- Sep 19, 2011
- 28,466
- 10,043
- 900
Obama told us in his book..."Dreams of My Father"
"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied.
They were revealed.
Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time.”
So to all you people that didn't know the above statement and voted for Obama were you fooled by his "tricks; an effective tactic"?
Do you think Obama would have been nominated in Iowa if he had come across as he obviously felt, i.e. an "angry black man"?
Would you that voted for him really want an "angry black man" be president?
When Obama was running he NEVER told Americans that he would become the most
divisive president. He fooled you all and the proof is in the people he hired. Remember an executive generally approves subordinates that reflect the executives attitudes and opinions. Obama has hired people that mirror his attitude and opinions.
Here is one of the people Obama hired and this person's opinion of Americans.
MIT economist Jonathan Gruber may not have been a household name, at least before this week, despite his being described as the “architect” of Obamacare.
Gruber has made controversial comments in the past, but they don’t compare to the comments that came to light this week, six videos in total and counting – including one where he refers to the “stupidity of the American voter.”
So any of you that were unaware that Obama was an angry black man who by his subordinates also mirror his attitude i.e. "stupidity of the American voter"... how do you feel being considered a fool for Obama...i.e. a FFO???
"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned.
People were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves.
They were more than satisfied.
They were revealed.
Such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn't seem angry all the time.”
So to all you people that didn't know the above statement and voted for Obama were you fooled by his "tricks; an effective tactic"?
Do you think Obama would have been nominated in Iowa if he had come across as he obviously felt, i.e. an "angry black man"?
Would you that voted for him really want an "angry black man" be president?
When Obama was running he NEVER told Americans that he would become the most
divisive president. He fooled you all and the proof is in the people he hired. Remember an executive generally approves subordinates that reflect the executives attitudes and opinions. Obama has hired people that mirror his attitude and opinions.
Here is one of the people Obama hired and this person's opinion of Americans.
MIT economist Jonathan Gruber may not have been a household name, at least before this week, despite his being described as the “architect” of Obamacare.
Gruber has made controversial comments in the past, but they don’t compare to the comments that came to light this week, six videos in total and counting – including one where he refers to the “stupidity of the American voter.”
So any of you that were unaware that Obama was an angry black man who by his subordinates also mirror his attitude i.e. "stupidity of the American voter"... how do you feel being considered a fool for Obama...i.e. a FFO???
