In which case America should dogpile on these fucked up leftards. Make their lives truly miserable.sounds like they may be planning an insurrection.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In which case America should dogpile on these fucked up leftards. Make their lives truly miserable.sounds like they may be planning an insurrection.
Don't start me, slimy leftard.Can you provide specific examples of the violence, propaganda and intimidation to influence the political outcomes involving Democrats.
I have literally hundreds of examples of Republicans doing ALL of these things.
Only a shit refuses to accept the will of the people.
Oh, puh-leeeeeze...
Nobody on the other side is seriously contemplating not certifying election results...
That's the domain of your ignorant, arrogant amoral piece-of-$hit un-American Orange Baboon-God...
Only in your imagination.Things are already a MESS because Liberals are controlling the country, sadly.
Trump incited an insurrection. He disqualified himself.Are you talking about this commie freak? From the OP:
While Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) conceded that there could be violence, he said it wouldn’t necessarily stop them from trying to disqualify him. “We might just decide that’s something we need to prepare for.”
I wonder if he knows the house doesn't have the constitutional authority to unilaterally disqualify anyone, with the exception of members of the house. If they try any shit they may find out why Americans own so many AR-15s.
.
Defend democracy by burning the Republic to the ground. That checks out. They know not how to build, only destroy.
You didn't read the source article, you only read the right wing propaganda, about the article OKTexas.Are you talking about this commie freak? From the OP:
While Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD) conceded that there could be violence, he said it wouldn’t necessarily stop them from trying to disqualify him. “We might just decide that’s something we need to prepare for.”
I wonder if he knows the house doesn't have the constitutional authority to unilaterally disqualify anyone, with the exception of members of the house. If they try any shit they may find out why Americans own so many AR-15s.
.
Opposing Democrats is the greatest display of patriotism since the founders fought the British! Yes the founders were MAGA!!!!That would, indeed, be an Insurrection.... your Orange POS was behind one... Old Uncle Joe hasn't come anywhere close.
You didn't read the source article, you only read the right wing propaganda, about the article OKTexas.
They were talking about the supreme court, and what their decision may say and do, which could be throwing the insurrection disqualification to Congress to decide...
It’s a media fabrication term that libs naturally locked on toLaw enforcement has already made that decision, since not one person has been charged under the insurrection act. The term "insurrection" has been used, by political actors, trying to score political points, nothing more. There is absolutely nothing the house could legitimately do to change any of that.
.
The ever erudite and sophisticated adults at the Atlantic show Democrats considering a new version of "DEFENDING DEMOCRACY!" (tm) in their latest superior and well credentialed rhetorical flourish.
Things could get ugly folks.
From the article:
And it gets profoundly worse:
You wanna see blatant, even dangerous hypocrisy?
RATskin is the masterclass.
With the jarring realization that their electoral goose may be cooked in November, the Dems are shockingly becoming even more unhinged and a threat to the very nation they purport to defend.
"Pot.... meet Kettle..."We disputed the election but never had a feasible effort to stop it or change it
If Dems try to thwart the will of the voting public then that would fit the Classic Definition of All Elements of Insurrection
Several people have been charged and convicted of "seditious conspiracy".Law enforcement has already made that decision, since not one person has been charged under the insurrection act. The term "insurrection" has been used, by political actors, trying to score political points, nothing more. There is absolutely nothing the house could legitimately do to change any of that.
.
No one has to be formally charged with Insurrection for an actual "insurrection" to have taken place.Several people have been charged and convicted of "seditious conspiracy".
"Now I don't know what that is...but it sounds bad".
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
www.law.cornell.edu
Several people have been charged and convicted of "seditious conspiracy".
"Now I don't know what that is...but it sounds bad".
18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy
www.law.cornell.edu