Is Tom Brady the Greatest Ever?

[ChrisL]

Shoulda, coulda, woulda, Mr. Billo. In the end, the Patriots ended with victory.

 

[rightwinger]

Did you see what Atlanta did to Seattle and Green Bay?

My point was the Pats would not have came back against a more Super Bowl experienced team.

They wouldn't have been so far behind. Atlanta ran up the score against Seattle and Green Bay and neither was able to recover

Brady had to be flawless to come back. Score on each drive, no turnovers, no major penalties, stop the clock......he was

More reason he is the GOAT

 

[Papageorgio]

It's a statement in the New York Post you putz! Bush league antics? What has Brady ever done that was "bush league"? Since his fellow players have named him one of the best players in the game every time they are polled...it's obvious that for the NFL players...the people who would know best...Tom Brady is the gold standard!

Marino was a better passer.
Montana better in the clutch.
Stabler better under 2 minutes.
Elway had a better arm.
Roman Gabriel was tougher.

Brady is just a pretty boy with a hot wife.

The best quarterback ever was Johnny Unitas.

yeah shady brady would never have lasted more than one season in the NFL back in those days when those players played.people like old fart style and the other brady worshippers cover their ears and close their eyes that brady is not even one of the top 20 best modern day quarterbacks ever because all those guys you mentioned played in an era where the QB was thrown around like a rag doll and the defenders could pretty much mug the receivers.all those qb's you mentioned could play in any era of football where brady would not last more than one season if he tried to play back then. He is such a baby he missed an entire season just from a hit to the knee on a helmet.what a wuss.think how long he would have lasted in THAT era.

Wuss? He had a torn ACL you moron. He had surgery to repair that...worked his ass off in rehab (which if any of you have ever blown a knee out you know how painful that rehab is!) and returned the next season picking up right where he left off. Tom Brady's durability isn't in question unless you're an idiot...which of course you are!

lambsfan thinks it's all fake, so what the hell does he know? He screwed up logic is just so moronic how can anyone reason with his stupidity? Hell the games are rigged, yet players and coaches cheat? Since he only watches the second half of football, he doesn't watch the game? Is he really that stupid?

 

[Toro]

Did you see what Atlanta did to Seattle and Green Bay?

My point was the Pats would not have came back against a more Super Bowl experienced team.

It's irrelevant.

They won.

I'm not a Pats fan but you can only beat what's in front of you, and the Pats did that.

Five times.

 

[Toro]

It's a statement in the New York Post you putz! Bush league antics? What has Brady ever done that was "bush league"? Since his fellow players have named him one of the best players in the game every time they are polled...it's obvious that for the NFL players...the people who would know best...Tom Brady is the gold standard!

Marino was a better passer.
Montana better in the clutch.
Stabler better under 2 minutes.
Elway had a better arm.
Roman Gabriel was tougher.

Brady is just a pretty boy with a hot wife.

The best quarterback ever was Johnny Unitas.

yeah shady brady would never have lasted more than one season in the NFL back in those days when those players played.people like old fart style and the other brady worshippers cover their ears and close their eyes that brady is not even one of the top 20 best modern day quarterbacks ever because all those guys you mentioned played in an era where the QB was thrown around like a rag doll and the defenders could pretty much mug the receivers.all those qb's you mentioned could play in any era of football where brady would not last more than one season if he tried to play back then. He is such a baby he missed an entire season just from a hit to the knee on a helmet.what a wuss.think how long he would have lasted in THAT era.

Wuss? He had a torn ACL you moron. He had surgery to repair that...worked his ass off in rehab (which if any of you have ever blown a knee out you know how painful that rehab is!) and returned the next season picking up right where he left off. Tom Brady's durability isn't in question unless you're an idiot...which of course you are!

lambsfan thinks it's all fake, so what the hell does he know? He screwed up logic is just so moronic how can anyone reason with his stupidity? Hell the games are rigged, yet players and coaches cheat? Since he only watches the second half of football, he doesn't watch the game? Is he really that stupid?

Yes.

He's a strange man.

 

[Billo_Really]

They wouldn't have been so far behind. Atlanta ran up the score against Seattle and Green Bay and neither was able to recover

Brady had to be flawless to come back. Score on each drive, no turnovers, no major penalties, stop the clock......he was

More reason he is the GOAT

Atlanta also choked in the 2nd half and couldn't handle the pressure. Those other teams wouldn't have done the same, if they were in that position. The Pats barely beat Seattle. They needed a little luck to do it. They certainly would have not come back from 28 - 3 against that team.

 

[Billo_Really]

It's irrelevant.

They won.

I'm not a Pats fan but you can only beat what's in front of you, and the Pats did that.

Five times.

They also got the shit kicked out of them by the Bronco's and Bears.

 

[rightwinger]

They wouldn't have been so far behind. Atlanta ran up the score against Seattle and Green Bay and neither was able to recover

Brady had to be flawless to come back. Score on each drive, no turnovers, no major penalties, stop the clock......he was

More reason he is the GOAT

Atlanta also choked in the 2nd half and couldn't handle the pressure. Those other teams wouldn't have done the same, if they were in that position. The Pats barely beat Seattle. They needed a little luck to do it. They certainly would have not come back from 28 - 3 against that team.

That is the way coming back from 25 point deficits works. The team in the lead has to provide opportunities and the team behind has to exploit them

 

[Billo_Really]

lambsfan thinks it's all fake, so what the hell does he know? He screwed up logic is just so moronic how can anyone reason with his stupidity? Hell the games are rigged, yet players and coaches cheat? Since he only watches the second half of football, he doesn't watch the game? Is he really that stupid?

Was the Fearsome Foursome fake? Was the Steel Curtain fake? Is the Seattle Seahawks defense fake?

 

[Billo_Really]

That is the way coming back from 25 point deficits works. The team in the lead has to provide opportunities and the team behind has to exploit them

And the other teams I mentioned would not have done that.

 

[Toro]

That is the way coming back from 25 point deficits works. The team in the lead has to provide opportunities and the team behind has to exploit them

And the other teams I mentioned would not have done that.

Those teams wouldn't have been up by 25 to begin with.

 

[ChrisL]

That is the way coming back from 25 point deficits works. The team in the lead has to provide opportunities and the team behind has to exploit them

And the other teams I mentioned would not have done that.

Well you can't really make that claim. Lol. That all depends on the situation.

 

[Papageorgio]

They wouldn't have been so far behind. Atlanta ran up the score against Seattle and Green Bay and neither was able to recover

Brady had to be flawless to come back. Score on each drive, no turnovers, no major penalties, stop the clock......he was

More reason he is the GOAT

Atlanta also choked in the 2nd half and couldn't handle the pressure. Those other teams wouldn't have done the same, if they were in that position. The Pats barely beat Seattle. They needed a little luck to do it. They certainly would have not come back from 28 - 3 against that team.

The Hawks are a shell of their former self. After the Pats beat them couple years back in the Super Bowl, they never recovered.

 

[Papageorgio]

lambsfan thinks it's all fake, so what the hell does he know? He screwed up logic is just so moronic how can anyone reason with his stupidity? Hell the games are rigged, yet players and coaches cheat? Since he only watches the second half of football, he doesn't watch the game? Is he really that stupid?

Was the Fearsome Foursome fake? Was the Steel Curtain fake? Is the Seattle Seahawks defense fake?

According to lambsfan it's all fake. The games are all rigged to him, yet teams cheat to win, makes no sense to me, but lambsfan isn't known to make any sense.

 

[Oldstyle]

That end zone interception won the game. So sowwy.

And if they had given it to Lynch, the Pats would've NOT won the game.

And if a Seahawk's receiver hadn't had a ball drop onto his body after Malcom Butler had broken up the play for a massive gain...Seattle wouldn't have had the ball deep in Patriots territory to start with! So what's your point? Seattle was incredibly lucky to find themselves at the Patriot five yard line to begin with. People keep forgetting that.

 

[rightwinger]

That is the way coming back from 25 point deficits works. The team in the lead has to provide opportunities and the team behind has to exploit them

And the other teams I mentioned would not have done that.

Seattle has a hard enough time scoring 25 points

Packer defense is worse than Atlanta. They gave up a 31-0 lead

 

[Oldstyle]

Ah...could someone explain to Fart Boy that the Patriots WON the Super Bowl? Duh...

You talk as though Brady won the Super Bowl by himself. He was lucky he was playing Atlanta. If he was playing Seattle, Carolina or Green Bay and was down 28 - 3 in the 3rd quarter, he would've been the losing quarterback. He got lucky playing a bunch of Super Bowl rookies who got psyched out in the 2nd half.

Yet he managed to lead the largest comeback in Super Bowl history? How can that be "luck"? His numbers in the fourth quarter were off the charts.

 

[Oldstyle]

Winning once that way might fall under the heading of luck...but when you've made a career of leading come from behind drives to win the Super Bowl...as Brady has...saying that he wins because of luck is rather silly.

 

[Oldstyle]

It's irrelevant.

They won.

I'm not a Pats fan but you can only beat what's in front of you, and the Pats did that.

Five times.

They also got the shit kicked out of them by the Bronco's and Bears.

Refresh my memory, Billo...what grade was Tom Brady in when the Patriots played the Bears?

 

[Papageorgio]

That end zone interception won the game. So sowwy.

And if they had given it to Lynch, the Pats would've NOT won the game.

And if a Seahawk's receiver hadn't had a ball drop onto his body after Malcom Butler had broken up the play for a massive gain...Seattle wouldn't have had the ball deep in Patriots territory to start with! So what's your point? Seattle was incredibly lucky to find themselves at the Patriot five yard line to begin with. People keep forgetting that.

As I said before you put yourself in position for luck, just like the Patriots did.