeli Palestinians routinely boycott the elections.
It only looks like that to you because you're a moron of the first order.
While Arab voter turnout has been on a decline,
it was 54.3 % in the 2009 election - a boycott doesn't explain it all. Interesting article.
Only 65% of all Israeli's voted in 2009.
Double whammy: the election commissions attempt to disqualify both Arab parties.
1955 Knesset had 90% Arab voter participation. Only two Arab party seats were won with another two from a Jewish-Arab cooperative party.
1969 a steady decliine to 80% - no Arab party won seats, though there were several "cooperative" parties won 4 seats.
Arab voter turnout continued to decline then jumped up again to 77% in 1996 (overall voter turnout was 79%) - only one Arab party, 4 seats.
1999 - Arab List party won 5 seats with something like 75% arab voter turn out.
2003 62% (2001 was 18% - a boycott) - Arab party won 2 seats.
2006 total voter turnout was lowest ever at 63.2%, Arab voter turnout was 56.3% United Arab List-Taal won 3 seats.
So it would seem regardless of voter turnout - they've never won more than 5 seats (and that was in a year with only 75%) turn out. In a number of the years - Arab voter turnout was not significantly different from overall voter turn out and the years when they were highest saw only 2-4 seats gained.
I'm not sure - other than 2001 (which was strictly for prime minister) - how much of a boycott there was and whether it made any difference anyway.