JoeB131
Diamond Member
Actually, for every person they've killed, they've probably created two terrorists.Hamas will not launch such a barbaric ever again. As you know, leaving them alive and we do this again in a few years, and then again.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Actually, for every person they've killed, they've probably created two terrorists.Hamas will not launch such a barbaric ever again. As you know, leaving them alive and we do this again in a few years, and then again.
Nazis thought Jews were subhuman, just as you think the same of Muslims.You got it backwards. That’s what the Muslim savages were shouting as they sawed off baby heads and set toddlers on fire.
The Muslim savages who sawed off baby heads and set little kids on fire ARE subhuman. There is no comparison to Jews in Germany who were simply working and raising a family - and harming no one,Nazis thought Jews were subhuman, just as you think the same of Muslims.
You aren’t smart enough to recognize the enormous hypocrisy. Hatred and racism makes one ignorant.
The Muslim savages who sawed off baby heads and set little kids on fire ARE subhuman. There is no comparison to Jews in Germany who were simply working and raising a family - and harming no one,
But you know that.
Stop using CHILDREN as combatants in war. I can't believe you are justifying this as acceptable.Kill those kids! Yippee!
He just enjoys slandering Jews. We probably shouldn’t indulge him, but it’s hard to let the blood libel continue without an objection. That is how antisemites were able to turn people against Jews, beginning in 12th century England, and as you can see, continuing to this day.Stop using CHILDREN as combatants in war. I can't believe you are justifying this as acceptable.
Stop using CHILDREN as combatants in war. I can't believe you are justifying this as acceptable.
The HAMAS savages just needed to return the hostages and surrender. Too bad their wish to have the world turn against Israel is more important than the lives of their own people.
But this illuminates the problem, does it not? What you mean when you describe the territory as "no man's land" is that you are expecting (hoping for) a peanut butter and jelly sandwich when there is no peanut butter, no jelly, and no bread.
Israel isn't trying to prevent a power vacuum. Literally, what Israel NEEDs to do is create that power vacuum (because the power in question is abhorrent, and destructively evil, and harmful to both Israel and Gaza citizens). The question on the table is WHO is going to step up to fill that vacuum. If your answer is: "Hamas, other militant groups or warlords", it only demonstrates the lack of capacity for the people of Gaza (Palestine) to create a functioning nation.
The problem is not with the "recognition", but the will and the capacity and the actualization of the people of Gaza (or "Palestine") to step up to fill that vacuum. If the people of Gaza are not capable of filing that vacuum (and they are most clearly NOT, so very NOT), then there is no point in calling for them to fill in the vacuum with vague political hand-waving of "recognition". Accept reality.
There is no existing state prepared to accomodate this desire, hasn’t been for years.Why are we still talking about the conditions? The conditions are easy and not especially under dispute. Are they? So, let's square this circle. A people seeks self-determination. An existing State is prepared to accommodate this desire. What are the conditions that must be performed by the accommodating State to satisfy the requirement "to leave and then actually leaving"?
That is a dishonest portrayal of what the Russians have done in Ukraine. What did they do to Mariupol…Bakhmet…tons of other Ukrainian towns?
They have never cared about their own people.The HAMAS savages just needed to return the hostages and surrender. Too bad their wish to have the world turn against Israel is more important than the lives of their own people.
They voted for Hamas to lead their government. No Israelis did anything to merit the barbaric attack.Most of the 33K people who the Zionists have killed had nothing to do with the 10-7 attacks. The 14,000 children certainly didn't.
Yet the world is turning against Israel.The HAMAS savages just needed to return the hostages and surrender. Too bad their wish to have the world turn against Israel is more important than the lives of their own people.
No, it's not. People are just upset about the war.Yet the world is turning against Israel.
I'll have a more thorough response, but for now ...That is an extremely dangerous game to play don’t you think?
THAT is the million dollar question, isn't it? (Thugs and militias and warring factions for power are just temporary.)...there has been a complete breakdown of any governance, law, etc. What is stepping to fill that?
Well, if the people of Gaza (and Palestine) are not capable of creating a functioning, independent nation with international support, and trillions of dollars of aide, and economic trade with Israel...It isn’t about the lack of capacity to create a functioning nation, it’s about giving them a reasonable chance and not creating yet another failed state ...
Hard disagree. Easy. The parameters were: "to leave and then actually leaving":The conditions are not easy.
Much of the destruction in those towns was caused by both sides, not just Russia.That is a dishonest portrayal of what the Russians have done in Ukraine. What did they do to Mariupol…Bakhmet…tons of other Ukrainian towns?
The majority of Americans are still on Israel’s side, especially when you factor out the young, ignorant, gullible people in their 20s.No, it's not. People are just upset about the war.