Is this trump's next target?

berg80

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2017
Messages
33,260
Reaction score
27,118
Points
2,820

‘Five alarm fire for democracy’: Dems, voting advocates voice outrage at FBI raid of Georgia elections office​

Outrage and grave concern about the midterm elections followed in the wake of the FBI’s court-authorized raid of the Fulton County, Georgia elections office Wednesday.

“This is a blatant attempt to distract from the Trump-authorized state violence that killed multiple Americans in Minnesota,” Fulton County Commissioner Dana Barrett (D), who is running for Georgia Secretary of State said. “Sending 25 FBI agents to raid our Fulton County elections office is political theater and part of a concerted effort to take over elections in swing districts across the country.”

“Let’s be clear: Trump wants full control of the outcome of the 2026 and 2028 elections because he knows they can’t win without it,” Barrett added. “He’s teeing up the MAGA-controlled state elections board to take over Fulton County elections—and he’s wasting taxpayer dollars to prop up his dangerous lies and conspiracies. Today’s actions are another disastrous step to undo the will of Georgia voters and interfere in our elections.”

Fulton Co. Democrats allege FBI lacked authority for election center raid​

Two top Democrats in Fulton County, Georgia allege that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) lacked the authority for Wednesday’s raid of the county’s central election hub, in which the Feds seized 700 boxes of ballots and other election materials related to the 2020 vote.

In an interview with Democracy Docket, District 4 Fulton County Commissioner Mo Ivory said the documents seized by federal agents Wednesday were sealed by Fulton County Judge Robert McBurney.

“There is a case right now concerning this, trying to get these documents,” Ivory said. “They’re under seal right now. Judge McBurney has not lifted the seal for them to be taken.”

In major rebuke, federal judge blocks key parts of Trump’s anti-voting order​

A federal judge Friday permanently blocked key portions of the sweeping anti-voting executive order that President Donald Trump signed last year.

Beyond simply stopping the order, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, minced no words in rebuking Trump’s attempt to expand the executive branch’s power over elections, describing it as both unconstitutional and a threat to democracy.

“The Framers of our Constitution recognized that power over election rules could be abused, either to destroy the national government or to disempower the people from acting as a check on their elected representatives,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote.


“Accordingly, they entrusted this power to the parts of our government that they believed would be most responsive to the will of the people: first to the States, and then, in some instances, to Congress.

“They assigned no role at all to the President,” she added. “Put simply, our Constitution does not allow the President to impose unilateral changes to federal election procedures.”

Through his order, Trump attempted to make registering to vote and remaining registered more difficult by imposing documentary proof of citizenship requirements for a federal registration form.

Trump admin officials promised to address state election leaders. They bailed​

Attorney General Pam Bondi, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard were scheduled to address and take questions from chief election leaders attending the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) winter conference in Washington, D.C. Friday — but all three officials canceled their appearance at the last minute without any explanation.

Bondi, Noem, and Gabbard’s abrupt cancellation drew ire among Democratic secretaries of state, who were hoping to directly address the Trump administration’s recent attacks on voting and elections — including the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) unprecedented legal effort to obtain private voter data from every state, and Gabbard’s troubling presence at the FBI’s recent raid of a Fulton County, Georgia’s election hub earlier this week.


The POT gerrymandering scheme to rig the 2026 elections hasn't gone that well for Don. In view of that failure the focus has shifted to a multi-pronged attempt to rig the election in other ways. trump has openly asked why there should elections at all.

Trump’s unsettling new question: ‘Why are we having an election?


Of course, he was only kidding, right?
 
Yes you don't want election fraud investigated?

Bill Barr Calls “Bullshit” on Trump’s Election Lies​

On the second day of public hearings on the January 6th attack, the former Attorney General and other members of Trump’s inner circle revealed the extent of their hypocrisy.

Been there done that.
 

Bill Barr Calls “Bullshit” on Trump’s Election Lies​

On the second day of public hearings on the January 6th attack, the former Attorney General and other members of Trump’s inner circle revealed the extent of their hypocrisy.

Been there done that.
Barr hasn't reviewed all of the facts. They are just now being gathered by the FBI in Georgia.

Which Barr of course is entitled to his opinion, but his opinion does not make him the final arbiter on the matter.
 
Barr hasn't reviewed all of the facts. They are just now being gathered by the FBI in Georgia.

Which Barr of course is entitled to his opinion, but his opinion does not make him the final arbiter on the matter.
All the facts have been reviewed. Of course, trump is entitled to his delusional opinion, but his opinion does not make him the final arbiter on the matter.

The problem being he has the power to order actions be taken to satisfy his delusion.
 
All the facts have been reviewed. Of course, trump is entitled to his delusional opinion, but his opinion does not make him the final arbiter on the matter.

The problem being he has the power to order actions be taken to satisfy his delusion.
The game being played here is obvious: Go after anyone who is in his way under the guise of "fixing" something, or by calling it treason. That is precisely the longtime global authoritarian template.
 
The game being played here is obvious: Go after anyone who is in his way under the guise of "fixing" something, or by calling it treason. That is precisely the longtime global authoritarian template.
While the basis on which the voter docs were taken is delusional the long term plan of control over elections is not. Instead, it's traitorous.
 
The game being played here is obvious: Go after anyone who is in his way under the guise of "fixing" something, or by calling it treason. That is precisely the longtime global authoritarian template.

Atlanta FBI boss ousted after balking at 2020 election probe​

 

What's election fraud? Define it.
Election Fraud means unlawful or otherwise improper conduct committed in an election, including but not limited to fraudulent voting such as voting twice, voting under another’s name, or similar dishonest conduct. It also includes violations of the election process or the Election Code (2 HCC § 6) in order to subvert the legitimate election results.

 
democracydocket dot com

i-bCfHhJD-M.jpg


:laugh: :laugh2: :laughing0301:
 
Election Fraud means unlawful or otherwise improper conduct committed in an election, including but not limited to fraudulent voting such as voting twice, voting under another’s name, or similar dishonest conduct. It also includes violations of the election process or the Election Code (2 HCC § 6) in order to subvert the legitimate election results.

Studies Agree: Impersonation Fraud by Voters Very Rarely Happens

The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue, The Truth About Voter Fraud, found that most reported incidents of voter fraud are actually traceable to other sources, such as clerical errors or bad data matching practices. The report reviewed elections that had been meticulously studied for voter fraud, and found incident rates between 0.0003 percent and 0.0025 percent. Given this tiny incident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American“ will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.”
 

‘Five alarm fire for democracy’: Dems, voting advocates voice outrage at FBI raid of Georgia elections office​

Outrage and grave concern about the midterm elections followed in the wake of the FBI’s court-authorized raid of the Fulton County, Georgia elections office Wednesday.

“This is a blatant attempt to distract from the Trump-authorized state violence that killed multiple Americans in Minnesota,” Fulton County Commissioner Dana Barrett (D), who is running for Georgia Secretary of State said. “Sending 25 FBI agents to raid our Fulton County elections office is political theater and part of a concerted effort to take over elections in swing districts across the country.”

“Let’s be clear: Trump wants full control of the outcome of the 2026 and 2028 elections because he knows they can’t win without it,” Barrett added. “He’s teeing up the MAGA-controlled state elections board to take over Fulton County elections—and he’s wasting taxpayer dollars to prop up his dangerous lies and conspiracies. Today’s actions are another disastrous step to undo the will of Georgia voters and interfere in our elections.”

Fulton Co. Democrats allege FBI lacked authority for election center raid​

Two top Democrats in Fulton County, Georgia allege that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) lacked the authority for Wednesday’s raid of the county’s central election hub, in which the Feds seized 700 boxes of ballots and other election materials related to the 2020 vote.

In an interview with Democracy Docket, District 4 Fulton County Commissioner Mo Ivory said the documents seized by federal agents Wednesday were sealed by Fulton County Judge Robert McBurney.

“There is a case right now concerning this, trying to get these documents,” Ivory said. “They’re under seal right now. Judge McBurney has not lifted the seal for them to be taken.”

In major rebuke, federal judge blocks key parts of Trump’s anti-voting order​

A federal judge Friday permanently blocked key portions of the sweeping anti-voting executive order that President Donald Trump signed last year.

Beyond simply stopping the order, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, minced no words in rebuking Trump’s attempt to expand the executive branch’s power over elections, describing it as both unconstitutional and a threat to democracy.

“The Framers of our Constitution recognized that power over election rules could be abused, either to destroy the national government or to disempower the people from acting as a check on their elected representatives,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote.


“Accordingly, they entrusted this power to the parts of our government that they believed would be most responsive to the will of the people: first to the States, and then, in some instances, to Congress.

“They assigned no role at all to the President,” she added. “Put simply, our Constitution does not allow the President to impose unilateral changes to federal election procedures.”

Through his order, Trump attempted to make registering to vote and remaining registered more difficult by imposing documentary proof of citizenship requirements for a federal registration form.

Trump admin officials promised to address state election leaders. They bailed​

Attorney General Pam Bondi, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard were scheduled to address and take questions from chief election leaders attending the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) winter conference in Washington, D.C. Friday — but all three officials canceled their appearance at the last minute without any explanation.

Bondi, Noem, and Gabbard’s abrupt cancellation drew ire among Democratic secretaries of state, who were hoping to directly address the Trump administration’s recent attacks on voting and elections — including the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) unprecedented legal effort to obtain private voter data from every state, and Gabbard’s troubling presence at the FBI’s recent raid of a Fulton County, Georgia’s election hub earlier this week.


The POT gerrymandering scheme to rig the 2026 elections hasn't gone that well for Don. In view of that failure the focus has shifted to a multi-pronged attempt to rig the election in other ways. trump has openly asked why there should elections at all.

Trump’s unsettling new question: ‘Why are we having an election?


Of course, he was only kidding, right?



Dimtards: DON’T EXPOSE OUR CORRUPTION!




 
Studies Agree: Impersonation Fraud by Voters Very Rarely Happens

The Brennan Center’s seminal report on this issue, The Truth About Voter Fraud, found that most reported incidents of voter fraud are actually traceable to other sources, such as clerical errors or bad data matching practices. The report reviewed elections that had been meticulously studied for voter fraud, and found incident rates between 0.0003 percent and 0.0025 percent. Given this tiny incident rate for voter impersonation fraud, it is more likely, the report noted, that an American“ will be struck by lightning than that he will impersonate another voter at the polls.”
There are other methods of voter fraud then showing up at the polls pretending to be someone else.
 
Election Fraud means unlawful or otherwise improper conduct committed in an election, including but not limited to fraudulent voting such as voting twice, voting under another’s name, or similar dishonest conduct. It also includes violations of the election process or the Election Code (2 HCC § 6) in order to subvert the legitimate election results.

Historically speaking, who tends to commit more voter fraud?
 
15th post

‘Five alarm fire for democracy’: Dems, voting advocates voice outrage at FBI raid of Georgia elections office​

Outrage and grave concern about the midterm elections followed in the wake of the FBI’s court-authorized raid of the Fulton County, Georgia elections office Wednesday.

“This is a blatant attempt to distract from the Trump-authorized state violence that killed multiple Americans in Minnesota,” Fulton County Commissioner Dana Barrett (D), who is running for Georgia Secretary of State said. “Sending 25 FBI agents to raid our Fulton County elections office is political theater and part of a concerted effort to take over elections in swing districts across the country.”

“Let’s be clear: Trump wants full control of the outcome of the 2026 and 2028 elections because he knows they can’t win without it,” Barrett added. “He’s teeing up the MAGA-controlled state elections board to take over Fulton County elections—and he’s wasting taxpayer dollars to prop up his dangerous lies and conspiracies. Today’s actions are another disastrous step to undo the will of Georgia voters and interfere in our elections.”

Fulton Co. Democrats allege FBI lacked authority for election center raid​

Two top Democrats in Fulton County, Georgia allege that the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) lacked the authority for Wednesday’s raid of the county’s central election hub, in which the Feds seized 700 boxes of ballots and other election materials related to the 2020 vote.

In an interview with Democracy Docket, District 4 Fulton County Commissioner Mo Ivory said the documents seized by federal agents Wednesday were sealed by Fulton County Judge Robert McBurney.

“There is a case right now concerning this, trying to get these documents,” Ivory said. “They’re under seal right now. Judge McBurney has not lifted the seal for them to be taken.”

In major rebuke, federal judge blocks key parts of Trump’s anti-voting order​

A federal judge Friday permanently blocked key portions of the sweeping anti-voting executive order that President Donald Trump signed last year.

Beyond simply stopping the order, U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, minced no words in rebuking Trump’s attempt to expand the executive branch’s power over elections, describing it as both unconstitutional and a threat to democracy.

“The Framers of our Constitution recognized that power over election rules could be abused, either to destroy the national government or to disempower the people from acting as a check on their elected representatives,” Kollar-Kotelly wrote.


“Accordingly, they entrusted this power to the parts of our government that they believed would be most responsive to the will of the people: first to the States, and then, in some instances, to Congress.

“They assigned no role at all to the President,” she added. “Put simply, our Constitution does not allow the President to impose unilateral changes to federal election procedures.”

Through his order, Trump attempted to make registering to vote and remaining registered more difficult by imposing documentary proof of citizenship requirements for a federal registration form.

Trump admin officials promised to address state election leaders. They bailed​

Attorney General Pam Bondi, U.S. Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard were scheduled to address and take questions from chief election leaders attending the National Association of Secretaries of State (NASS) winter conference in Washington, D.C. Friday — but all three officials canceled their appearance at the last minute without any explanation.

Bondi, Noem, and Gabbard’s abrupt cancellation drew ire among Democratic secretaries of state, who were hoping to directly address the Trump administration’s recent attacks on voting and elections — including the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) unprecedented legal effort to obtain private voter data from every state, and Gabbard’s troubling presence at the FBI’s recent raid of a Fulton County, Georgia’s election hub earlier this week.


The POT gerrymandering scheme to rig the 2026 elections hasn't gone that well for Don. In view of that failure the focus has shifted to a multi-pronged attempt to rig the election in other ways. trump has openly asked why there should elections at all.

Trump’s unsettling new question: ‘Why are we having an election?


Of course, he was only kidding, right?

This is the LONGEST freeeking joke I've ever read in my life!!!!! ROFLMAO

Like ALL DementedcRats........he believes the laws are for us peons and slave workers, and not for his Oligarchy Crime Organization.

Trump -- NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAWS.

Democrats -- WE MAKE THE LAWS SO WE ARE IMMUNE.
 

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom