Is there a Scientific Theory to explain Climate Change?

[saveliberty]

A link to your source would have been handy.

Here is the origin of the gas stove issue:

The Health Risks of Gas Stoves Explained

Gas stoves produce emissions that can harm human health and the environment. Experts answer questions about the dangers and how to limit them

www.scientificamerican.com

You realize your own article addresses what I said right? lol

 

[Crick]

You realize your own article addresses what I said right? lol

Yes. Are you familiar with the term "false dichotomy"?

 

[Flash]

Climate change has been going on since the earth was created. The only time the climate was stable for a long period was during the "Boring Billion" when for a billion years not much changed.

Climate change has been responsible for several mass extinctions and the demise of 99% of the species that ever lived on earth. It will probably be the demise of humans.

 

[saveliberty]

Yes. Are you familiar with the term "false dichotomy"?

Are you familiar with got nailed by your own article? lol

 

[jc456]

The elimination of gas stoves was a children's health issue, not global warming.

No study says that

 

[jc456]

Climate change has been going on since the earth was created. The only time the climate was stable for a long period was during the "Boring Billion" when for a billion years not much changed.

Climate change has been responsible for several mass extinctions and the demise of 99% of the species that ever lived on earth. It will probably be the demise of humans.

Based on archeological finds that already happened at least once maybe twice

 

[Crick]

Based on archeological finds that already happened at least once maybe twice

Archaeology is the study of human history and prehistory. The last mass extinction was the asteroid collision that wiped out the dinosaurs 65.5 million years ago.

 

[jc456]

Archaeology is the study of human history and prehistory. The last mass extinction was the asteroid collision that wiped out the dinosaurs 65.5 million years ago.

Marta, Giza.

Where are all the people?

 

[Crick]

Marta, Giza.

Where are all the people?

What do you mean?

 

[Kilroy2]

Do an actual experiment, like bringing rain to an arid area, or, stopping a hurricane, etc. if you can’t do that, there is no scientific basis for your human caused climate change.

And what is your point?

 

[Kilroy2]

what was the instrument that cut the granite for the pyramids?

If you have a point state it.

 

[frigidweirdo]

Global Warming had a CO2/Hockey Stick argument to support its proposition, but its successor, Climate Change, doesn't seem to have any scientific argument to explain a cause/effect relationship. Instead, it has devolved into a constantly changing series of social/political theories which do not even purport to be connected to physical weather events. Is there any scientific theory to explain why current Climate Change is different from past Climate Change?

There is a difference, there always is a difference between the different peaks in rising temperatures, so many different factors come together, and human influence MAY play a part, certainly the increasing CO2 will play an influence (it might actually be keeping temperatures down, or it might not).
However I doubt anyone is going to answer your question, I've read a few replies and they really look like they didn't understand what you'd even asked.

 

[Kilroy2]

they have no idea how a hurricane starts or they could replicate it to figure out how to stop it. you're just one of those smart stupid people.

They know exactly how a hurricane starts. No they can't replicate a hurricane just like you cannot be born but once. Just because they cannot replicate JC456 does not mean that they can replicate a smarter one.

 

[Kilroy2]

Oh don't get me wrong, I know that smart stupid demofks believe that because they were told to, but science doesn't`. Never has.

Scientific Consensus: Why Should We Accept It?

Scientific consensus isn't reached only through whipping up votes. It's actually born out of an overwhelming agreement between scientists of varying fields of study regarding a particular issue at hand.

futurism.com

Republicans in denial is so funny.

 

[Kilroy2]

It has to do with proving humans can cause a chage in the climate. You know, real science.

 

[jc456]

And what is your point?

You can’t be that stupid, man controlling weather!

We have to control the weather to eventually change climate.

 

[jc456]

If you have a point state it.

What tool cut the granite in the pyramids?

Who has one?

 

[jc456]

They know exactly how a hurricane starts. No they can't replicate a hurricane just like you cannot be born but once. Just because they cannot replicate JC456 does not mean that they can replicate a smarter one.

How will they control it? How much CO2 contributes?

 

[jc456]

Well then do you believe in GOD.

Who cut the granite rock so smooth? What was the tool called? Is there one still around?

 

[jc456]

Scientific Consensus: Why Should We Accept It?

Scientific consensus isn't reached only through whipping up votes. It's actually born out of an overwhelming agreement between scientists of varying fields of study regarding a particular issue at hand.

futurism.com

Republicans in denial is so funny.

Just as I said!