Islam's racism against Blacks

[Asclepias]

Adam & Eve were white. Therefore, God was white. Thread closed.

The Big Guy's race wouldn't matter to me, but I'll bet He married a White woman haha.



-

Well isn't that the first thing that blacks do when they become famous or rich? Find themselves a nice piece of white ass. Ha ha ha.

You dont have to find a nice piece of white ass. Typically it hunts you down if you are a Black male and can walk and chew bubble gum at the same time.

Bzzzzz wrong. You are again avoiding the inconvenient truth.

Yes an inconvient truth.

 

[Asclepias]

Adam & Eve were white. Therefore, God was white. Thread closed.

Adman and Eve were Black. Therefore god is Black. Thread reopened.

How about you take your Afrocentrism bullshit to one of these black racist boards?

The ideology of black supremacy, of course, is the mirror image of white supremacy. While different groups put their own spin on things, black supremacy often involves the racialist pseudoscience called "melanin theory" and the pseudohistory called "Afrocentrism". The basic idea behind melanin theory is that black is the "natural" skin color because humans originated in Africa, so lighter skin tones are aberrations. Various melanin theorists build on top of this, positing all sorts of biologically unsupportable claims about melanin increasing muscle tone, brain activity, physical ability, etc. Some theories get into really batshit territory, claiming that melanin can grant paranormal powers like ESP.

Afrocentrism and melanin theory often cross-pollinate, but Afrocentrism as a separate concept has a historical rather than biological focus. It's important to separate legitimate historical revisionism from the kind Afrocentrists engage in. The early histories and ethnographies of African cultures were written largely by European historians and anthropologists from an imperialist perspective. Thus, these works are often skewed by racism and filled with factual inaccuracies, and are outdated due to new findings in archaeological and historical scholarship. There have been many revisionist works throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that attempt to look at this history from an African perspective, but remain factual. This is simply an attempt to "correct the record." Afrocentrism, on the other hand, engages in distortion and fabrications of its own. One of the central claims of Afrocentrists is that Egypt was ruled by a black race. They use this to claim that Greco-Roman civilization, and by extension, Western civilization, is actually based on black culture. Working from this point, they rewrite many historical figures like Socrates as having been black and shoehorn various events into the ideology. When called on their bullshit, they tend to justify their factual inaccuracies by claiming that critics are using a Eurocentric methodology that is unable to ascertain a true understanding of history and that only those using the Afrocentric methodology can do so. And just for the record, Ramesses II was a ginger.[1]

Similar crank claims point toward India (implying that the existence of the "Negrito" people, mean that Indian culture comes from black Africans, and the Dravidians are so dark that they must be Africans), China (depictions of people in dark materials, imply they were black, for example, Terracota Army), Japaneses (Jomons would have been black, and so did the Ainu, as they used black bronze in their sculptures, and were painted in light-brown, which is clearly white washing from the Japaneses bigots) and the Mongols ("black khans"), in America, rewriting Central America, Aztecs, Mayas, and particularly, the Olmecs, since they had wide noses in their statues, something that maya-quiché completely lack nowdays, no matter the look of Rigoberta Menchú[2].

Oddly, some black supremacist groups have formed friendly relations with white supremacist groups. Part of it may be that both ideologies tend to promote anti-Semitism and homophobia. The other part is that both are extreme nationalists, and have the (ostensible) end goal of a series of seperate states for each "race". Thus if White Nationalists want to move all the white people to, say, Montana and kick out all the black people, and Black Nationalists want to move all the black people to, say, not-Montana and kick out the white people, they both have the same goal. Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam invited the neo-Nazi Tom Metzger to NOI meetings. Metzger remarked:

“”They speak out against the Jews and the oppressors in Washington. . . . They are the black counterpart to us.[3]
Support for racial separatism also tends to unite both ideologies.
The black supremacist sect that probably most promotes anti-Semitism ironically identifies as "Black Hebrew Israelites."[4] This ideology has its roots in post-bellum Pentecostalism, which transmuted into "Black Judaism." According to Black Judaism and Black Hebrew Israelism, the newly freed slaves of America's South were the true Hebrews and descendants of the tribes of Israel (an assertion that mirrors the Christian Identity theology held by some white supremacists, which claims Aryans as the true Hebrew race). F.S. Cherry, a late 19th century proponent of Black Judaism's more hateful elements, also preached about a race war with apocalyptic overtones that would supposedly occur in the year 2000 and refashion society into one where blacks were the superior race. The belief that blacks are the "true" Hebrews also leads many in the Black Hebrew Israelite movement to espouse anti-Semitic pseudohistory such as the Khazar myth and Holocaust denial.[5]

How about you go blow yourself then try to make me?

 

[Roudy]

^^^^^^^
Dream on.

 

[Asclepias]

^^^^^^^
Dream on.

You must be dreaming. I am still here posting. How is it going getting me to post somewhere else?

 

[Roudy]

Adam & Eve were white. Therefore, God was white. Thread closed.

Adman and Eve were Black. Therefore god is Black. Thread reopened.

How about you take your Afrocentrism bullshit to one of these black racist boards?

The ideology of black supremacy, of course, is the mirror image of white supremacy. While different groups put their own spin on things, black supremacy often involves the racialist pseudoscience called "melanin theory" and the pseudohistory called "Afrocentrism". The basic idea behind melanin theory is that black is the "natural" skin color because humans originated in Africa, so lighter skin tones are aberrations. Various melanin theorists build on top of this, positing all sorts of biologically unsupportable claims about melanin increasing muscle tone, brain activity, physical ability, etc. Some theories get into really batshit territory, claiming that melanin can grant paranormal powers like ESP.

Afrocentrism and melanin theory often cross-pollinate, but Afrocentrism as a separate concept has a historical rather than biological focus. It's important to separate legitimate historical revisionism from the kind Afrocentrists engage in. The early histories and ethnographies of African cultures were written largely by European historians and anthropologists from an imperialist perspective. Thus, these works are often skewed by racism and filled with factual inaccuracies, and are outdated due to new findings in archaeological and historical scholarship. There have been many revisionist works throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that attempt to look at this history from an African perspective, but remain factual. This is simply an attempt to "correct the record." Afrocentrism, on the other hand, engages in distortion and fabrications of its own. One of the central claims of Afrocentrists is that Egypt was ruled by a black race. They use this to claim that Greco-Roman civilization, and by extension, Western civilization, is actually based on black culture. Working from this point, they rewrite many historical figures like Socrates as having been black and shoehorn various events into the ideology. When called on their bullshit, they tend to justify their factual inaccuracies by claiming that critics are using a Eurocentric methodology that is unable to ascertain a true understanding of history and that only those using the Afrocentric methodology can do so. And just for the record, Ramesses II was a ginger.[1]

Similar crank claims point toward India (implying that the existence of the "Negrito" people, mean that Indian culture comes from black Africans, and the Dravidians are so dark that they must be Africans), China (depictions of people in dark materials, imply they were black, for example, Terracota Army), Japaneses (Jomons would have been black, and so did the Ainu, as they used black bronze in their sculptures, and were painted in light-brown, which is clearly white washing from the Japaneses bigots) and the Mongols ("black khans"), in America, rewriting Central America, Aztecs, Mayas, and particularly, the Olmecs, since they had wide noses in their statues, something that maya-quiché completely lack nowdays, no matter the look of Rigoberta Menchú[2].

Oddly, some black supremacist groups have formed friendly relations with white supremacist groups. Part of it may be that both ideologies tend to promote anti-Semitism and homophobia. The other part is that both are extreme nationalists, and have the (ostensible) end goal of a series of seperate states for each "race". Thus if White Nationalists want to move all the white people to, say, Montana and kick out all the black people, and Black Nationalists want to move all the black people to, say, not-Montana and kick out the white people, they both have the same goal. Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam invited the neo-Nazi Tom Metzger to NOI meetings. Metzger remarked:

“”They speak out against the Jews and the oppressors in Washington. . . . They are the black counterpart to us.[3]
Support for racial separatism also tends to unite both ideologies.
The black supremacist sect that probably most promotes anti-Semitism ironically identifies as "Black Hebrew Israelites."[4] This ideology has its roots in post-bellum Pentecostalism, which transmuted into "Black Judaism." According to Black Judaism and Black Hebrew Israelism, the newly freed slaves of America's South were the true Hebrews and descendants of the tribes of Israel (an assertion that mirrors the Christian Identity theology held by some white supremacists, which claims Aryans as the true Hebrew race). F.S. Cherry, a late 19th century proponent of Black Judaism's more hateful elements, also preached about a race war with apocalyptic overtones that would supposedly occur in the year 2000 and refashion society into one where blacks were the superior race. The belief that blacks are the "true" Hebrews also leads many in the Black Hebrew Israelite movement to espouse anti-Semitic pseudohistory such as the Khazar myth and Holocaust denial.[5]

How about you go blow yourself then try to make me?

I think that post describes your bullshit to the T. Tell us, is there like an Afrocentrist club or church for racist morons like you?

 

[Asclepias]

Adam & Eve were white. Therefore, God was white. Thread closed.

Adman and Eve were Black. Therefore god is Black. Thread reopened.

How about you take your Afrocentrism bullshit to one of these black racist boards?

The ideology of black supremacy, of course, is the mirror image of white supremacy. While different groups put their own spin on things, black supremacy often involves the racialist pseudoscience called "melanin theory" and the pseudohistory called "Afrocentrism". The basic idea behind melanin theory is that black is the "natural" skin color because humans originated in Africa, so lighter skin tones are aberrations. Various melanin theorists build on top of this, positing all sorts of biologically unsupportable claims about melanin increasing muscle tone, brain activity, physical ability, etc. Some theories get into really batshit territory, claiming that melanin can grant paranormal powers like ESP.

Afrocentrism and melanin theory often cross-pollinate, but Afrocentrism as a separate concept has a historical rather than biological focus. It's important to separate legitimate historical revisionism from the kind Afrocentrists engage in. The early histories and ethnographies of African cultures were written largely by European historians and anthropologists from an imperialist perspective. Thus, these works are often skewed by racism and filled with factual inaccuracies, and are outdated due to new findings in archaeological and historical scholarship. There have been many revisionist works throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that attempt to look at this history from an African perspective, but remain factual. This is simply an attempt to "correct the record." Afrocentrism, on the other hand, engages in distortion and fabrications of its own. One of the central claims of Afrocentrists is that Egypt was ruled by a black race. They use this to claim that Greco-Roman civilization, and by extension, Western civilization, is actually based on black culture. Working from this point, they rewrite many historical figures like Socrates as having been black and shoehorn various events into the ideology. When called on their bullshit, they tend to justify their factual inaccuracies by claiming that critics are using a Eurocentric methodology that is unable to ascertain a true understanding of history and that only those using the Afrocentric methodology can do so. And just for the record, Ramesses II was a ginger.[1]

Similar crank claims point toward India (implying that the existence of the "Negrito" people, mean that Indian culture comes from black Africans, and the Dravidians are so dark that they must be Africans), China (depictions of people in dark materials, imply they were black, for example, Terracota Army), Japaneses (Jomons would have been black, and so did the Ainu, as they used black bronze in their sculptures, and were painted in light-brown, which is clearly white washing from the Japaneses bigots) and the Mongols ("black khans"), in America, rewriting Central America, Aztecs, Mayas, and particularly, the Olmecs, since they had wide noses in their statues, something that maya-quiché completely lack nowdays, no matter the look of Rigoberta Menchú[2].

Oddly, some black supremacist groups have formed friendly relations with white supremacist groups. Part of it may be that both ideologies tend to promote anti-Semitism and homophobia. The other part is that both are extreme nationalists, and have the (ostensible) end goal of a series of seperate states for each "race". Thus if White Nationalists want to move all the white people to, say, Montana and kick out all the black people, and Black Nationalists want to move all the black people to, say, not-Montana and kick out the white people, they both have the same goal. Louis Farrakhan of the Nation of Islam invited the neo-Nazi Tom Metzger to NOI meetings. Metzger remarked:

“”They speak out against the Jews and the oppressors in Washington. . . . They are the black counterpart to us.[3]
Support for racial separatism also tends to unite both ideologies.
The black supremacist sect that probably most promotes anti-Semitism ironically identifies as "Black Hebrew Israelites."[4] This ideology has its roots in post-bellum Pentecostalism, which transmuted into "Black Judaism." According to Black Judaism and Black Hebrew Israelism, the newly freed slaves of America's South were the true Hebrews and descendants of the tribes of Israel (an assertion that mirrors the Christian Identity theology held by some white supremacists, which claims Aryans as the true Hebrew race). F.S. Cherry, a late 19th century proponent of Black Judaism's more hateful elements, also preached about a race war with apocalyptic overtones that would supposedly occur in the year 2000 and refashion society into one where blacks were the superior race. The belief that blacks are the "true" Hebrews also leads many in the Black Hebrew Israelite movement to espouse anti-Semitic pseudohistory such as the Khazar myth and Holocaust denial.[5]

How about you go blow yourself then try to make me?

I think that post describes your bullshit to the T. Tell us, is there like an Afrocentrist club or church for racist morons like you?

Are you more than one person now or something? Us?

 

[Roudy]

^^^^^^^
Dream on.

You must be dreaming. I am still here posting. How is it going getting me to post somewhere else?

Inconvenient truth spoken by a black man. At least he's being truthful, unlike you.

 

[Asclepias]

^^^^^^^
Dream on.

You must be dreaming. I am still here posting. How is it going getting me to post somewhere else?

Inconvenient truth spoken by a black man. At least he's being truthful, unlike you.

Inconvenient truth spoken by white girls.

 

[Roudy]

Ask A Black Man: Why Do Black Men Date Lighter/Whiter As They Gain Success?

The Hurtful “Sting” of Celebrity Men Dating White Women

By Joshua D. Copeland

Grammy Award-winning singer and actress Jill Scott rattled some cages when she spoke candidly about race relations in America.

The more Black people are being awakened, learning to love themselves and their natural beauty. Despite our learning to embrace the natural beauty within us, most of us, (Black women especially) still find it hard to be fully accepted in the U.S. In fact, many share Scott’s views on interracial relationships today, feeling they are still competing with white women for Black men.

Scott knew naturally how many would react to her interview on Essence Magazine. But she also reveals that despite what many people have and will say about her, this quiet “sting” she speaks of comes from the traumatic history of slavery in America.

“My new friend is handsome, African-American, intelligent and seemingly wealthy. He is an athlete, loves his momma, and is happily married to a white woman. I admit when I saw his wedding ring, I privately hoped. But something in me just knew he didn’t marry a sister. Although my guess hit the mark, when my friend told me his wife was indeed Caucasian, I felt my spirit wince. I didn’t immediately understand it. My face read happy for you. My body showed no reaction to my inner pinch, but the sting was there, quiet like a mosquito under a summer dress.”

Many people would argue that love is unconditional, despite race. Others say that dating a white woman keeps the unity of a Black man and woman severed. This is evident when you hear Black women call Black men sellouts, who “can’t handle” a Black woman. Or Black men, who frown upon natural hair and rule a white woman’s beauty superior when comparing her to a Black woman.

Regardless of the reason, Jill Scott argues that negative emotions triggered from the sight of interracial relationships come from a past that can only be accepted if we talk about it. After much observation, it is common for Black men who reach success to date white women.Is this an issue because of the success these Black men reach? Or is it because the woman is white?

 

[Asclepias]

Ask A Black Man: Why Do Black Men Date Lighter/Whiter As They Gain Success?

The Hurtful “Sting” of Celebrity Men Dating White Women

By Joshua D. Copeland

Grammy Award-winning singer and actress Jill Scott rattled some cages when she spoke candidly about race relations in America.

The more Black people are being awakened, learning to love themselves and their natural beauty. Despite our learning to embrace the natural beauty within us, most of us, (Black women especially) still find it hard to be fully accepted in the U.S. In fact, many share Scott’s views on interracial relationships today, feeling they are still competing with white women for Black men.

Scott knew naturally how many would react to her interview on Essence Magazine. But she also reveals that despite what many people have and will say about her, this quiet “sting” she speaks of comes from the traumatic history of slavery in America.

“My new friend is handsome, African-American, intelligent and seemingly wealthy. He is an athlete, loves his momma, and is happily married to a white woman. I admit when I saw his wedding ring, I privately hoped. But something in me just knew he didn’t marry a sister. Although my guess hit the mark, when my friend told me his wife was indeed Caucasian, I felt my spirit wince. I didn’t immediately understand it. My face read happy for you. My body showed no reaction to my inner pinch, but the sting was there, quiet like a mosquito under a summer dress.”

Many people would argue that love is unconditional, despite race. Others say that dating a white woman keeps the unity of a Black man and woman severed. This is evident when you hear Black women call Black men sellouts, who “can’t handle” a Black woman. Or Black men, who frown upon natural hair and rule a white woman’s beauty superior when comparing her to a Black woman.

Regardless of the reason, Jill Scott argues that negative emotions triggered from the sight of interracial relationships come from a past that can only be accepted if we talk about it. After much observation, it is common for Black men who reach success to date white women.Is this an issue because of the success these Black men reach? Or is it because the woman is white?

Thanks but I already read this article. What are you trying to tell me?

 

[Anonymous1977]

You've never even heard of the Gold Coast or Great Zimbabwe, have you? The Indus Valley means nothing to you, does it?

Islam's racism against Blacks is commonly known amongst some Mr. Unkotare but you may need to research it...check out Martin Lings' (a Muslim scholar) book "Muhammad" wherein he said hateful things about Blacks...



-

 

[Unkotare]

You've never even heard of the Gold Coast or Great Zimbabwe, have you? The Indus Valley means nothing to you, does it?

Islam's racism against Blacks is commonly known amongst some Mr. Unkotare but you may need to research it...check out Martin Lings' (a Muslim scholar) book "Muhammad" wherein he said hateful things about Blacks...



-

You've never even heard of the Gold Coast or Great Zimbabwe, have you? The Indus Valley means nothing to you, does it?

 

[Anonymous1977]

You wish you were Black. I understand why though.

LOLOLOLOL what your brain produces:

LOLOL.

Black but not a Negro, kid LOLOLOLOL.



-

 

[Anonymous1977]

You've never even heard of the Gold Coast or Great Zimbabwe, have you? The Indus Valley means nothing to you, does it?

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL



-