If Hunter wasn't involved, then maybe you would be respected in your attempt to make excuses, but you just can't get by the elephant in the room can you ?
You havent' convinced anyone he was involved in anything illegal or immoral.
You can't make videos with people in it that weren't there. How did Russia get Hunter's former colleagues to say the emails were genuine? Why did Anthony Bobulinski surrender his cell phone to the FBI to examine the text messages he got from Hunter? Sorry, but this isn't Russia, this is real.
It is known that the Russians hacked Bursima's email server in 2018. All they'd have to do is download the real ones, make a few changes in text, and wham, you have a supposed scandal.
Also, there are no videos... if there were, Fox News would be playing them 24/7. You'd think they'd turned into PornHub.
Yes, we know what Biden did. It's called a quid pro quo, the same thing they impeached Trump for even though he never did it. There is no evidence of Shokin stealing the money we gave Ukraine. Joe wanted Shokin gone because he was looking into his son and the company that gave him a high paying no show job.
Actually, there was plenty of evidence of Shokin's corruption.
Donald Trump said Ukraine’s former chief prosecutor was an honest, wronged man, fired after Joe Biden tried to shut down an investigation into his son’s gas company. In Kiev, Oliver Carroll speaks to people who know Viktor Shokin, and finds a different story
www.independent.co.uk
Put simply, the chronology doesn’t work – the investigation into
Burisma, where Hunter worked, was dormant by the time Shokin was pushed out. It would also represent a major historical anomaly. During Shokin’s 13 months in office, not one major figure was convicted. No oligarch. No politician. No ranking bureaucrat. It would appear unlikely he was in the middle of breaking the habit with the Bidens.
Lack of aggression was a description many would use for Shokin’s approach to the job in his third spell. Two of the people interviewed for this article described the former chief prosecutor as “lazy”, and uninterested in real investigations. Others noted a penchant for bonding with oligarchs over vodka in the bathhouse.
“He wasn’t exactly highly professional,” said one source, a current Kiev-based prosecutor who asked to remain anonymous. “Shokin would always sign documents without really looking at them..”