Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Ok, Trump is grasping at straws. We'll need to wait for the trial to see how it all works out.
If Barr is correct Trump is toast. If Fitton is correct, Trump walks. We'll see.
True. My point being that the democrats wasted time on the trial since Trump was gone. The purpose of an impeachment is to remove a president.
Impeachment means nothing dumbass. It means that there are articles that go to trial in the senate.Dumbfuck, he was impeached on January 13th, 2021...
Was he, or was he not, still president on January 13th, 2021?
The answer exposes your extremely low IQ.
The word is "neither", you illiterate imbecile.No, either should Pence.
So you admit that the 2nd impeachment was a "political assassination" attempt to keep Trump from running for future office without any "high crime" being committed?Yet again, you demonstrate your IQ is VERY low. Removing him from office was not the goal of holding an impeachment trial.
Yep, I think we debated this before? If the Clinton tapes case is precedent the MAL boxes are Trump's personal property, if not he's toast. The PRA should govern a president moving docs out of the WH. He didn't steal them like Biden or Pence or Sandy Berger.Fitton (English Major, not a lawyer) isn't correct. He lost the Judicial Watch v. NARA case (Clinton Tape Case). Also the Clinton tape case had nothing to do with 18 USC 793(e) and national defense information which is a crime v. the PRA of 1978 which is administrative law with no criminal enforcement.
WW
jonathanturley.org
So you admit that the 2nd impeachment was a "political assassination" attempt to keep Trump from running for future office without any crime being committed?
Justice? Like Biden being indicted for stealing classified documents?
Justice? Like Hunter skating on his crimes?
Trump mishandled classified documents, did not sell them to US adversaries, or sell influence like the Bidens. The PRA is not a criminal statute.
The Espionage Act often seems like the last refuge of the government when it lacks any other means to punish targeted persons. This includes the continued prosecution of Julian Assange for publishing classified information, an act that newspapers have regularly done throughout history to expose government lies and abuses.Trump Card: The Use of the Espionage Act Revives Long-Standing Concerns
Below is my column in the Daily Beast on the use of the Espionage Act against former president Donald Trump in the federal prosecution by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The statute is currently being …
In a curious way, the charges against Trump are welcomed as another opportunity for the courts to look at this insidious law. That need existed long before the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
1. True.#1 Impeachment isn't a criminal trial.
#2 You describe that as if disqualifying Trump out of office again is a bad thing.
WW
Yep, I think we debated this before? If the Clinton tapes case is precedent the MAL boxes are Trump's personal property, if not he's toast.
The PRA should govern a president moving docs out of the WH.
Subversion? No. Justice, yes. When should trump be indicted? Sounds like a way to get him off the hook, because the guy would simply pardon himself, or threaten congress again in some way.Donald Trump is a leading presidential candidate for the 2024 election.
President: general election : 2024 Polls
The latest political polls and polling averages from FiveThirtyEight.projects.fivethirtyeight.com
By indicting Trump now Jack Smith is potentially removing the leading 2024 presidential candidate from voters.
Can the judge postpone or dismiss the indictment charges to be sure that the electorate can vote for their preferred president?
Lets take a poll, especially considering the past democrat charges against Trump (Russian collusion, the Steele Dossier, Operations Crossfire-Hurricane and Crossfire Razor, the FBI Gestapo paying Twitter & FB to censor the Biden laptop story, the CIA lying about the laptop calling it Russian Disinformation scamming 2020 voters, and the MSM's constant 95% negative coverage of Trump, but covering up for Biden, etc. You all know that "the LAW" is being subverted in favor of democrats.
Impeachment means nothing dumbass. It means that there are articles that go to trial in the senate.
Did the 1/13/21 "impeachment" have ANY effect on Trump? Ans: NO.
Trump was long gone before the trial to "remove him" even started.
1. True.
2. Democrats fucked with Trump for 4-years with the Russian Collusion LIE, and then tried to take away the voter's choice for president in 2024.
So if the choice in 2024 is Biden or Trump, you'd vote for Biden?
The FBI Gestapo had to know that when the banks reported suspicious money transfers, that was "money laundering" by the Bidens.Can't indict a sitting president.
So you admit that the 2nd impeachment was a "political assassination" attempt to keep Trump from running for future office without any "high crime" being committed?
Yep, I think we debated this before? If the Clinton tapes case is precedent the MAL boxes are Trump's personal property, if not he's toast. The PRA should govern a president moving docs out of the WH. He didn't steal them like Biden or Pence or Sandy Berger.
The Act often seems like the last refuge of the government when it lacks any other means to punish targeted persons. This includes the continued prosecution of Julian Assange for publishing classified information, an act that newspapers have regularly done throughout history to expose government lies and abuses.Trump Card: The Use of the Espionage Act Revives Long-Standing Concerns
Below is my column in the Daily Beast on the use of the Espionage Act against former president Donald Trump in the federal prosecution by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The statute is currently being …
In a curious way, the charges against Trump are welcomed as another opportunity for the courts to look at this insidious law. That need existed long before the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
You think Trump is on the hook? For what, mishandling documents?Subversion? No. Justice, yes. When should trump be indicted? Sounds like a way to get him off the hook, because the guy would simply pardon himself, or threaten congress again in some way.
Nah--he needs to be held accountable and even his lawyers, who are dropping out like flies, know this.
1. True.
2. Democrats fucked with Trump for 4-years with the Russian Collusion LIE, and then tried to take away the voter's choice for president in 2024.
So if the choice in 2024 is Biden or Trump, you'd vote for Biden?
The FBI Gestapo had to know that when the banks reported suspicious money transfers, that was "money laundering" by the Bidens.
But the Espionage Act is a criminal statute and you don’t actually have to give the info to anyone for there to be a violation.Justice? Like Biden being indicted for stealing classified documents?
Justice? Like Hunter skating on his crimes?
Trump mishandled classified documents, did not sell them to US adversaries, or sell influence like the Bidens. The PRA is not a criminal statute.
The Espionage Act often seems like the last refuge of the government when it lacks any other means to punish targeted persons. This includes the continued prosecution of Julian Assange for publishing classified information, an act that newspapers have regularly done throughout history to expose government lies and abuses.Trump Card: The Use of the Espionage Act Revives Long-Standing Concerns
Below is my column in the Daily Beast on the use of the Espionage Act against former president Donald Trump in the federal prosecution by Special Counsel Jack Smith. The statute is currently being …
In a curious way, the charges against Trump are welcomed as another opportunity for the courts to look at this insidious law. That need existed long before the raid on Mar-a-Lago.
